Literature DB >> 27768245

A comparison of DNA extraction methods for high-throughput DNA analyses.

Lauren M Schiebelhut1, Sarah S Abboud2, Liza E Gómez Daglio2, Holly F Swift2, Michael N Dawson1,2.   

Abstract

The inclusion of next-generation sequencing technologies in population genetic and phylogenetic studies has elevated the need to balance time and cost of DNA extraction without compromising DNA quality. We tested eight extraction methods - ranging from low- to high-throughput techniques - and eight phyla: Annelida, Arthropoda, Cnidaria, Chordata, Echinodermata, Mollusca, Ochrophyta and Porifera. We assessed DNA yield, purity, efficacy and cost of each method. Extraction efficacy was quantified using the proportion of successful polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of two molecular markers for metazoans (mitochondrial COI and nuclear histone 3) and one for Ochrophyta (mitochondrial nad6) at four time points - 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 years following extraction. DNA yield and purity were quantified using NanoDrop absorbance ratios. Cost was estimated in terms of time and material expense. Results show differences in DNA yield, purity and PCR success between extraction methods and that performance also varied by taxon. The traditional time-intensive, low-throughput CTAB phenol-chloroform extraction performed well across taxa, but other methods also performed well and provide the opportunity to reduce time spent at the bench and increase throughput.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community genetics; comparative phylogeography; fish; macrophytes; marine invertebrates; population genomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27768245     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  14 in total

1.  Citywide Transmission of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis Under China's Rapid Urbanization: A Retrospective Population-based Genomic Spatial Epidemiological Study.

Authors:  Qi Jiang; Qingyun Liu; Lecai Ji; Jinli Li; Yaling Zeng; Liangguang Meng; Geyang Luo; Chongguang Yang; Howard E Takiff; Zheng Yang; Weiguo Tan; Weiye Yu; Qian Gao
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  A bifurcated continuous field-flow fractionation (BCFFF) chip for high-yield and high-throughput nucleic acid extraction and purification.

Authors:  Chenguang Zhang; Gongchen Sun; Satyajyoti Senapati; Hsueh-Chia Chang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Comparative evaluation of different molecular methods for DNA extraction from individual Teladorsagia circumcincta nematodes.

Authors:  S Sloan; C J Jenvey; D Piedrafita; S Preston; M J Stear
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.563

4.  Miniaturization and optimization of 384-well compatible RNA sequencing library preparation.

Authors:  Madeline Y Mayday; Lillian M Khan; Eric D Chow; Matt S Zinter; Joseph L DeRisi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Extracting the invisible: obtaining high quality DNA is a challenging task in small arthropods.

Authors:  Andrea Lienhard; Sylvia Schäffer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Improving sustainable use of genetic resources in biodiversity archives.

Authors:  E J Tuschhoff; Carl R Hutter; Richard E Glor
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Twelve quick steps for genome assembly and annotation in the classroom.

Authors:  Hyungtaek Jung; Tomer Ventura; J Sook Chung; Woo-Jin Kim; Bo-Hye Nam; Hee Jeong Kong; Young-Ok Kim; Min-Seung Jeon; Seong-Il Eyun
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Evaluation of an automated protocol for efficient and reliable DNA extraction of dietary samples.

Authors:  Corinna Wallinger; Karin Staudacher; Daniela Sint; Bettina Thalinger; Johannes Oehm; Anita Juen; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 9.  A Guide to Carrying Out a Phylogenomic Target Sequence Capture Project.

Authors:  Tobias Andermann; Maria Fernanda Torres Jiménez; Pável Matos-Maraví; Romina Batista; José L Blanco-Pastor; A Lovisa S Gustafsson; Logan Kistler; Isabel M Liberal; Bengt Oxelman; Christine D Bacon; Alexandre Antonelli
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  A Host-Specific Blocking Primer Combined with Optimal DNA Extraction Improves the Detection Capability of a Metabarcoding Protocol for Canine Vector-Borne Bacteria.

Authors:  Lucas G Huggins; Anson V Koehler; Bettina Schunack; Tawin Inpankaew; Rebecca J Traub
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.