| Literature DB >> 27764914 |
Janine Donaldson1, Michael Taurai Madziva1, Kennedy Honey Erlwanger1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to investigate the impact of high-fat diets composed of different animal and vegetable fat sources on serum metabolic health markers in Japanese quail, as well as the overall lipid content and fatty acid profiles of the edible bird tissues following significantly increased dietary lipid supplementation.Entities:
Keywords: High-fat Diets; Japanese Quail; Metabolic Health Markers; Tissue Fatty Acid Profile
Year: 2016 PMID: 27764914 PMCID: PMC5411830 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.16.0486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Proximate content of the standard and high-fat diets fed to male Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) for 12 weeks1)
| Proximate component (%) | Diets | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| STD | CO | L | PO | SO | SuO | |
| Protein | 16.03 (0.51) | 11.66 (0.34) | 14.91 (2.64) | 14.61 (0.47) | 11.71 (0.15) | 11.90 (0.13) |
| Fat | 3.66 (0.08) | 23.28 (0.79) | 22.44 (1.07) | 24.39 (0.49) | 26.13 (0.39) | 22.28 (0.70) |
| Energy (MJ/kg) | 15.85 (0.03) | 19.68 (0.28) | 19.51 (1.03) | 20.87 (1.42) | 20.02 (0.76) | 20.45 (0.20) |
STD, standard diet; CO, coconut oil; L, lard; PO, palm oil; SO, soyabean oil; SuO, sunflower oil.
Proximate component data presented as mean (standard deviation), n = 2 composite samples of each diet.
Fat was added at 22% on a weight/weight basis.
p<0.0001 when various dietary groups compared to STD (one-way analysis of variance);
p<0.05 when various dietary groups compared to STD (one-way analysis of variance).
Fatty acid profiles of dietary fats added to high-fat diets fed to male Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) for 12 weeks1)
| Fatty acid | Added dietary fats | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| CO | L | PO | SO | SuO | |
| C8:0 (Caprylic acid) | 5.55 | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| C10:0 (Capric acid) | 6.21 | 0.11 | 0.02 | nd | nd |
| C14:0 (Myristic acid) | 19.47 | 1.52 | 1.07 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| C16:0 (Palmitic acid) | 8.54 | 27.46 | 37.65 | 10.00 | 5.72 |
| C16:1 (Palmitoleic acid) | 0.01 | 1.77 | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| C18:0 (Stearic acid) | 3.14 | 17.54 | 3.85 | 5.04 | 5.44 |
| C18:1 ω-9 (Oleic acid) | 4.91 | 36.40 | 44.41 | 25.25 | 30.54 |
| C18:2 ω-6 (Linoleic acid) | 0.82 | 11.90 | 11.35 | 52.87 | 55.96 |
| C18:3 ω-3 (Alpha-linolenic acid) | nd | 0.60 | 0.23 | 4.88 | 0.09 |
| C22:0 (Behenic acid) | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| C13:0 (Tridecyclic acid) | 51.07 | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| Saturated FA | 94.16 | 47.69 | 43.56 | 16.58 | 13.12 |
| Monounsaturated FA | 4.97 | 38.90 | 44.76 | 25.57 | 30.79 |
| Polyunsaturated FA | 0.87 | 13.03 | 11.61 | 57.82 | 56.08 |
| Cis FA | 5.73 | 47.91 | 55.69 | 78.08 | 86.48 |
| ω-3 FA | 0.01 | 0.65 | 0.23 | 4.88 | 0.09 |
| ω-6 FA | 0.84 | 12.10 | 11.93 | 52.89 | 55.96 |
| ω-9 FA | 4.92 | 36.41 | 44.41 | 25.25 | 30.55 |
| ω6:ω3 | 59.93:1 | 18.67:1 | 52.56:1 | 10.85:1 | 643.26:1 |
| SFA:UFA | 16.12:1 | 0.92:1 | 0.77:1 | 0.20:1 | 0.15:1 |
CO, coconut oil; L, lard; PO, palm oil; SO, soyabean oil; SuO, sunflower oil; nd, not detected (below detectable threshold); FA, fatty acids; SFA, saturated fatty acids; UFA, unsaturated fatty acids.
Fatty acid data presesnted as a percentage of total fatty acids within the added dietary fats.
Figure 1The initial (time: 0 weeks) and final (after 12 weeks of feeding) body masses (A) and percentage body mass gain (B) of male, Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) fed either standard, commercial poultry feed (STD, standard diet) or one of five different high-fat diets. 57, four-week old, male Japanese quail were randomly assigned to 6 dietary groups and fed their respective diets for 12 weeks. Group 1 received standard, commercial poultry feed. Groups 2–6 received the standard, commercial poultry feed enriched with 22% added fat (on a weight/weight basis). The added fat was in the form of coconut oil (CO), lard (L), palm oil (PO), soyabean oil (SO), or sunflower oil (SuO). Data represented as means±standard deviation. n = 10 (soyabean oil and palm oil groups); n = 9 (sunflower oil and standard diet groups); n = 11 (coconut oil group); n = 8 (lard group). (A) ** p<0.01 when comparing initial versus final body mass within each individual dietary group. (B) ** p<0.01 and *** p<0.001 when comparing birds in the soyabean and sunflower oil groups, respectively, to the standard diet group.
Figure 2The glucose tolerance test curves (A) and area under the glucose curve (B) of male, Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) fed either standard, commercial poultry feed (STD, standard diet) or one of five different high-fat diets. 57, four-week old, male Japanese quail were randomly assigned to 6 dietary groups and fed their respective diets for 12 weeks. Group 1 received standard, commercial poultry feed. Groups 2–6 received the standard, commercial poultry feed enriched with 22% added fat (on a weight/weight basis). The added fat was in the form of coconut oil (CO), lard (L), palm oil (PO), soyabean oil (SO) or sunflower oil (SuO). Data represented as means±standard deviation. n = 10 (soyabean oil and palm oil groups); n = 9 (sunflower oil and standard diet groups); n = 11 (coconut oil group); n = 8 (lard group). ** p<0.05 when comparing peak blood glucose concentrations, following an oral glucose load, to baseline blood glucose concentrations within each individual dietary group.
Serum parameters (metabolic/health markers) of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) following 12 weeks of either standard or high-fat diet feeding1)2),3)
| Serum parameters | Dietary groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| STD | CO | L | PO | SO | SuO | |
| Uric (mg/dL) | 7.3 (1.9) | 7.3 (3.1) | 5.0 (1.4) | 4.6 (1.9) | 6.1 (2.8) | 7.4 (2.9) |
| TPro (g/dL) | 3.1 (0.3) | 3.6 (0.8) | 3.1 (0.5) | 3.2 (0.7) | 3.7 (0.8) | 3.0 (0.4) |
| Alb (g/dL) | 0.6 (0.2) | 0.8 (0.4) | 0.7 (0.4) | 0.7 (0.3) | 1.0 (0.4) | 0.6 (0.2) |
| AST (U/L) | 608.5 (123.1) | 457.4 (160.8) | 494.0 (196.6) | 400.2 (101.3) | 521.0 (207.1) | 408.5 (138.2) |
| TBil (mg/dL) | 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | 0.2 (0.1–1.3) | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | 0.1 (0.1–0.8) | 0.1 (0.1–0.6) | 0.1 (0.1–0.2) |
| Chol (mg/dL) | 206.0 (179.0–358.5) | 226.0 (201.5–235.5) | 195.0 (186.0–202.3) | 184.5 (156.0–205.0) | 203.5 (178.0–218.0) | 207.0 (189.0–217.5) |
| Trig (mg/dL) | 238.4 (65.8) | 130.7 (48.0)# | 148.9 (64.7) | 144.7 (54.7) | 108.7 (38.0) | 120.1 (41.8) |
STD, standard diet; CO, coconut oil; L, lard; PO, palm oil; SO, soyabean oil; SuO, sunflower oil; Uric, uric acid; TPro, total protein; Alb, Albumin; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; Tbil, total bilirubin; Chol, cholesterol; Trig, triglycerides.
Cholesterol and triglyceride data published in a previous manuscript, based on the same birds in a study performed by our lab (Donaldson et al [13]).
n = 10 (soyabean oil, palm oil and coconut oil groups); n = 9 (sunflower oil and standard diet groups); n = 7 (lard group).
Data represented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range).
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001 when comparing the various high-fat diet groups to the standard diet group.
Absolute and relative liver mass and total lipid yield of liver samples from male Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) following 12 weeks of either standard or high-fat diet feeding1)
| Dietary groups | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| STD | CO | L | PO | SO | SuO | |
| Absolute liver mass (g) | 3.1 (0.67) | 2.93 (0.59) | 2.94 (0.40) | 3.02 (0.61) | 3.16 (0.88) | 2.51 (0.44) |
| Relative liver mass (%) | 1.87 (0.33) | 1.65 (0.28) | 1.68 (0.33) | 1.72 (0.31) | 1.68 (0.59) | 1.30 (0.24) |
| Liver lipid yield (% of tissue) | 2.36 | 2.13 | 1.94 | 2.04 | 2.05 | 1.76 |
STD, standard; CO, coconut oil; L, lard; PO, palm oil; SO, soyabean oil; SuO, sunflower oil.
Liver mass data presented as mean (standard deviation). Liver lipid yield data presented as a percentage of total tissue sample.
p<0.05 when comparing the relative liver mass in the STD group to that of the SuO group.
Fatty acid profiles of the liver samples from male Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) following 12 weeks of either standard or high-fat diet feeding1)
| Fatty acid | Dietary groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| STD | CO | L | PO | SO | SuO | |
| C12:0 (Lauric acid) | 0.10 | 6.33 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
| C14:0 (Myristic acid) | 0.58 | 5.61 | 0.72 | w0.38 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| C16:0 (Palmitic acid) | 24.90 | 19.57 | 24.06 | 20.35 | 14.41 | 14.13 |
| C16:1 (Palmitoleic acid) | 4.04 | 1.63 | 1.19 | 0.68 | 0.40 | 0.41 |
| C18:0 (Stearic acid) | 13.97 | 17.66 | 16.64 | 16.60 | 18.60 | 20.05 |
| C18:1 ω-9 (Oleic acid) | 31.05 | 18.35 | 26.17 | 29.55 | 14.34 | 15.16 |
| C18:2 ω-6 (Linoleic acid) | 13.51 | 15.45 | 18.64 | 18.71 | 35.56 | 35.71 |
| C18:3 ω-3 (Alpha-linolenic acid) | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.32 | 0.16 | 1.04 | 0.11 |
| C20:4 ω-6 (Arachidonic acid) | 6.86 | 7.83 | 6.65 | 9.42 | 8.33 | 10.48 |
| C23:0 (Tricosanoic acid) | 0.59 | 2.12 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
| C22:6 ω-3 (Docosahexaenoic acid) | 0.11 | 0.16 | 2.51 | 1.61 | 4.34 | 0.86 |
| Saturated FA | 41.13 | 52.57 | 42.80 | 38.36 | 34.29 | 35.65 |
| Monounsaturated FA | 35.78 | 21.04 | 27.88 | 30.56 | 15.22 | 15.74 |
| Polyunsaturated FA | 22.88 | 26.25 | 29.17 | 31.01 | 50.44 | 48.53 |
| Cis FA | 44.34 | 33.66 | 44.65 | 48.20 | 49.86 | 50.80 |
| ω-3 FA | 1.00 | 1.09 | 3.01 | 1.93 | 5.54 | 1.06 |
| ω-6 FA | 21.27 | 24.41 | 25.86 | 28.97 | 44.52 | 46.94 |
| DHA | 0.11 | 0.16 | 2.51 | 1.61 | 4.34 | 0.86 |
| ω-9 FA | 31.06 | 18.57 | 26.17 | 29.55 | 14.34 | 15.16 |
| ω6:ω3 | 21.27:1 | 22.39:1 | 8.59:1 | 15.01:1 | 8.04:1 | 44.28:1 |
| SFA:UFA | 0.70:1 | 1.11:1 | 0.75:1 | 0.62:1 | 0.52:1 | 0.55:1 |
STD, standard diet; CO, coconut oil; L, lard; PO, palm oil; SO, soyabean oil; SuO, sunflower oil; FA, fatty acids; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; SFA, saturated fatty acids; UFA, unsaturated fatty acids.
Fatty acid data presented as a percentage of total fatty acids within composite tissue sample.
Figure 3The percentage lipid yield of the breast and thigh muscle tissue of male, Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) fed either standard, commercial poultry feed (STD, standard diet) or one of five different high-fat diets. 57, four-week old, male Japanese quail were randomly assigned to 6 dietary groups and fed their respective diets for 12 weeks. Group 1 received standard, commercial poultry feed. Groups 2–6 received the standard, commercial poultry feed enriched with 22% added fat (on a weight/weight basis). The added fat was in the form of coconut oil (CO), lard (L), palm oil (PO), soybean oil (SO), or sunflower oil (SuO). Data represented as means. n = 1 for all dietary groups [liver and muscle samples were collected from each bird, in each specific dietary group (minimum of n = 8 birds in each group) and analysed as a composite (representative sample) from each group].
Fatty acid profiles of the breast muscle samples from male Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) following 12 weeks of either standard or high-fat diet feeding1)
| Fatty acid | Dietary groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| STD | CO | L | PO | SO | SuO | |
| C12:0 (Lauric acid) | 0.06 | 14.84 | 0.29 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| C14:0 (Myristic acid) | 0.67 | 10.69 | 0.94 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.46 |
| C14:1 (Myristoleic acid) | 0.11 | 1.02 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | nd |
| C16:0 (Palmitic acid) | 20.61 | 16.46 | 22.54 | 18.25 | 17.92 | 14.79 |
| C16:1 (Palmitoleic acid) | 7.94 | 4.68 | 2.91 | 2.04 | 1.64 | 1.04 |
| C18:0 (Stearic acid) | 6.72 | 7.44 | 9.55 | 6.73 | 7.92 | 8.06 |
| C18:1 ω-9 (Oleic acid) | 41.89 | 25.24 | 39.39 | 49.34 | 31.46 | 30.58 |
| C18:2 ω-6 (Linoleic acid) | 17.61 | 13.82 | 17.99 | 17.54 | 35.04 | 41.90 |
| C18:3 ω-3 (Alpha-linolenic acid) | 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.45 | 0.24 | 1.37 | 0.25 |
| C20:4 ω-6 (Arachidonic acid) | 2.78 | 3.54 | 2.66 | 3.70 | 2.39 | 1.57 |
| Saturated FA | 28.39 | 50.29 | 34.26 | 25.97 | 27.04 | 23.93 |
| Monounsaturated FA | 50.28 | 31.26 | 43.16 | 51.80 | 31.73 | 30.54 |
| Polyunsaturated FA | 21.17 | 18.33 | 22.46 | 22.23 | 39.51 | 44.09 |
| Trans FA | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 1.73 | 1.41 |
| Cis FA | 59.28 | 38.98 | 57.30 | 66.83 | 64.78 | 71.07 |
| ω-3 FA | 0.56 | 0.61 | 1.23 | 0.62 | 1.81 | 0.50 |
| ω-6 FA | 20.56 | 17.60 | 20.86 | 21.42 | 37.57 | 43.60 |
| ω-9 FA | 41.94 | 25.29 | 39.55 | 49.34 | 31.42 | 30.58 |
| ω6:ω3 | 37.00:1 | 28.87:1 | 16.97:1 | 34.77:1 | 20.71:1 | 87.92:1 |
| SFA:UFA | 0.40:1 | 1.01:1 | 0.52:1 | 0.35:1 | 0.38:1 | 0.32:1 |
STD, standard diet; CO, coconut oil; L, lard; PO, palm oil; SO, soyabean oil; SuO, sunflower oil; FA, fatty acids; SFA, saturated fatty acids; UFA, unsaturated fatty acids; nd, not detected (below detectable threshold).
Fatty acid data presented as a percentage of total fatty acids within composite tissue sample.
Fatty acid profiles of the thigh muscle samples from male Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) following 12 weeks of either standard or high-fat diet feeding1)
| Fatty acid | Dietary groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| STD | CO | L | PO | SO | SuO | |
| C12:0 (Lauric acid) | 0.26 | 37.06 | 0.25 | 2.36 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
| C14:0 (Myristic acid) | 0.75 | 14.90 | 1.21 | 1.48 | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| C16:0 (Palmitic acid) | 19.51 | 11.13 | 26.61 | 18.08 | 10.97 | 9.20 |
| C16:1 (Palmitoleic acid) | 6.29 | 2.65 | 2.05 | 1.28 | 0.89 | 0.54 |
| C18:0 (Stearic acid) | 4.83 | 3.63 | 7.95 | 3.60 | 4.49 | 5.99 |
| C18:1 ω-9 (Oleic acid) | 40.79 | 16.57 | 39.62 | 52.22 | 29.24 | 29.89 |
| C18:2 ω-6 (Linoleic acid) | 25.02 | 10.64 | 19.00 | 19.19 | 50.21 | 51.93 |
| C18:3 ω-3 (Alpha-linolenic acid) | 0.64 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.24 | 2.06 | 0.21 |
| Saturated FA | 25.69 | 67.75 | 36.70 | 25.86 | 16.32 | 16.10 |
| Monounsaturated FA | 47.49 | 20.29 | 40.42 | 53.84 | 30.47 | 30.70 |
| Polyunsaturated FA | 26.67 | 11.86 | 21.00 | 20.27 | 53.16 | 53.21 |
| Trans FA | 0.15 | 0.05 | 1.88 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.05 |
| Cis FA | 65.66 | 27.16 | 56.70 | 71.38 | 79.43 | 81.77 |
| ω-3 FA | 0.75 | 0.34 | 0.88 | 0.34 | 2.22 | 0.27 |
| ω-6 FA | 25.88 | 15.88 | 20.00 | 19.90 | 50.84 | 52.83 |
| ω-9 FA | 40.79 | 16.57 | 39.62 | 52.22 | 29.27 | 29.89 |
| ω6:ω3 | 34.55:1 | 46.29:1 | 22.76:1 | 59.10:1 | 2.91:1 | 197.60:1 |
| SFA:UFA | 0.35:1 | 2.11:1 | 0.60:1 | 0.35:1 | 0.20:1 | 0.19:1 |
STD, standard diet; CO, coconut oil; L, lard; PO, palm oil; SO, soyabean oil; SuO, sunflower oil; FA, fatty acids; SFA, saturated fatty acids; UFA, unsaturated fatty acids.
Fatty acid data presented as a percentage of total fatty acids within composite tissue sample.