Literature DB >> 27767241

A roadmap for knowledge exchange and mobilization research in conservation and natural resource management.

Vivian M Nguyen1, Nathan Young2, Steven J Cooke1.   

Abstract

Scholars across all disciplines have long been interested in how knowledge moves within and beyond their community of peers. Rapid environmental changes and calls for sustainable management practices mean the best knowledge possible is needed to inform decisions, policies, and practices to protect biodiversity and sustainably manage vulnerable natural resources. Although the conservation literature on knowledge exchange (KE) and knowledge mobilization (KM) has grown in recent years, much of it is based on context-specific case studies. This presents a challenge for learning cumulative lessons from KE and KM research and thus effectively using knowledge in conservation and natural resources management. Although continued research on the gap between knowledge and action is valuable, overarching conceptual frameworks are now needed to enable summaries and comparisons across diverse KE-KM research. We propose a knowledge-action framework that provides a conceptual roadmap for future research and practice in KE/KM with the aim of synthesizing lessons learned from contextual case studies and guiding the development and testing of hypotheses in this domain. Our knowledge-action framework has 3 elements that occur at multiple levels and scales: knowledge production (e.g., academia and government), knowledge mediation (e.g., knowledge networks, actors, relational dimension, and contextual dimension), and knowledge-based action (e.g., instrumental, symbolic, and conceptual). The framework integrates concepts from the sociology of science in particular, and serves as a guide to further comprehensive understanding of knowledge exchange and mobilization in conservation and sustainable natural resource management.
© 2016 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  acción científica; compartir conocimiento; comunicación de la ciencia; interdisciplinario; interdisciplinary; knowledge management; knowledge sharing; knowledge-action gap; manejo del conocimiento; política de la ciencia; red social; science action; science communication; science policy; social network; vacío conocimiento-acción

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27767241     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  8 in total

1.  Incorporating social dimensions in planning, managing and evaluating environmental projects.

Authors:  C Louise Goggin; Thomas Barrett; John Leys; Gregory Summerell; Emma Gorrod; Stuart Waters; Mark Littleboy; Tony D Auld; Michael J Drielsma; Brian R Jenkins
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Stakeholder Participation in Freshwater Monitoring and Evaluation Programs: Applying Thresholds of Potential Concern within Environmental Flows.

Authors:  John Conallin; Craig A McLoughlin; Josh Campbell; Roger Knight; Troy Bright; Ian Fisher
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Bridging research and practice in conservation.

Authors:  Andrew N Kadykalo; Rachel T Buxton; Peter Morrison; Christine M Anderson; Holly Bickerton; Charles M Francis; Adam C Smith; Lenore Fahrig
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 7.563

4.  Crossing boundaries in conservation physiology.

Authors:  Sean Tomlinson; Jodie L Rummer; Kevin R Hultine; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Framing natural assets for advancing sustainability research: translating different perspectives into actions.

Authors:  Maria Jose Martinez-Harms; Stefan Gelcich; Rainer M Krug; Fleur J F Maseyk; Hannah Moersberger; Archi Rastogi; Geoffrey Wambugu; Cornelia B Krug; Eva M Spehn; Unai Pascual
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 6.367

6.  Ophidiomycosis, an emerging fungal disease of snakes: Targeted surveillance on military lands and detection in the western US and Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Matthew C Allender; Michael J Ravesi; Ellen Haynes; Emilie Ospina; Christopher Petersen; Christopher A Phillips; Robert Lovich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Promises and pitfalls of digital knowledge exchange resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Vivian M Nguyen; Christina Bell; Valerie Berseth; Christopher Cvitanovic; Ray Darwent; Matthew Falconer; Jenna Hutchen; Tyreen Kapoor; Nicole Klenk; Nathan Young
Journal:  Socioecol Pract Res       Date:  2021-11-25

8.  Conservation physiology and the quest for a 'good' Anthropocene.

Authors:  Christine L Madliger; Craig E Franklin; Kevin R Hultine; Mark van Kleunen; Robert J Lennox; Oliver P Love; Jodie L Rummer; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.079

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.