Literature DB >> 27764894

Predicting stomatal responses to the environment from the optimization of photosynthetic gain and hydraulic cost.

John S Sperry1, Martin D Venturas1, William R L Anderegg1, Maurizio Mencuccini2,3, D Scott Mackay4, Yujie Wang1, David M Love1.   

Abstract

Stomatal regulation presumably evolved to optimize CO2 for H2 O exchange in response to changing conditions. If the optimization criterion can be readily measured or calculated, then stomatal responses can be efficiently modelled without recourse to empirical models or underlying mechanism. Previous efforts have been challenged by the lack of a transparent index for the cost of losing water. Yet it is accepted that stomata control water loss to avoid excessive loss of hydraulic conductance from cavitation and soil drying. Proximity to hydraulic failure and desiccation can represent the cost of water loss. If at any given instant, the stomatal aperture adjusts to maximize the instantaneous difference between photosynthetic gain and hydraulic cost, then a model can predict the trajectory of stomatal responses to changes in environment across time. Results of this optimization model are consistent with the widely used Ball-Berry-Leuning empirical model (r2  > 0.99) across a wide range of vapour pressure deficits and ambient CO2 concentrations for wet soil. The advantage of the optimization approach is the absence of empirical coefficients, applicability to dry as well as wet soil and prediction of plant hydraulic status along with gas exchange.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ball-Berry-Leuning model; Cowan-Farquhar optimization; hydraulic limitations; photosynthetic optimization; plant drought responses; plant gas exchange; stomatal modelling; stomatal regulation; xylem cavitation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27764894     DOI: 10.1111/pce.12852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  27 in total

1.  Dry Deposition of Ozone over Land: Processes, Measurement, and Modeling.

Authors:  Olivia E Clifton; Arlene M Fiore; William J Massman; Colleen B Baublitz; Mhairi Coyle; Lisa Emberson; Silvano Fares; Delphine K Farmer; Pierre Gentine; Giacomo Gerosa; Alex B Guenther; Detlev Helmig; Danica L Lombardozzi; J William Munger; Edward G Patton; Sally E Pusede; Donna B Schwede; Sam J Silva; Matthias Sörgel; Allison L Steiner; Amos P K Tai
Journal:  Rev Geophys       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 22.000

Review 2.  Modeling Stomatal Conductance.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Precipitation mediates sap flux sensitivity to evaporative demand in the neotropics.

Authors:  Charlotte Grossiord; Bradley Christoffersen; Aura M Alonso-Rodríguez; Kristina Anderson-Teixeira; Heidi Asbjornsen; Luiza Maria T Aparecido; Z Carter Berry; Christopher Baraloto; Damien Bonal; Isaac Borrego; Benoit Burban; Jeffrey Q Chambers; Danielle S Christianson; Matteo Detto; Boris Faybishenko; Clarissa G Fontes; Claire Fortunel; Bruno O Gimenez; Kolby J Jardine; Lara Kueppers; Gretchen R Miller; Georgianne W Moore; Robinson Negron-Juarez; Clément Stahl; Nathan G Swenson; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Charu Varadharajan; Jeffrey M Warren; Brett T Wolfe; Liang Wei; Tana E Wood; Chonggang Xu; Nate G McDowell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The impact of rising CO2 and acclimation on the response of US forests to global warming.

Authors:  John S Sperry; Martin D Venturas; Henry N Todd; Anna T Trugman; William R L Anderegg; Yujie Wang; Xiaonan Tai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Diurnal Variation in Gas Exchange: The Balance between Carbon Fixation and Water Loss.

Authors:  Jack S A Matthews; Silvere R M Vialet-Chabrand; Tracy Lawson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 6.  Catastrophic hydraulic failure and tipping points in plants.

Authors:  Daniel M Johnson; Gabriel Katul; Jean-Christophe Domec
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 7.947

7.  Optimization can provide the fundamental link between leaf photosynthesis, gas exchange and water relations.

Authors:  Ross M Deans; Timothy J Brodribb; Florian A Busch; Graham D Farquhar
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 15.793

8.  Coordination of plant hydraulic and photosynthetic traits: confronting optimality theory with field measurements.

Authors:  Huiying Xu; Han Wang; I Colin Prentice; Sandy P Harrison; Ian J Wright
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 10.323

9.  Arabidopsis thaliana Ei-5: Minor Vein Architecture Adjustment Compensates for Low Vein Density in Support of Photosynthesis.

Authors:  Jared J Stewart; Stephanie K Polutchko; Barbara Demmig-Adams; William W Adams
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Plant water potential improves prediction of empirical stomatal models.

Authors:  William R L Anderegg; Adam Wolf; Adriana Arango-Velez; Brendan Choat; Daniel J Chmura; Steven Jansen; Thomas Kolb; Shan Li; Frederick Meinzer; Pilar Pita; Víctor Resco de Dios; John S Sperry; Brett T Wolfe; Stephen Pacala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.