| Literature DB >> 27765905 |
Mark A Applebaum1,2, Aashish R Jha3,4, Clara Kao4, Kyle M Hernandez5, Gillian DeWane1, Helen R Salwen1, Alexandre Chlenski1, Marija Dobratic1, Christopher J Mariani6, Lucy A Godley6, Nanduri Prabhakar6, Kevin White4, Barbara E Stranger3,6,7, Susan L Cohn1,2.
Abstract
Neuroblastoma is notable for its broad spectrum of clinical behavior ranging from spontaneous regression to rapidly progressive disease. Hypoxia is well known to confer a more aggressive phenotype in neuroblastoma. We analyzed transcriptome data from diagnostic neuroblastoma tumors and hypoxic neuroblastoma cell lines to identify genes whose expression levels correlate with poor patient outcome and are involved in the hypoxia response. By integrating a diverse set of transcriptome datasets, including those from neuroblastoma patients and neuroblastoma derived cell lines, we identified nine genes (SLCO4A1, ENO1, HK2, PGK1, MTFP1, HILPDA, VKORC1, TPI1, and HIST1H1C) that are up-regulated in hypoxia and whose expression levels are correlated with poor patient outcome in three independent neuroblastoma cohorts. Analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and ENCODE data indicate that at least five of these nine genes have an increase in 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and a more open chromatin structure in hypoxia versus normoxia and are putative targets of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) as they contain HIF binding sites in their regulatory regions. Four of these genes are key components of the glycolytic pathway and another three are directly involved in cellular metabolism. We experimentally validated our computational findings demonstrating that seven of the nine genes are significantly up-regulated in response to hypoxia in the four neuroblastoma cell lines tested. This compact and robustly validated group of genes, is associated with the hypoxia response in aggressive neuroblastoma and may represent a novel target for biomarker and therapeutic development.Entities:
Keywords: RNA expression; hypoxia; metabolism; neuroblastoma; pathway analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27765905 PMCID: PMC5340231 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12713
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Differentially expressed gene sets show commonalities in both patient and cell line cohorts
(A) Unique and shared genes between patient cohorts 1 and 2. (B) The direction of expression change between common DEGs in survivors and deceased patients is consistent between cohorts for all but five genes. (C) Gene Ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes in both patient cohorts. (D) Unique and shared genes between cell line experiments. (E) The direction of expression change between common DEGs in normoxic and hypoxic cell lines is consistent between cohorts for all but five genes. (F) Gene Ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes in both cell line datasets.
Figure 2Nine genes are differentially expressed in all datasets and are significant on multiple analyses
(A) Unique and shared genes between patient Cohort 1, patient Cohort 2, and both cell line experiments. (B) The direction of expression change between common DEGs in all datasets is consistent for nine genes.
Figure 3hMe-Seal and ENCODE data demonstrate an open chromatin structure and HIF binding at the promotor sites of identified genes
Dnase-Seq (blue) and H3K4me3 (red) peaks are indicative of open chromatin regions. Chip-seq for HIF-1α (red) and HIF-2α (pink) show these transcription factors bind to these open promoter regions. hMe-Seal shows increased 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, another marker of open chromatin, in hypoxia (green) compared to normoxia (yellow) at each of these sites for the (A) PGK1, (B) ENO1, and (C) HILPDA genes.
Figure 4qRT-PCR shows regulation of each identified gene in neuroblastoma cell lines
Log2 transformed expression values compared to actin for nine genes in hypoxia compared to normoxia in the SK-N-BE2 cell line. All genes were significantly up regulated in hypoxia (P < 0.05).
Figure 5Kaplan-Meier analysis of all genes shows a significant association with outcome for eight of nine identified genes in both cohorts
All genes on the array are ranked by most significant FDR of patients with high vs. low expression of each gene. Statistically significant genes are located to the left of the dashed lines. Our nine identified genes are in red. Rank of each identified gene for (A) Cohort 1 and (B) Cohort 2.
Validation of the association between nine identified genes and survival in patient Cohort 3 (n = 233)
| Gene | Kaplan-Meier | Cox Regression Univariate | Cox Regression Multivariate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.65E-03 | 1.69E-07 | 1.71E-04 | |
| 2.65E-03 | 8.21E-08 | 5.95E-05 | |
| 2.65E-03 | 1.59E-08 | 5.61E-06 | |
| 9.56E-03 | 1.69E-07 | 1.98E-05 | |
| 1.94E-02 | 2.12E-03 | 2.18E-02 | |
| 1.94E-02 | 8.70E-03 | 1.93E-02 | |
| 4.20E-02 | 1.59E-08 | 5.09E-04 | |
| 4.20E-02 | 2.45E-02 | 3.54E-02 | |
| 2.70E-01 | 4.04E-06 | 2.07E-03 |