Literature DB >> 27762420

Probing driving forces in aerolysin and α-hemolysin biological nanopores: electrophoresis versus electroosmosis.

Mordjane Boukhet1, Fabien Piguet1, Hadjer Ouldali1, Manuela Pastoriza-Gallego1, Juan Pelta1, Abdelghani Oukhaled1.   

Abstract

The transport of macromolecules through nanopores is involved in many biological functions and is today at the basis of promising technological applications. Nevertheless the interpretation of the dynamics of the macromolecule/nanopore interaction is still misunderstood and under debate. At the nanoscale, inside biomimetic channels under an external applied voltage, electrophoresis, which is the electric force acting on electrically charged molecules, and electroosmotic flow (EOF), which is the fluid transport associated with ions, contribute to the direction and magnitude of the molecular transport. In order to decipher the contribution of the electrophoresis and electroosmotic flow, we explored the interaction of small, rigid, neutral molecules (cyclodextrins) and flexible, non-ionic polymers (poly(ethylene glycol), PEG) that can coordinate cations under appropriate experimental conditions, with two biological nanopores: aerolysin (AeL) and α-hemolysin (aHL). We performed experiments using two electrolytes with different ionic hydration (KCl and LiCl). Regardless of the nature of the nanopore and of the electrolyte, cyclodextrins behaved as neutral analytes. The dominant driving force was attributed to EOF, acting in the direction of the anion flow and stronger in LiCl than in KCl. The same qualitative behaviour was observed for PEGs in LiCl. In contrast, in KCl, PEGs behaved as positively charged polyelectrolytes through both AeL and aHL. Our results are in agreement with theoretical predictions about the injection of polymers inside a confined geometry (ESI). We believe our results to be of significant importance for better control of the dynamics of analytes of different nature through biological nanopores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27762420     DOI: 10.1039/c6nr06936c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  20 in total

1.  From current trace to the understanding of confined media.

Authors:  Jean Roman; Bruno Le Pioufle; Loïc Auvray; Juan Pelta; Laurent Bacri
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 1.890

2.  Electro-Mechanical Conductance Modulation of a Nanopore Using a Removable Gate.

Authors:  Shidi Zhao; Laura Restrepo-Pérez; Misha Soskine; Giovanni Maglia; Chirlmin Joo; Cees Dekker; Aleksei Aksimentiev
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  If Squeezed, a Camel Passes Through the Eye of a Needle: Voltage-Mediated Stretching of Dendrimers Facilitates Passage Through a Nanopore.

Authors:  Alina Asandei; Irina Schiopu; Corina Ciobanasu; Yoonkyung Park; Tudor Luchian
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Porphyrin-Assisted Docking of a Thermophage Portal Protein into Lipid Bilayers: Nanopore Engineering and Characterization.

Authors:  Benjamin Cressiot; Sandra J Greive; Wei Si; Tomas C Pascoa; Mehrnaz Mojtabavi; Maria Chechik; Huw T Jenkins; Xueguang Lu; Ke Zhang; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Alfred A Antson; Meni Wanunu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Dynamics of a polyelectrolyte through aerolysin channel as a function of applied voltage and concentration.

Authors:  Manuela Pastoriza-Gallego; Bénédicte Thiébot; Laurent Bacri; Loïc Auvray; Juan Pelta
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 1.890

6.  Computational methods and theory for ion channel research.

Authors:  C Guardiani; F Cecconi; L Chiodo; G Cottone; P Malgaretti; L Maragliano; M L Barabash; G Camisasca; M Ceccarelli; B Corry; R Roth; A Giacomello; B Roux
Journal:  Adv Phys X       Date:  2022

7.  Geometrically Induced Selectivity and Unidirectional Electroosmosis in Uncharged Nanopores.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Muccio; Blasco Morozzo Della Rocca; Mauro Chinappi
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 18.027

8.  Comparative biosensing of glycosaminoglycan hyaluronic acid oligo- and polysaccharides using aerolysin and [Formula: see text]-hemolysin nanopores.

Authors:  Aziz Fennouri; Joana Ramiandrisoa; Laurent Bacri; Jérôme Mathé; Régis Daniel
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.890

9.  High Temperature Extends the Range of Size Discrimination of Nonionic Polymers by a Biological Nanopore.

Authors:  Fabien Piguet; Hadjer Ouldali; Françoise Discala; Marie-France Breton; Jan C Behrends; Juan Pelta; Abdelghani Oukhaled
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Manipulation of the Internal Hydrophobicity of FraC Nanopores Augments Peptide Capture and Recognition.

Authors:  Florian Leonardus Rudolfus Lucas; Kumar Sarthak; Erica Mariska Lenting; David Coltan; Nieck Jordy van der Heide; Roderick Corstiaan Abraham Versloot; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Giovanni Maglia
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.