Literature DB >> 27767344

The Development of the Inventory of Problems-29: A Brief Self-Administered Measure for Discriminating Bona Fide From Feigned Psychiatric and Cognitive Complaints.

Donald J Viglione1, Luciano Giromini2, Patricia Landis1.   

Abstract

This article describes the development of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29), a new, short, paper-and-pencil, self-administered measure of feigned mental and cognitive disorders. Four clinical comparison simulation studies were conducted. Study 1 (n = 451) selected the items and produced an index of potential feigning. Study 2 (n = 331) scaled this index to produce a probability score, and examined its psychometric properties. Study 3 tested the generalizability of Study 2's findings with 2 additional samples (ns = 128 and 90). Results supported the utility of the IOP-29 for discriminating bona fide from feigned psychiatric and cognitive complaints. Validity was demonstrated in feigning mild traumatic brain injury, psychosis, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depression. Within the independent samples of Studies 2 and 3, the brief IOP-29 performed similarly to the MMPI-2 and Personality Assessment Inventory, and perhaps better than the Test of Memory Malingering. Classifications within these samples with base rates of .5 produced sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive power, and negative predictive power statistics of about .80. Further research is needed testing the IOP-29 in ecologically valid field studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27767344     DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1233882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Assess        ISSN: 0022-3891


  6 in total

1.  Psychometric Performance of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST) in Veteran PTSD Assessment.

Authors:  Erika J Wolf; Stephanie Ellickson-Larew; Rachel E Guetta; Shaline Escarfulleri; Karen Ryabchenko; Mark W Miller
Journal:  Psychol Inj Law       Date:  2020-04-15

2.  Comparability and Validity of the Online and In-Person Administrations of the Inventory of Problems-29.

Authors:  Luciano Giromini; Claudia Pignolo; Gerald Young; Eric Y Drogin; Alessandro Zennaro; Donald J Viglione
Journal:  Psychol Inj Law       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 3.  Remote Forensic Psychological Assessment in Civil Cases: Considerations for Experts Assessing Harms from Early Life Abuse.

Authors:  Julie Goldenson; Nina Josefowitz
Journal:  Psychol Inj Law       Date:  2021-03-13

4.  Indicators to distinguish symptom accentuators from symptom producers in individuals with a diagnosed adjustment disorder: A pilot study on inconsistency subtypes using SIMS and MMPI-2-RF.

Authors:  Cristina Mazza; Graziella Orrù; Franco Burla; Merylin Monaro; Stefano Ferracuti; Marco Colasanti; Paolo Roma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  PediaTrac V.3.0 protocol: a prospective, longitudinal study of the development and validation of a web-based tool to measure and track infant and toddler development from birth through 18 months.

Authors:  Renee Lajiness-O'Neill; Seth Warschausky; Alissa Huth-Bocks; H Gerry Taylor; Judith Brooks; Angela Lukomski; Trivellore Eachambadi Raghunathan; Patricia Berglund; Angela D Staples; Laszlo Erdodi; Stephen Schilling
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Detecting faking-good response style in personality questionnaires with four choice alternatives.

Authors:  Merylin Monaro; Cristina Mazza; Marco Colasanti; Stefano Ferracuti; Graziella Orrù; Alberto di Domenico; Giuseppe Sartori; Paolo Roma
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.