Literature DB >> 27763978

Evaluation of the Transverse Craniofacial Morphology of Adolescents With Repaired Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Suleyman Kutalmiş Buyuk1, Mevlut Celikoglu, Yasin Atakan Benkli, Ahmet Ercan Sekerci.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the transverse craniofacial morphology of the adolescent patients affected by unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and to compare the findings with age- and sex-matched control group without any cleft using their cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
METHODS: The study sample (n = 56 patients; mean age: 14.35 ± 3.06 years) consisted of 26 UCLP (n = 26 patients; 10 women and 16 men; mean age: 13.70 ± 2.94 years) and 30 control (n = 30 patients; 19 women and 11 men; mean age: 14.90 ± 3.10 years) subjects. Twenty-five conventional skeletal and dental tissue landmarks were identified. Twenty widely used frontal cephalometric variables (14 linear distances, 3 angles, and 3 ratios) were measured. The data were analyzed using the independent t-test between the groups.
RESULTS: Patients affected by UCLP had statistically significantly smaller interorbital width (89.83 ± 4.16 mm), maxillary width (58.02 ± 5.77 mm), maxillary intermolar width (52.83 ± 4.83 mm), and upper face height (57.64 ± 4.57 mm) (P < 0.05) compared with the control group. Conversely, ANS-isf distance was significantly greater in the UCLP group (29.62 ± 5.19 mm) than in the control group (26.74 ± 3.99 mm) (P = 0.023). Moreover, alveolar cleft width had significant effect on Cr-ANS (r = 0.446, P = 0.022) and the ANS-isf (r = 0.459, P = 0.018) measurements.
CONCLUSION: The UCLP group showed statistically significantly smaller values for interorbital width, maxillary width, maxillary intermolar width, and upper face height than the noncleft controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27763978     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  3 in total

1.  Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular volume in patients with cleft lip and palate during the deciduous dentition period.

Authors:  Abhishekhi Shrestha; Masahiro Takahashi; Tetsutaro Yamaguchi; Mohamed Adel; Mayu Furuhata; Yu Hikita; Hiroshi Yoshida; Takatoshi Nakawaki; Koutaro Maki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Craniofacial Analysis May Indicate Co-Occurrence of Skeletal Malocclusions and Associated Risks in Development of Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Denise K Liberton; Payal Verma; Konstantinia Almpani; Peter W Fung; Rashmi Mishra; Snehlata Oberoi; Figen Ç Şenel; James K Mah; John Huang; Bonnie L Padwa; Janice S Lee
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2020-01-28

3.  Frontal and Axial Evaluation of Craniofacial Morphology in Repaired Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Utilizing Cone Beam Computed Tomography; An Observational Study.

Authors:  Anuraj Singh Kochhar; Maninder Singh Sidhu; Mona Prabhakar; Ritasha Bhasin; Gulsheen Kaur Kochhar; Himanshu Dadlani; Gianrico Spagnuolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.