Literature DB >> 27768966

A multicenter study assessing uterine cavity width in over 400 nulliparous women seeking IUD insertion using 2D and 3D sonography.

Dirk Wildemeersch1, Thomas Hasskamp2, Kilian Nolte3, Sohela Jandi4, Ansgar Pett4, Sabine Linden5, Maarten van Santen6, Olivier Julen7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the selection of an appropriate IUD little consideration is placed on device size or adequacy of fit. Properly fitting IUDs will likely lead to less adverse effects or patient discomfort resulting in enhanced continuation of use.
METHODS: A multicenter study conducted at 7 centers in 410 nulliparous women, to measure the width of the uterine cavity using 2D and 3D ultrasound.
RESULTS: Measurements of maximal fundal cavity width was performed by either 2D or 3D ultrasound by experienced sonographists. The mean width of the uterine cavity in the fundus was 22.2mm (range 6.0-41.1mm). There was no statistical difference in the values whether determined by 2D (n=258) or 3D (n=152) measurements having a median value of 22.5mm and 21.6mm, respectively, 79% of women had a uterine cavity width between 15mm and 28mm, 32%<20mm and 6.8%<15mm, respectively. DISCUSSION: Uterine cavities in nulliparous women are narrow and rarely wide enough to fit conventional IUDs. Gross discrepancy between the IUD and the uterine cavity leads to side effect (e.g., expulsion, embedment, bleeding, pain) and early discontinuation. Historically, devices too large for the uterine cavity have been routinely inserted which may account for their 5-year continuation rates being only 40 to 50%. Our study suggests that preprocedural 2D or 3D sonography to measure the width of the uterine cavity may result in the selection of a suitable IUD to maximize continuation of use. Measurement of the cavity width is not necessary with a frameless IUD.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D ultrasound; 3D ultrasound; Nulliparous women; Uterine cavity width

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27768966     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

1.  Uterine cavities are much smaller than what most gynecologists think.

Authors:  Dirk Wildemeersch
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-09-01

2.  Three-dimensional measurement and analysis of morphological parameters of the uterus in infertile women.

Authors:  Yankun Feng; Shaojing Zhang; Ying Zhou; Guibing He; Liting Hong; Li Shi; Jianmei Wang; Ping Zhang; Lidong Zhai
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-04

3.  Continuation rates of two different-sized copper intrauterine devices among nulliparous women: Interim 12-month results of a single-blind, randomised, multicentre trial.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Courtney A Schreiber; David K Turok; Jeffrey T Jensen; Mitchell D Creinin; Kavita Nanda; Katharine O'Connell White; Ila Dayananda; Stephanie B Teal; Pai-Lien Chen; Beatrice A Chen; Alisa B Goldberg; Jennifer L Kerns; Clint Dart; Anita L Nelson; Michael A Thomas; David F Archer; Jill E Brown; Paula M Castaño; Anne E Burke; Bliss Kaneshiro; Diana L Blithe
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-07-16

Review 4.  Intrauterine levonorgestrel delivery with frameless fibrous delivery system: review of clinical experience.

Authors:  Dirk Wildemeersch; Amaury Andrade; Norman D Goldstuck; Thomas Hasskamp; Geert Jackers
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-01-21

5.  Systematic review of copper intrauterine contraception continuation in young nulliparous women based on intrauterine device type.

Authors:  Hannat Akintomide; Alison James; Malcolm Moffat; Pam Barnes; Judith Rankin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Dimensional analysis of the endometrial cavity: how many dimensions should the ideal intrauterine device or system have?

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-04-09

7.  Considerations on a new, frameless copper-releasing intrauterine system for intracesarean insertion and its future clinical significance: A review.

Authors:  Hazal Kutlucan; Recep Onur Karabacak; Dirk Wildemeersch
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2020-06-08

8.  Assessment of a Novel Fixation Method of a Frameless Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Inserted during Cesarean Delivery as a Means of Preventing Displacements and Expulsions: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Hazal Kutlucan; Recep Onur Karabacak; Stefanie De Buyser; Ahmet Erdem; Nuray Bozkurt; Erhan Demirdağ; Dirk Wildemeersch
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.