Literature DB >> 27762648

Histological grade provides significant prognostic information in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013.

Anna Ehinger1,2, Per Malmström1,3, Pär-Ola Bendahl1, Christopher W Elston4, Anna-Karin Falck5, Carina Forsare1, Dorthe Grabau1,6, Lisa Rydén7,8, Olle Stål9, Mårten Fernö1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The St Gallen surrogate definition of the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer consist of five subgroups based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2), and Ki-67. PgR and Ki-67 are used for discriminating between the 'Luminal A-like' and 'Luminal B-like (HER2-negative)' subtypes. Histological grade (G) has prognostic value in breast cancer; however, its relationship to the St Gallen subtypes is not clear. Based on a previous pilot study, we hypothesized that G could be a primary discriminator for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers that were G1 or G3, whereas Ki-67 and PgR could provide additional prognostic information specifically for patients with G2 tumors. To test this hypothesis, a larger patient cohort was examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred seventy-one patients (≥35 years of age, pT1-2, pN0-1) with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer and complete data for PgR, Ki-67, G, lymph node status, tumor size, age, and distant disease-free survival (DDFS; median follow-up 9.2 years) were included.
RESULTS: 'Luminal A-like' tumors were mostly G1 or G2 (90%) whereas 'Luminal B-like' tumors were mostly G2 or G3 (87%) and corresponded with good and poor DDFS, respectively. In 'Luminal B-like' tumors that were G1 (n = 23), no metastasis occurred, whereas 14 of 40 'Luminal A-like' tumors that were G3 metastasized. In the G2 subgroup, low PgR and high Ki-67 were associated with an increased risk of distant metastases, hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8 (0.95-3.4) and 1.5 (0.80-2.8), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative/G1 breast cancer have a good prognosis, similar to that of 'Luminal A-like', while those with ER-positive/HER2-negative/G3 breast cancer have a worse prognosis, similar to that of 'Luminal B-like', when assessed independently of PgR and Ki-67. Therapy decisions based on Ki-67 and PgR might thus be restricted to the subgroup G2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27762648     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1237778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  16 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Subtypes and Local-Regional Control of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Simona Maria Fragomeni; Andrew Sciallis; Jacqueline S Jeruss
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.495

2.  Clinical value of CTLA4 combined with clinicopathological factors in evaluating the prognosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Junyi Wu; Lei Li; Jiayi Chen; Yuan Liu; Junming Xu; Zhihai Peng
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

3.  Development and Validation of an MRI Radiomics-Based Signature to Predict Histological Grade in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shihui Wang; Yi Wei; Zhouli Li; Jingya Xu; Yunfeng Zhou
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2022-10-14

4.  Cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 expression predicts poor prognosis in luminal B HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Gaochen Lan; Jie Li; Qiaomei Wen; Lin Lin; Libin Chen; Liyu Chen; Xi Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Young age at diagnosis is associated with worse prognosis in the Luminal A breast cancer subtype: a retrospective institutional cohort study.

Authors:  Zhiyang Liu; Zeyad Sahli; Yongchun Wang; Antonio C Wolff; Leslie M Cope; Christopher B Umbricht
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Prognostic value of routine laboratory variables in prediction of breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Zhu Zhu; Ling Li; Zhong Ye; Tong Fu; Ye Du; Aiping Shi; Di Wu; Ke Li; Yifan Zhu; Chun Wang; Zhimin Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Agreement between molecular subtyping and surrogate subtype classification: a contemporary population-based study of ER-positive/HER2-negative primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Christine Lundgren; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Åke Borg; Anna Ehinger; Cecilia Hegardt; Christer Larsson; Niklas Loman; Martin Malmberg; Helena Olofsson; Lao H Saal; Tobias Sjöblom; Henrik Lindman; Marie Klintman; Jari Häkkinen; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Mårten Fernö; Lisa Rydén; Maria Ekholm
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Hybrid 18F-FDG-PET/MRI Measurement of Standardized Uptake Value Coupled with Yin Yang 1 Signature in Metastatic Breast Cancer. A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Concetta Schiano; Monica Franzese; Katia Pane; Nunzia Garbino; Andrea Soricelli; Marco Salvatore; Filomena de Nigris; Claudio Napoli
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Prognostic and clinicopathological value of Twist expression in breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weiqiang Qiao; Zhiqiang Jia; Heyang Liu; Qipeng Liu; Ting Zhang; Wanying Guo; Peng Li; Miao Deng; Sanqiang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Molecular determinants of post-mastectomy breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Kimberly S Keene; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Tari King; E Shelley Hwang; Bo Peng; Kandace P McGuire; Coya Tapia; Hong Zhang; Sejong Bae; Faina Nakhlis; Nancy Klauber-Demore; Ingrid Meszoely; Michael S Sabel; Shawna C Willey; Agda Karina Eterovic; Cliff Hudis; Antonio C Wolff; Jennifer De Los Santos; Alastair Thompson; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.