| Literature DB >> 27761421 |
Suganya Venkateshan1, Vetriselvan Subramaniyan2, Velmurugan Chinnasamy3, Sarath Chandiran4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Dietary changes play major risk roles in oxidative stress and cardiovascular disease and modulate normal metabolic function. The present study was designed to investigate the ameliorative potential of different extracts of Hemidesmus indicus to experimental high-fat diet in wistar rats, and their possible mechanism of action.Entities:
Keywords: Antihyperlipidemia; Hemidesmus indicus; High fat diet; Liver protection; Oxidative stress; Plasma lipid profile
Year: 2016 PMID: 27761421 PMCID: PMC5052414
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Preliminary phytochemical study of different extracts of Hemidesmus indicus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Alkaloids | Negative | Positive | Positive |
|
| Carbohydrates and glycosides | Negative | Negative | Positive |
|
| Phenolic compounds and tannins | Negative | Negative | Positive |
|
| Flavonoids | Negative | Negative | Positive |
Effect of different extracts of Hemidesmus indicus on CAT (μ moles of H2O2 consumed min/mg/protein) activity of the aorta, heart and liver in rats
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 33.25±0.66 | 46.63±0.56 | 29.93±0.82 |
|
| 21.50±0.40 | 29.22±0.55 | 15.29±0.54 |
|
| 24.25±0.34 | 33.21±0.60 | 18.43±0.55 |
|
| 25.10±0.54 | 36.85±0.50 | 20.08±0.47 |
|
| 30.64±0.60ns | 44.94±0.67ns | 28.70±0.81ns |
|
| 34.06±2.89ns | 46.47±0.84ns | 29.03±0.81ns |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Data were analyzed using One-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
p< 0.001;
p< 0.05 considered significant; ns: non-significant; All groups are compared with normal control. CAT: catalase.
Effect of different extracts of Hemidesmus indicus on SOD (unit min/mg/protein) activity of the aorta, heart and liver in rats
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.50±0.05 | 1.84±0.05 | 3.50±0.07 |
|
| 1.36±0.03 | 0.60±0.04 | 1.50±0.05 |
|
| 1.62±0.01 | 0.68±0.05 | 1.86±0.06 |
|
| 1.72±0.02 | 0.77±0.05 | 1.98±0.06 |
|
| 2.36±0.04ns | 1.68±0.05ns | 3.29±0.06ns |
|
| 2.43±0.04ns | 1.72±0.05ns | 3.35±0.06ns |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Data were analyzed using One-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
p<0.001;
p< 0.05 considered significant; ns: non-significant; All groups are compared with normal control. SOD: superoxide dismutase.
Effect of different extracts of Hemidesmus indicus on GPX (mg of GSH consumed/min/mg protein) activity of aorta, heart and liver in rats
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 11.54±0.56 | 15.90±0.64 | 9.13±0.433 |
|
| 6.88±0.30 | 7.38±0.45 | 5.74±0.38 |
|
| 8.00±0.25 | 9.09±0.52 | 6.39±0.39 |
|
| 8.69±0.40 | 10.06±0.78 | 7.07±0.28 |
|
| 10.29±0.58ns | 14.23±0.74ns | 8.30±0.34ns |
|
| 11.1±0.60ns | 15.22±0.65ns | 8.75±0.40ns |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Data were analyzed using One-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
p<0.001,
p<0.01;
p<0.05 considered significant; ns: non-significant; All groups are compared with normal control.GPX: glutathione peroxidase.
Effect of different extracts of Hemidesmus indicus on plasma lipid profile in control and experimental rats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 194.76±2.48 | 113.83±1.48 | 27.05±0.28 | 84.99±1.71 |
|
| 251.25±3.05 | 177.8±1.64 | 46.50±0.75 | 130.08±0.33 |
|
| 241.02±2.86 | 127.90±1.45 | 42.61±0.91 | 119.63±1.25 |
|
| 238.80±2.71 | 127.46±1.49 | 42±0.89 | 118.81±1.38 |
|
| 204.51±2.47ns | 119.63±1.69 | 28.95±0.35ns | 87.00±1.78ns |
|
| 200.53±2.50ns | 116.51±1.26ns | 28.09±0.21ns | 85.73±1.80ns |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Data were analyzed using One-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
p<0.001,
p<0.05 considered significant; ns: non-significant; All groups are compared with normal control. BW: body weight; TC: total cholesterol; FC: free cholesterol; EC: ester cholesterol.
Effect of different extracts of Hemidesmus indicus on plasma lipid profile in control and experimental rats
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 106.53±0.41 | 78.54± 0.93 | 1.85±0.03 |
|
| 155.19±1.17 | 155.91±1.34 | 4.67±0.12 |
|
| 148.48±0.98 | 134.55±2.28 | 2.35±0.03 |
|
| 147.74±1.14 | 116.41±1.98 | 2.28±0.03 |
|
| 110.09±0.50 | 84.19±1.24ns | 1.95±0.03ns |
|
| 108.82±0.35ns | 81.59±1.19ns | 1.90±0.03ns |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Data were analyzed using One-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
p<0.001,
p<0.05 considered significant; ns: non- significant. All groups are compared with normal control. PLs: phospholipids; TGs: triglycerides; AI: atherogenic index.
Effect of different extracts of Hemidesmus indicus on plasma lipoprotein in control and experimental rats
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 58.87±0.63 | 39.29±0.61 | 17.50±0.48 |
|
| 24.98±1.23 | 104.91±1.95 | 35.67±1.31 |
|
| 29.43±1.27 | 94.50±2.34 | 32.66±1.04 |
|
| 35.76±1.18 | 84.01±2.37 | 32.41±1.18 |
|
| 53.84±0.92 | 46.26±1.04 | 19.94±0.43ns |
|
| 55.77±1.18ns | 41.99±1.13ns | 19.14±0.44ns |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Data were analyzed using One-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
p<0.001,
p<0.05 considered as significant; ns: non significant; All groups are compared with normal control.HDL: high density lipoprotein; LDL: low density lipoprotein; VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein.
Figure 1Effect of various treatments on histology of liver tissue