Literature DB >> 27765293

Effectiveness of one dose of oral cholera vaccine in response to an outbreak: a case-cohort study.

Andrew S Azman1, Lucy A Parker2, John Rumunu3, Fisseha Tadesse4, Francesco Grandesso4, Lul L Deng3, Richard Laku Lino3, Bior K Bior3, Michael Lasuba3, Anne-Laure Page4, Lameck Ontweka5, Augusto E Llosa4, Sandra Cohuet4, Lorenzo Pezzoli6, Dossou Vincent Sodjinou7, Abdinasir Abubakar8, Amanda K Debes9, Allan M Mpairwe10, Joseph F Wamala10, Christine Jamet11, Justin Lessler12, David A Sack9, Marie-Laure Quilici13, Iza Ciglenecki11, Francisco J Luquero14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral cholera vaccines represent a new effective tool to fight cholera and are licensed as two-dose regimens with 2-4 weeks between doses. Evidence from previous studies suggests that a single dose of oral cholera vaccine might provide substantial direct protection against cholera. During a cholera outbreak in May, 2015, in Juba, South Sudan, the Ministry of Health, Médecins Sans Frontières, and partners engaged in the first field deployment of a single dose of oral cholera vaccine to enhance the outbreak response. We did a vaccine effectiveness study in conjunction with this large public health intervention.
METHODS: We did a case-cohort study, combining information on the vaccination status and disease outcomes from a random cohort recruited from throughout the city of Juba with that from all the cases detected. Eligible cases were those aged 1 year or older on the first day of the vaccination campaign who sought care for diarrhoea at all three cholera treatment centres and seven rehydration posts throughout Juba. Confirmed cases were suspected cases who tested positive to PCR for Vibrio cholerae O1. We estimated the short-term protection (direct and indirect) conferred by one dose of cholera vaccine (Shanchol, Shantha Biotechnics, Hyderabad, India).
FINDINGS: Between Aug 9, 2015, and Sept 29, 2015, we enrolled 87 individuals with suspected cholera, and an 898-person cohort from throughout Juba. Of the 87 individuals with suspected cholera, 34 were classified as cholera positive, 52 as cholera negative, and one had indeterminate results. Of the 858 cohort members who completed a follow-up visit, none developed clinical cholera during follow-up. The unadjusted single-dose vaccine effectiveness was 80·2% (95% CI 61·5-100·0) and after adjusting for potential confounders was 87·3% (70·2-100·0).
INTERPRETATION: One dose of Shanchol was effective in preventing medically attended cholera in this study. These results support the use of a single-dose strategy in outbreaks in similar epidemiological settings. FUNDING: Médecins Sans Frontières.
Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27765293     DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30211-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Glob Health        ISSN: 2214-109X            Impact factor:   26.763


  44 in total

1.  Mitigating Cholera in the Aftermath of Cyclone Idai.

Authors:  Wilbur H Chen; Andrew S Azman
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Measurement of Vaccine Direct Effects Under the Test-Negative Design.

Authors:  Joseph A Lewnard; Christine Tedijanto; Benjamin J Cowling; Marc Lipsitch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Challenges in estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness.

Authors:  Kylie E C Ainslie; Michael Haber; Walt A Orenstein
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 5.217

4.  Comparison of two control groups for estimation of oral cholera vaccine effectiveness using a case-control study design.

Authors:  Molly F Franke; J Gregory Jerome; Wilfredo R Matias; Ralph Ternier; Isabelle J Hilaire; Jason B Harris; Louise C Ivers
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Yemen in a Time of Cholera: Current Situation and Challenges.

Authors:  Hesham M Al-Mekhlafi
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Temporal Confounding in the Test-Negative Design.

Authors:  Natalie E Dean; M Elizabeth Halloran; Ira M Longini
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  The Use of Test-negative Controls to Monitor Vaccine Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of Methodology.

Authors:  Huiying Chua; Shuo Feng; Joseph A Lewnard; Sheena G Sullivan; Christopher C Blyth; Marc Lipsitch; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Spatial clustering of cholera cases in the Kathmandu Valley: implications for a ring vaccination strategy.

Authors:  Mellisa Roskosky; Mohammad Ali; Shyam Raj Upreti; David Sack
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.473

9.  Cholera.

Authors:  William Davis; Rupa Narra; Eric D Mintz
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2018-07-27

10.  Incubation periods impact the spatial predictability of cholera and Ebola outbreaks in Sierra Leone.

Authors:  Rebecca Kahn; Corey M Peak; Juan Fernández-Gracia; Alexandra Hill; Amara Jambai; Louisa Ganda; Marcia C Castro; Caroline O Buckee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.