Literature DB >> 27765666

Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of a single-tablet regimen containing elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive, HIV-infected adolescents: a single-arm, open-label trial.

Aditya H Gaur1, Hilda Kizito2, Wasana Prasitsueubsai3, Natella Rakhmanina4, Mohammed Rassool5, Rana Chakraborty6, Jagmohan Batra7, Pope Kosalaraksa8, Wicharn Luesomboon9, Danielle Porter10, Yongwu Shao10, Michael Myers10, Lillian Ting10, Devi SenGupta10, Erin Quirk10, Martin S Rhee11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prodrug tenofovir alafenamide is associated with improved renal and bone safety compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. We aimed to assess safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of this single-tablet, fixed-dose combination of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in HIV-infected, treatment-naive adolescents.
METHODS: We did a 48 week, single-arm, open-label trial in treatment-naive adolescents with HIV from ten hospital clinics in South Africa, Thailand, Uganda, and the USA. Eligible participants were aged 12-18 years, with plasma HIV-1 RNA of at least 1000 copies per mL, a CD4 count of at least 100 cells per μL, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 90 mL/min per 1·73 m2 by the Schwartz formula, bodyweight of at least 35 kg, and an HIV-1 genotype with sensitivity to elvitegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. Participants received a single-tablet regimen once per day with food (administered by their parent or carer) containing 150 mg elvitegravir, 150 mg cobicistat, 200 mg emtricitabine, and 10 mg tenofovir alafenamide. Study visits to the clinic occurred at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48. The coprimary endpoints were the pharmacokinetic parameters of area under the curve (AUC) concentration at the end of the dosing interval (AUCtau) for elvitegravir and the AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) for tenofovir alafenamide, incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events, and all adverse events that emerged after treatment started (including data for bone mineral density). All participants who received one dose of study drug were included in the primary and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01854775.
FINDINGS: Between May 22, 2013, and July 22, 2014, we enrolled 50 participants, and all 50 received the assigned treatment; 24 participated in the intensive pharmacokinetic assessment. 48 patients completed the 48 weeks of treatment; two discontinued (one withdrew consent at week 8, one was lost to follow-up at week 12). The regimen was well tolerated and no discontinuations related to adverse events occurred. The mean AUCtau for elvitegravir was 23 840 ng × h per mL (coefficient of variation [CV] 25·5%), and the mean AUClast for tenofovir alafenamide was 189 ng × h per mL (CV 55·8%). Four participants (8%) had a serious adverse event, one of which (intermediate uveitis) was deemed related to the study regimen but resolved without treatment interruption. The most common study drug-related adverse events were nausea (in ten participants), abdominal pain (in six), and vomiting (in five). Exposures to the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide regimen were similar to those previously noted in adults.
INTERPRETATION: The elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide regimen was well tolerated and achieved component plasma pharmacokinetic exposures similar to those in adults. Although non-comparative with a small sample size, these data support the use of this regimen in HIV-infected adolescents and its timely assessment in younger children. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27765666     DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30121-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet HIV        ISSN: 2352-3018            Impact factor:   12.767


  8 in total

Review 1.  Noncommunicable diseases in adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV-1 infection in high-income and low-income settings.

Authors:  Steve Innes; Kunjal Patel
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.283

2.  A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model to Predict Effective HIV Prophylaxis Dosing Strategies for People Who Inject Drugs.

Authors:  Katy L Garrett; Jingxian Chen; Brian M Maas; Mackenzie L Cottrell; Heather A Prince; Craig Sykes; Amanda P Schauer; Nicole White; Julie B Dumond
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Fractures in children and adolescents living with perinatally acquired HIV.

Authors:  Denise L Jacobson; Wendy Yu; Rohan Hazra; Sean Brummel; Mitchell E Geffner; Kunjal Patel; William Borkowsky; Jiajia Wang; Janet S Chen; Ayesha Mirza; Linda A DiMeglio
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Optic Neuritis due to Use of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide: A Case Report.

Authors:  Türkan Acar; Halil Alper Eryilmaz; Bilgehan Atilgan Acar; Ertuğrul Güçlü; Oğuz Karabay
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 1.339

5.  Antiretroviral Therapy in Children and Adolescents: A Look Into Modern Single Tablet Regimens.

Authors:  Clara Lee; Jenna Sapasap; Joseph LaRochelle; Renata O Smith; Melissa E Badowski
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-11-10

6.  Overdose of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in an HIV-1-infected subject with attempted suicide.

Authors:  Hortensia Álvarez; Ana Mariño; Nieves Valcarce; Jesús García-González; Helena Díaz-Cambre; Josep M Llibre
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Single oral dose for HIV pre or post-exposure prophylaxis: user desirability and biological efficacy in macaques.

Authors:  Ivana Massud; Susan Ruone; Maria Zlotorzynska; Richard Haaland; Patrick Mills; Mian-Er Cong; Kristen Kelley; Ryan Johnson; Angela Holder; Chuong Dinh; George Khalil; Yi Pan; Colleen F Kelley; Travis Sanchez; Walid Heneine; J Gerardo García-Lerma
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 8.143

8.  Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials.

Authors:  Samir K Gupta; Frank A Post; José R Arribas; Joseph J Eron; David A Wohl; Amanda E Clarke; Paul E Sax; Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink; Stefan Esser; Anton L Pozniak; Daniel Podzamczer; Laura Waters; Chloe Orkin; Jürgen K Rockstroh; Tatiana Mudrikova; Eugenia Negredo; Richard A Elion; Susan Guo; Lijie Zhong; Christoph Carter; Hal Martin; Diana Brainard; Devi SenGupta; Moupali Das
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.177

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.