Literature DB >> 27763401

Merits, Demands, and Challenges of VSED.

Paul T Menzel.   

Abstract

VSED demands willful determination from those who do it. The requisite willfulness is an ethical strength, providing greater assurance of voluntariness. Dying by VSED has another major merit: its pace provides time for the person and loved ones to embrace death in a shared appreciation of life. Support from professional caregivers is important in making dying by VSED comfortable. If acknowledged by its providers, this need for professional support has ancillary benefits: accurate information is more likely to be communicated to patients, and professional caregivers help normalize VSED and minimize abuses. VSED faces a moral challenge when it is categorized as suicide. In an obvious sense, VSED is suicide: the person's intention is to die, and the means employed assuredly causes death. Being a form of suicide does not imply that VSED is morally impermissible. Pursued to hasten death in a last stage of life, it is a response to "terminal" situations. This contributes greatly to VSED's moral acceptability when perceived as suicide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27763401     DOI: 10.1353/nib.2016.0029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Narrat Inq Bioeth        ISSN: 2157-1740


  1 in total

1.  Biathanatos revisited: Anabaptist perspectives on voluntarily stopping eating and drinking in the face of terminal illness.

Authors:  Aubrey DeVeny Incorvaia
Journal:  Palliat Care Soc Pract       Date:  2022-05-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.