Literature DB >> 27764055

Patient Satisfaction is Not Associated With Self-reported Disability in a Spine Patient Population.

Amir M Abtahi1, Kade Shumway Lyman, Darrel S Brodke, Brandon D Lawrence, Chong Zhang, William Ryan Spiker.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective review.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between patient functional status and self-assessment of disability as measured by 3 commonly used clinical assessment instruments-the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the EuroQol (EQ)-5D and patient satisfaction scores in a spine surgery clinic population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patient satisfaction surveys, which measure the "patient experience of care" are becoming an increasingly important measure of the quality of medical care. Despite the widespread use of patient satisfaction surveys, little is known about the relationship between patient satisfaction and patient functional status or self-assessed level of disability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of 231 consecutive patients presenting to a single academic spine surgery center between February 2011 and October 2013 who completed both a patient satisfaction survey as well as one or more patient-reported outcome questionnaires (NDI, ODI, and/or EQ-5D) for a single clinical encounter. Statistical analysis was performed to determine if an association exists between the overall patient satisfaction score and each patient-reported outcome score.
RESULTS: Spearman correlation coefficients demonstrated no correlation between any patient-reported outcome score and the patient satisfaction score [NDI=-0.113 (-0.409 to 0.207) P=0.489] [ODI=-0.008 (-0.149 to 0.133) P=0.912] [EQ-5D=0.011 (-0.119 to 0.140) P=0.872] for a single clinical encounter.
CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence against an association between patient-reported functional status or self-assessed level of disability and patient satisfaction in a spine patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27764055     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  5 in total

1.  Lumbar microdecompression in elderly versus general adult patients: Comparable outcomes and costs despite group differences.

Authors:  Ziyad O Knio; Samuel Rosas; Michael S Schallmo; Suman Medda; Tadhg J O'Gara
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-11

2.  Predictors of Patient Satisfaction in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brandon M Lehrich; Khodayar Goshtasbi; Nolan J Brown; Shane Shahrestani; Brian V Lien; Seth C Ransom; Ali R Tafreshi; Ryan C Ransom; Alvin Y Chan; Luis D Diaz-Aguilar; Ronald Sahyouni; Martin H Pham; Joseph A Osorio; Michael Y Oh
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Factors related to subjective satisfaction following microendoscopic foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Juichi Tonosu; Hirohiko Inanami; Hiroyuki Oka; Yuichi Takano; Hisashi Koga; Yohei Yuzawa; Ryutaro Shiboi; Yasushi Oshima; Satoshi Baba; Sakae Tanaka; Ko Matsudaira
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Factors Associated With Patient Satisfaction Measured Using a Guttman-Type Scale.

Authors:  Yvonne Versluijs; Laura E Brown; Mauna Rao; Amanda I Gonzalez; Matthew D Driscoll; David Ring
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2020-08-13

5.  The Correlation of Communication Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Yvonne Versluijs; Maartje Lemmers; Laura E Brown; Amanda I Gonzalez; Joost T P Kortlever; David Ring
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-03-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.