| Literature DB >> 27762640 |
Bfm Wijnen1,2, Gapg Van Mastrigt1, W K Redekop3, Hjm Majoie2,4,5,6, Rja De Kinderen1, Smaa Evers1,7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This article is part of the series "How to Prepare a Systematic Review (SR) of Economic Evaluations (EE) for Informing Evidence-based Healthcare Decisions" in which a five-step-approach for conducting a SR of EE is proposed. Areas covered: This paper explains the data extraction process, the risk of bias assessment and the transferability of EEs by means of a narrative review and expert opinion. SRs play a critical role in determining the comparative cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions. It is important to determine the risk of bias and the transferability of an EE. Expert commentary: Over the past decade, several criteria lists have been developed. This article aims to provide recommendations on these criteria lists based on the thoroughness of development, feasibility, overall quality, recommendations of leading organizations, and widespread use.Keywords: Systematic reviews; clinical practice guidelines; data-extraction; economic evaluations; quality appraisal; risk of bias
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27762640 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ISSN: 1473-7167 Impact factor: 2.217