Literature DB >> 27768606

Comparison of survival with somatostatin analog and chemotherapy and prognostic factors for treatment in 165 advanced neuroendocrine tumor patients with Ki-67 20% or less.

Ersin Özaslan1, Halit Karaca, Sinan Koca, Alper Sevinç, Bekir Hacioğlu, Metin Özkan, Melike Özçelik, Ayşe O Duran, İlhan Hacibekiroğlu, Yaşar Yildiz, Özgür Tanriverdi, Serkan Menekşe, Asude Aksoy, Oktay Bozkurt, Semiha Urvay, Mükremin Uysal, Hacer Demir, Aydin Çiltaş, Faysal Dane.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to compare progression-free survival (PFS) with somatostatin analog (SSA) versus chemotherapy (CTx) in first-line therapy and to determine the patient group in which these treatments were more effective in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with a Ki-67 index of 20% or less. Patients who received SSA or CTx and had unresectable locally advanced and metastatic NETs with a Ki-67 index of 20% or less were retrospectively selected from 13 centers in the Turkish database between 2000 and 2015. One hundred and sixty-five patients were enrolled. The median age was 56 years and the male-to-female ratio was 1.09. Seventy-four (45%) patients were of grade 1 NET and 91 (55%) were of grade 2. SSA was given to 104 patients, whereas 61 were treated with CTx. The objective response rate after SSA was 15.4%; another 73.1% had stable disease. The objective response rate after CTx was 36.1%, and 40.9% had stable disease (P=0.008). The median PFS in SSA patients was 21 months (95% confidence interval: 12.4-29.6), and 8 months for CTx (95% confidence interval: 5.5-10.6) (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between PFS of receiving SSA and CTx in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) patients; however, the PFS of receiving SSA was longer in non-PNET patients (P<0.001). SSA was better treatment in advanced NET patients with a Ki-67 index of less than 5%, having a primary resected and a performance status of 0 (P<0.05). SSA may be preferred over CTx in advanced NET patients with low-to-intermediate grade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27768606     DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  4 in total

1.  Outcome of Patients With Metastatic Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors Submitted to First Line Monotherapy With Somatostatin Analogs.

Authors:  Elisa Lenotti; Andrea Alberti; Francesca Spada; Vito Amoroso; Patrick Maisonneuve; Salvatore Grisanti; Alice Baggi; Susanna Bianchi; Nicola Fazio; Alfredo Berruti
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.555

2.  Predictors of antiproliferative effect of lanreotide autogel in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Faidon-Marios Laskaratos; Eleni Armeni; Heer Shah; Maria Megapanou; Dimitrios Papantoniou; Aimee R Hayes; Shaunak Navalkissoor; Gopinath Gnanasegaran; Conrad von Stempel; Edward Phillips; Myles Furnace; Lukasz Kamieniarz; Margarita Kousteni; Tu Vinh Luong; Jennifer Watkins; Dalvinder Mandair; Martyn Caplin; Christos Toumpanakis
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Challenges in treatment of a patient suffering from neuroendocrine tumor G1 of the hilar bile duct: a case report.

Authors:  Biao Zhang; Shuang Li; Zhen Sun; Xu Chen; Bing Qi; Qingkai Zhang; Guixin Zhang; Dong Shang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Irene Ramos-Alvarez; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.