Literature DB >> 27765500

Loss of reduction and complications of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with autogenous tendon graft in acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Nam Hong Choi1, Seok Min Lim1, Sang Young Lee1, Tae Kang Lim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to report loss of reduction and complications after single-tunnel coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction with autogenous semitendinosus tendon graft for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations.
METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with acute, unstable AC dislocations (surgery within 6 weeks after trauma). We excluded patients with chronic injury and distal clavicle fractures with CC ligaments disruption. We measured the CC distance on anteroposterior radiographs of both clavicles, preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the final follow-up visit. We evaluated clinical outcomes using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Assessment and the University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale scores and perioperative complications.
RESULTS: There were 30 patients (27 men and 3 women) with mean age of 41 years (range, 19-70 years). The mean follow-up period was 31 months (range, 12-186 months). Mean CC distance was 15.5 ± 3.7 mm (84% ± 14% of the contralateral shoulder) preoperatively, 8.9 ± 2.6 mm (9% ± 40%) immediately postoperatively (P < .001), and 10.6 ± 3.3 mm (24% ± 39%) at the final assessment (P < .001), showing an increase of the CC distance during the follow-up. Loss of reduction (defined as >25% increase of CC distance) developed in 14 patients (47%), and complications occurred in 6 patients (20%), including 3 distal clavicle fractures through the tunnel. Final clinical scores were significantly lower in patients with complications (27 vs. 33 of the University of California, Los Angeles assessment [P < .001] and 81 vs. 95 of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder assessment [P < .001]).
CONCLUSION: In acute AC joint dislocation, single-tunnel CC ligament reconstruction using autogenous tendon graft resulted in loss of reduction rate of 47% and a complication rate of 20%. The development of complications adversely affected clinical outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AC joint; acute, acromioclavicular joint; complication; reconstruction; tendon graft

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27765500     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  20 in total

Review 1.  Allo- and autografts show comparable outcomes in chronic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Eigenschink; Philipp R Heuberer; Leo Pauzenberger; Grant E Garrigues; Leonard Achenbach; Sigbjorn Dimmen; Brenda Laky; Lior Laver
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Radiographic features and complications following coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian P Kennedy; Zehava Sadka Rosenberg; Michael J Alaia; Mohammad Samim; Erin F Alaia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligament with palmaris longus tendon and Mersilene tape for acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  Yoon-Min Lee; Joo Dong Yeo; Zin Ouk Hwang; Seok-Whan Song; Yoo Joon Sur
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyra A Benavent; Dafang Zhang; Elizabeth G Matzkin; Brandon E Earp
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-10

Review 5.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The importance of biomechanical properties in revision acromioclavicular joint stabilization: a scoping review.

Authors:  Felix Dyrna; Daniel P Berthold; Matthias J Feucht; Lukas N Muench; Frank Martetschläger; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jordan D Walters; Anthony Ignozzi; Francis Bustos; Brian C Werner; Stephen F Brockmeier
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-24

Review 8.  New insights in the treatment of acromioclavicular separation.

Authors:  Christiaan J A van Bergen; Annelies F van Bemmel; Tjarco D W Alta; Arthur van Noort
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-12-18

9.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with Bosworth screw and additional K-wiring: results after 7.8 years - still an adequate procedure?

Authors:  Thomas M Tiefenboeck; Domenik Popp; Sandra Boesmueller; Stephan Payr; Julian Joestl; Micha Komjati; Harald Binder; Mark Schurz; Roman C Ostermann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Modified closed-loop double-endobutton technique for repair of rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Xin Zhou; Ji Qi; Yan Zeng; Shaoqun Zhang; Gang Liu; Ruiyue Ping; Yikai Li; Shijie Fu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.