Literature DB >> 27765455

Evaluating the Effect of Comorbidities on the Success, Risk, and Cost of Digital Replantation.

Joshua W Hustedt1, Andrew Chung2, Daniel D Bohl3, Neil Olmscheid2, Scott Edwards4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The clinical decision to replant an amputated digit is driven primarily by surgical indication. However, the extent to which patient comorbidity should play into this decision is less well defined. This study was designed to determine the effect of patient comorbidities on the success, risk, and cost of digital replantation.
METHODS: All amputation injuries and digital replantation procedures captured by the National Inpatient Sample during 2001 to 2012 were identified. A successful replantation procedure was defined as one in which a replantation occurred without a subsequent revision amputation. Patient comorbidities were tested for association with failure of replantation, risk of postoperative complications, and overall hospital costs.
RESULTS: We identified 11,788 digital replantation procedures. A total of 3,604 patients (30.6%) experienced revascularization failure associated with replantation. The risk for replant failure was highest among patients with psychotic disorders, peripheral vascular disease, and electrolyte imbalances. The risk for postoperative complications was highest among patients with electrolyte imbalances, drug abuse, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Hospital costs were greatest among patients with deficiency anemias, electrolyte imbalances, or psychotic disorders. Patients with more than 3 comorbidities experienced significantly higher failure, risk of postoperative complications, and cost of digital replantation.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that even when surgical indications are met, patients with more than 3 comorbidities and those who have a history of alcohol abuse, deficiency anemias, electrolyte imbalances, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, or psychotic disorders are at increased risk of replantation failure and associated postoperative complications. Assessment of this risk should have a role in decision making regarding whether a digit should be replanted. Patients at high risk should be carefully counseled regarding the difficult perioperative course before undergoing digital replantation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic III. Copyright Â
© 2016 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hand surgery; amputation traumatic; comorbidity; orthopedics; replantation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27765455     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Strategies for complex injuries of the hand].

Authors:  H Vester; S Deiler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Outcomes Following Replantation/Revascularization in the Hand.

Authors:  Hoyune E Cho; Sandra V Kotsis; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.907

3.  Preoperative Deficiency Anemia in Digital Replantation: A Marker of Disparities, Increased Length of Stay, and Hospital Cost.

Authors:  Fouad Chouairi; Michael R Mercier; Michael Alperovich; James Clune; Adnan Prsic
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2020-06-28

4.  Predictors of Success following Microvascular Replantation Surgery of the Upper Extremity in Adult Patients.

Authors:  Kayla R Rizzo; Michael D Eckhoff; Gilberto A Gonzalez; Shawn Diamond; Leon Nesti; John C Dunn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-09-14

5.  Pediatric Digit Replantation Following Traumatic Amputation: Nationwide Analysis of Patient Selection, Outcomes, and Cost.

Authors:  Neill Y Li; Justin E Kleiner; Andrew P Harris; Avi D Goodman; Julia A Katarincic
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-09-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.