| Literature DB >> 27761428 |
Santram Lodhi1, Avijeet Jain2, Alok Pal Jain3, Rajesh Singh Pawar4, Abhay Kumar Singhai1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Martynia annua L. (M. annua), (Martyniaccae) has been traditionally used in the treatment of epilepsy, sore throat and inflammatory disorders. The leaf paste is used topically on Tuberculosis of the lymphatic glands and wounds of domestic animals. Tephrosia purpurea (T. purpurea), (Fabaceae) has been used traditionally as a remedy for asthma, gonorrhea, rheumatism and ulcers. This study aimed to evaluate the potential wound healing effects of different fractions ofethanol extract of M. annua leaves and aerial parts of T. purpurea.Entities:
Keywords: Burn wound; Dead-space wound; Luteolin; Martynia annua; Povidone Iodine ointment; Tephrosia purpurea
Year: 2016 PMID: 27761428 PMCID: PMC5052421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Figure 1HPTLC fingerprint of different fractions of M. annua and T. purpurea; 1: TPF-A; 2: Quercetin; 3: MAF-C; 4: Luteolin
HPTLC fingerprint of different fractions of M. annua and T. purpurea
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | 0.05 | 1254.0 |
| 2 | 0.12 | 9246.3 | |
| 3 | 0.38 | 21572.4 | |
| 4 | 0.58 | 428.1 | |
| 5 | 0.63 | 2543.5 | |
| 6 | 0.74 | 2317.8 | |
| 7 | 0.95 | 985.4 | |
|
| 1 | 0.38 | 12415.5 |
|
| 1 | 0.05 | 642.7 |
| 2 | 0.21 | 533.2 | |
| 3 | 0.26 | 2451.4 | |
| 4 | 0.31 | 2538.7 | |
| 5 | 0.36 | 2749.8 | |
| 6 | 0.49 | 10247.2 | |
| 7 | 0.69 | 13876.8 | |
|
| 1 | 0.69 | 14638.4 |
TPF-A: ethyl acetate fraction of T. purpurea; MAF-C: methanol soluble fraction of M. annua.
Effects of ointment formulations of M. annua and T. purpurea on various biochemical parameters of tissues with dead-space wound in rats
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 17.57 ± 0.64 | 32.63 ± 1.15 | 30.64 ± 1.02 |
|
| 36.82 ± 1.21 | 58.54 ± 2.45 | 52.52 ± 2.14 |
|
| 41.62 ± 2.03 | 56.24 ± 1.81 | 56.26 ± 1.52 |
|
| 19.69 ± 0.43 | 31.18 ± 1.54 | 31.77 ± 1.18 |
|
| 29.28 ± 1.81 | 41.64 ± 1.62 | 47.28 ± 1.63 |
|
| 20.17 ± 0.97 | 34.89 ± 1.27 | 33.16 ± 1.20 |
|
| 28.61 ± 1.25 | 44.72 ± 1.60 | 45.30 ± 1.84 |
|
| 43.26 ± 1.79 | 62.89 ± 2.10 | 57.85 ± 1.64 |
Values represent Mean ± S.D (n = 6).
p<0.01, when each treated group was compared with control and reference group. TPF-A: ethyl acetate fraction of T. purpurea; MAF-C: methanol soluble fraction of M. annua; PONG: Pongamol; LUT: Luteolin
Effects of ointment formulations from M. annua and T. purpurea on antioxidants level of tissues with dead-space wound in rats
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 11.23 ± 0.42 | 10.71 ± 0.55 | 12.38 ± 0.38 |
|
| 26.11 ± 1.25 | 34.91 ± 1.13 | 26.17 ± 1.14 |
|
| 28.52 ± 1.01 | 41.22 ± 1.46 | 25.48 ± 1.21 |
|
| 12.07 ± 0.57 | 13.28 ± 0.64 | 10.25 ± 0.28 |
|
| 20.24 ± 1.02 | 25.19 ± 1.20 | 22.46 ± 1.12 |
|
| 14.10 ± 0.28 | 9.08 ± 0.48 | 14.09 ± 0.58 |
|
| 21.37 ± 1.10 | 27.39 ± 1.34 | 23.12 ± 1.14 |
|
| 30.21 ± 1.48 | 39.88 ± 1.79 | 28.61 ± 1.21 |
Values represents Mean ± S.D. (n = 6).
p<0.01, when each treated group was compared with control and reference group
Effects of ointment formulations from M. annua and T. purpurea on hydroxyproline and protein content of tissues with burn wound in rats
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| 72.29 ± 2.35 | 88.91 ± 2.59 |
|
| 41.27 ± 1.57 | 50.62 ± 1.58 |
|
| 63.54 ± 2.40 | 72.40 ± 2.14 |
|
| 71.65 ± 2.69 | 85.57 ± 3.64 |
|
| 45.41 ± 1.27 | 55.43 ± 1.86 |
|
| 50.95 ± 1.20 | 61.71 ± 2.25 |
|
| 46.28 ± 1.34 | 52.38 ± 1.68 |
|
| 52.10 ± 1.92 | 66.24 ± 1.52 |
Values represents Mean ± S.D. (n = 6).
p<0.01, when each treated group was compared with control and reference group.
Effects of ointment formulations from M. annua and T. purpurea on enzymatic and non-enzymatic level of tissues with burn wound in rats.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 20.52 ± 1.05 | 25.24 ± 1.27 | 23.31 ± 0.85 |
|
| 37.64 ± 1.32 | 48.23 ± 1.86 | 41.76 ± 1.34 |
|
| 39.12 ± 1.78 | 46.17 ± 1.87 | 45.69 ± 1.25 |
|
| 24.09 ± 0.94 | 26.34 ± 1.08 | 26.38 ± 0.76 |
|
| 30.27 ± 1.21 | 38.92 ± 1.27 | 35.17 ± 1.28 |
|
| 23.61 ± 1.23 | 28.42 ± 0.94 | 28.20 ± 1.64 |
|
| 28.28 ± 1.34 | 36.16 ± 1.54 | 37.64 ± 1.39 |
|
| 38.28 ± 1.55 | 50.38 ± 1.65 | 46.88 ± 1.75 |
Values represents Mean ± S.D. (n = 6).
p<0.01, when each treated group was compared with control and reference group.
Figure 2Photomicrograph of skin tissues after treatment with different fractions of M. annua and T. purpurea in dead-space wound. (A) Control; (B) TPF-A Ointment (5% w/w); (C) MAF-C Ointment (5% w/w); (D) PONG Ointment (0.2% w/w); (E) PONG Ointment (0.5% w/w); (F) LUT Ointment (0.2% w/w); (G) LUT Ointment (0.5% w/w); (H) Povidone Iodine ointment (5% w/w
Figure 3Photomicrograph of skin tissues after treatment with different fractions of M. annua and T. purpurea in burn wound. (A) Control; (B) TPF-A Ointment (5% w/w); (C) MAF-C Ointment (5% w/w); (D) PONG Ointment (0.2% w/w); (E) PONG Ointment (0.5% w/w); (F) LUT Ointment (0.2% w/w); (G) LUT Ointment (0.5% w/w); (H) Silver Sulphadiazine Ointment