Literature DB >> 27766712

Effect of the addition of chlorhexidine and miswak extract on the clinical performance and antibacterial properties of conventional glass ionomer: an in vivo study.

Noha Samir Kabil1, Amira Saad Badran1, Mariem Osama Wassel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antibacterial restorations can increase the success rate of minimum invasive dentistry especially in young permanent molars with deep carious lesions as an attempt to preserve maximum dental structure and avoid pulp exposure. Further research is warranted to evaluate different antibacterial agents.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adding chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) or aqueous miswak (Salvadora persica) extract on the clinical performance and in vivo antibacterial activity of conventional anhydrous glass ionomer cement (GIC).
DESIGN: The study was a randomized clinical trial. Sixty young permanent molars, with deep carious lesions in 6- to 9-year-old children were included. After randomization, atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) or stepwise excavation was performed followed by bacterial sampling from the center of the remaining carious dentine in the floor of the pulp. GIC powder was mixed with 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate liquid in group I; with 100% aqueous miswak in group II; and with deionized water in group III (control). Clinical performance for all groups was assessed at 3, 6, and 9 months. After 9 months, restorations were removed and a second bacterial sample was collected for Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) quantification and analysis by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test.
RESULTS: Results showed no statistically significant difference in the success rate of the three groups at the 3-month interval. At 6 and 9 months, however, restoration success was 75% then 60% in group I, 100% then 90% in group II, and 95% then 85% in control group. Group II and the control group showed statistically significant higher survival rates than group I. All groups showed reduction in S. mutans counts in underlying dentine, but the percent reduction was significantly higher in group I. (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of CHX and miswak to GIC showed superior antibacterial properties than conventional GIC, without seriously affecting the clinical performance of the restoration until the 6-month follow-up, but failure significantly increased in terms of marginal defects at 9 months with CHX (group 1).
© 2016 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27766712     DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent        ISSN: 0960-7439            Impact factor:   3.455


  10 in total

1.  Microbiological and SEM assessment of atraumatic restorative treatment in adult dentition.

Authors:  Meltem Tekbas Atay; Fatma Koray
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Does the addition of chlorhexidine to glass ionomer cements influence its antimicrobial effect and survival rate? A systematic review.

Authors:  V da Mota Martins; L R Paranhos; M N de Oliveira; L C Maia; A C Machado; P C F Santos-Filho
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2022-03-14

3.  Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of GIC Containing Chlorhexidine and Miswak on Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in Early Childhood Caries Children: A PCR Study.

Authors:  Amruta J Kalpavriksha; Shakuntala Bethur Siddaiah; Shivaprasad Bilichodmath; Somanna Prabhakara; Hanumantha Hm Rao
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr

4.  In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment.

Authors:  Cristiane Duque; Kelly Limi Aida; Jesse Augusto Pereira; Gláucia Schuindt Teixeira; Angela Scarparo Caldo-Teixeira; Luciana Rodrigues Perrone; Karina Sampaio Caiaffa; Thais de Cássia Negrini; Aline Rogéria Freire de Castilho; Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Shear Bond Strength and Film Thickness of a Naturally Antimicrobial Modified Dental Luting Cement.

Authors:  Lamia Singer; Christoph P Bourauel
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Antibacterial potency and fluoride release of a glass ionomer restorative material containing different concentrations of natural and chemical products: An in-vitro comparative study.

Authors:  Hanaa Elgamily; Omaima Ghallab; Hoda El-Sayed; Maha Nasr
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-04-01

7.  Glass ionomer cements with milled, dry chlorhexidine hexametaphosphate filler particles to provide long-term antimicrobial properties with recharge capacity.

Authors:  Candice A Bellis; Owen Addison; Angela H Nobbs; Peter F Duckworth; James A Holder; Michele E Barbour
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  The effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on the antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of glass-ionomer cement.

Authors:  Arass Jalal Noori; Fadil Abdullah Kareem
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-10-05

Review 9.  Minimally Invasive Therapies for the Management of Dental Caries-A Literature Review.

Authors:  Hetal Desai; Cameron A Stewart; Yoav Finer
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07

10.  Antimicrobial Efficacy of Glass Ionomer Cement in Incorporation with Biogenic Zingiber officinale Capped Silver-Nanobiotic, Chlorhexidine Diacetate and Lyophilized Miswak.

Authors:  Amal Adnan Ashour; Sakeenabi Basha; Nayef H Felemban; Enas T Enan; Amal Ahmed Alyamani; Sanaa M F Gad El-Rab
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.