Peter N Lee1, Alison J Thornton2, Barbara A Forey2, Jan S Hamling2. 1. PN Lee Statistics and Computing Ltd, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom. Electronic address: PeterLee@pnlee.co.uk. 2. PN Lee Statistics and Computing Ltd, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to review the epidemiological evidence relating environmental tobacco smoke exposure to stroke in never smokers. METHODS: The study is similar to our review in 2006, with searches extended to March 2016. RESULTS: Twelve further studies were identified. A total of 28 studies varied considerably in design, exposure indices used, and disease definition. Based on 39 sex-specific estimates and the exposure index current spousal exposure (or nearest equivalent), the meta-analysis gave an overall fixed-effect relative risk estimate of 1.23 (95% confidence interval: 1.16-1.31), with significant (P < .05) heterogeneity. There was no significant heterogeneity by sex, continent, fatality, disease end point, or degree of adjustment for potential confounding factors. Relative risks were less elevated in prospective studies (1.15, 1.06-1.24) than in case-control studies (1.44, 1.22-1.60) or cross-sectional studies (1.40, 1.21-1.61). They also varied by publication year, but with no trend. A significant increase was not seen in studies that excluded smokers of any tobacco (1.07, .97-1.17), but was seen for studies that included pipe- or cigar-only smokers, occasional smokers, or long-term former smokers. No elevation was seen for hemorrhagic stroke. Relative risk estimates were similar using ever rather than current exposure, or total rather than spousal exposure. Eleven studies provided dose-response estimates, the combined relative risk for the highest exposure level being 1.56 (1.37-1.79). Many studies have evident weaknesses, recall bias, and particularly publication bias being major concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Although other reviewers inferred a causal relationship, we consider the evidence does not conclusively demonstrate this. We repeat our call for publication of data from existing large prospective studies.
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to review the epidemiological evidence relating environmental tobacco smoke exposure to stroke in never smokers. METHODS: The study is similar to our review in 2006, with searches extended to March 2016. RESULTS: Twelve further studies were identified. A total of 28 studies varied considerably in design, exposure indices used, and disease definition. Based on 39 sex-specific estimates and the exposure index current spousal exposure (or nearest equivalent), the meta-analysis gave an overall fixed-effect relative risk estimate of 1.23 (95% confidence interval: 1.16-1.31), with significant (P < .05) heterogeneity. There was no significant heterogeneity by sex, continent, fatality, disease end point, or degree of adjustment for potential confounding factors. Relative risks were less elevated in prospective studies (1.15, 1.06-1.24) than in case-control studies (1.44, 1.22-1.60) or cross-sectional studies (1.40, 1.21-1.61). They also varied by publication year, but with no trend. A significant increase was not seen in studies that excluded smokers of any tobacco (1.07, .97-1.17), but was seen for studies that included pipe- or cigar-only smokers, occasional smokers, or long-term former smokers. No elevation was seen for hemorrhagic stroke. Relative risk estimates were similar using ever rather than current exposure, or total rather than spousal exposure. Eleven studies provided dose-response estimates, the combined relative risk for the highest exposure level being 1.56 (1.37-1.79). Many studies have evident weaknesses, recall bias, and particularly publication bias being major concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Although other reviewers inferred a causal relationship, we consider the evidence does not conclusively demonstrate this. We repeat our call for publication of data from existing large prospective studies.
Authors: Gregory Y H Lip; Deirdre A Lane; Radosław Lenarczyk; Giuseppe Boriani; Wolfram Doehner; Laura A Benjamin; Marc Fisher; Deborah Lowe; Ralph L Sacco; Renate Schnabel; Caroline Watkins; George Ntaios; Tatjana Potpara Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 35.855
Authors: David Rojas-Rueda; Emily Morales-Zamora; Wael Abdullah Alsufyani; Christopher H Herbst; Salem M AlBalawi; Reem Alsukait; Mashael Alomran Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anas A Abu Jad; Anvesh Ravanavena; Chetna Ravindra; Emmanuelar O Igweonu-Nwakile; Safina Ali; Salomi Paul; Shreyas Yakkali; Sneha Teresa Selvin; Sonu Thomas; Viktoriya Bikeyeva; Ahmed Abdullah; Aleksandra Radivojevic; Prachi Balani Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-09-15