Literature DB >> 27766926

Comparing rat and rabbit embryo-fetal developmental toxicity data for 379 pharmaceuticals: on systemic dose and developmental effects.

Peter T Theunissen1,2,3, Sonia Beken4, Bruce Beyer5, William J Breslin6, Gregg D Cappon7, Connie L Chen8, Gary Chmielewski9, Luc de Schaepdrijver10, Brian Enright11, Jennifer E Foreman12, Wafa Harrouk13, Kok-Wah Hew14, Alan M Hoberman15, Julia Y Hui16, Thomas B Knudsen17, Susan B Laffan18, Susan L Makris19, Matthew Martin17, Mary Ellen McNerney20, Christine L Siezen2, Dinesh J Stanislaus18, Jane Stewart21, Kary E Thompson20, Belen Tornesi11, Jan Willem Van der Laan1,2, Gerhard F Weinbauer22, Sandra Wood23, Aldert H Piersma1,24.   

Abstract

A database of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity (EFDT) studies of 379 pharmaceutical compounds in rat and rabbit was analyzed for species differences based on toxicokinetic parameters of area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) at the developmental lowest adverse effect level (dLOAEL). For the vast majority of cases (83% based on AUC of n = 283), dLOAELs in rats and rabbits were within the same order of magnitude (less than 10-fold different) when compared based on available data on AUC and Cmax exposures. For 13.5% of the compounds the rabbit was more sensitive and for 3.5% of compounds the rat was more sensitive when compared based on AUC exposures. For 12% of the compounds the rabbit was more sensitive and for 1.3% of compounds the rat was more sensitive based on Cmax exposures. When evaluated based on human equivalent dose (HED) conversion using standard factors, the rat and rabbit were equally sensitive. The relative extent of embryo-fetal toxicity in the presence of maternal toxicity was not different between species. Overall effect severity incidences were distributed similarly in rat and rabbit studies. Individual rat and rabbit strains did not show a different general distribution of systemic exposure LOAELs as compared to all strains combined for each species. There were no apparent species differences in the occurrence of embryo-fetal variations. Based on power of detection and given differences in the nature of developmental effects between rat and rabbit study outcomes for individual compounds, EFDT studies in two species have added value over single studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-species evaluation; embryo-fetal developmental toxicity in rat and rabbit; human equivalent dose comparison; pharmaceutical testing; strain differences; systemic dose-based comparison

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27766926     DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1224808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  4 in total

1.  Animal to human translation: a systematic scoping review of reported concordance rates.

Authors:  Cathalijn H C Leenaars; Carien Kouwenaar; Frans R Stafleu; André Bleich; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga; Rob B M De Vries; Franck L B Meijboom
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 2.  Platforms for Personalized Polytherapeutics Discovery in COVID-19.

Authors:  Christopher Hopkins; Chidinma Onweni; Victoria Zambito; DeLisa Fairweather; Kathryn McCormick; Hideki Ebihara; Thomas Caulfield; Yu Shrike Zhang; W David Freeman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 6.151

3.  Protocols for the Evaluation of Neurodevelopmental Alterations in Rabbit Models In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Laura Pla; Britta Anna Kühne; Laia Guardia-Escote; Paula Vázquez-Aristizabal; Carla Loreiro; Burkhard Flick; Eduard Gratacós; Marta Barenys; Miriam Illa
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-22

Review 4.  Comparison of rat and rabbit embryo-fetal developmental toxicity data for 379 pharmaceuticals: on the nature and severity of developmental effects.

Authors:  Peter T Theunissen; Sonja Beken; Bruce K Beyer; William J Breslin; Gregg D Cappon; Connie L Chen; Gary Chmielewski; Luc De Schaepdrijver; Brian Enright; Jennifer E Foreman; Wafa Harrouk; Kok-Wah Hew; Alan M Hoberman; Julia Y Hui; Thomas B Knudsen; Susan B Laffan; Susan L Makris; Matt Martin; Mary Ellen McNerney; Christine L Siezen; Dinesh J Stanislaus; Jane Stewart; Kary E Thompson; Belen Tornesi; Jan Willem Van der Laan; Gerhard F Weinbauer; Sandra Wood; Aldert H Piersma
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.635

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.