| Literature DB >> 27761331 |
Samseh Abdullah Noradilah1, Ii Li Lee2, Tengku Shahrul Anuar3, Fatmah Md Salleh4, Siti Nor Azreen Abdul Manap4, Noor Shazleen Husnie Mohd Mohtar4, Syed Muhamad Azrul5, Wan Omar Abdullah6, Norhayati Moktar4.
Abstract
In the tropics, there are too few studies on isolation of Blastocystis sp. subtypes from water sources; in addition, there is also an absence of reported studies on the occurrence of Blastocystis sp. subtypes in water during different seasons. Therefore, this study was aimed to determine the occurrence of Blastocystis sp. subtypes in river water and other water sources that drained aboriginal vicinity of highly endemic intestinal parasitic infections during wet and dry seasons. Water samples were collected from six sampling points of Sungai Krau (K1-K6) and a point at Sungai Lompat (K7) and other water sources around the aboriginal villages. The water samples were collected during both seasons, wet and dry seasons. Filtration of the water samples were carried out using a flatbed membrane filtration system. The extracted DNA from concentrated water sediment was subjected to single round polymerase chain reaction and positive PCR products were subjected to sequencing. All samples were also subjected to filtration and cultured on membrane lactose glucuronide agar for the detection of faecal coliforms. During wet season, Blastocystis sp. ST1, ST2 and ST3 were detected in river water samples. Blastocystis sp. ST3 occurrence was sustained in the river water samples during dry season. However Blastocystis sp. ST1 and ST2 were absent during dry season. Water samples collected from various water sources showed contaminations of Blastocystis sp. ST1, ST2, ST3 and ST4, during wet season and Blastocystis sp. ST1, ST3, ST8 and ST10 during dry season. Water collected from all river sampling points during both seasons showed growth of Escherichia coli and Enterobacter aerogenes, indicating faecal contamination. In this study, Blastocystis sp. ST3 is suggested as the most robust and resistant subtype able to survive in any adverse environmental condition. Restriction and control of human and animal faecal contaminations to the river and other water sources shall prevent the transmission of Blastocystis sp. to humans and animals in this aboriginal community.Entities:
Keywords: Aboriginal settlements; Blastocystis sp.; Water; Wet and dry seasons
Year: 2016 PMID: 27761331 PMCID: PMC5068341 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2541
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Map showing each six river sampling point at Sungai Krau and a point at Sungai Lompat.
Figure 2Physical parameters (pH, conductivity, temperature and turbidity) at all river sampling points.
Figure 3Chemical parameters (concentration of Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Sulfate & Chlorine) at all river sampling points.
Figure 4Faecal coliforms count at all river sampling points.
Blastocystis sp. subtypes isolated from river water samples during wet and dry seasons.
| Point of sampling | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST1 | ST2 | ST3 | ||||
| Wet | Dry | Wet | Dry | Wet | Dry | |
| Sungai Krau K1 | − | − | + | − | + | + |
| Sungai Krau K2 | + | − | − | − | + | + |
| Sungai Krau K3 | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| Sungai Krau K4 | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| Sungai Krau K5 | − | − | + | − | + | + |
| Sungai Krau K6 | + | − | − | − | + | + |
| Sungai Lompat | + | − | − | − | + | + |
| Total | 3/7 (42.9%) | 0/7 (0.0%) | 2/7 (28.6%) | 0/7 (0.0%) | 7/7 (100.0%) | 7/7 (100.0%) |
Notes.
Positive for Blastocystis sp
Negative for Blastocystis sp
Blastocystis sp. subtypes in water from other sampling sources during wet and dry seasons.
| Positive for | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number of samples | ST1 | ST2 | ST3 | Other ST | ||||||
| Point of sampling | Wet | Dry | Wet | Dry | Wet | Dry | Wet | Dry | Wet | Dry |
| Tap water | 13 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | |||||
| Water in tank (Life Saver) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Well | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |||||
| Stored water | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 (ST8) | |||||
| Small stream | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Fish pond | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 (ST10) | |||||
| 21 | 1(4.8%) | 0(0.0%) | 2(9.5%) | |||||||
Notes.
Not applicable
(A) Subtyping of Blastocystis sp. for water samples collected during the wet season. (B) Subtyping of Blastocystis sp. for water samples collected during the dry season.
| Samples code | Source of samples | Subtype | Identity (%) | Accession number | 18S rRNA allele |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A) | |||||
| K1 B4 KT | River | 2 | 99 |
| 15 |
| K2 in KT | River | 1 | 99 |
| 4 |
| K2 in KT | River | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| K3 B4 LW | River | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| K4 in LW | River | 3 | 99 |
| 38 |
| K5 B4 KP | River | 2 | 99 |
| 15 |
| K5 B4 KP | River | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| K6 in KP | River | 1 | 99 |
| 4 |
| K6 in KP | River | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| SL | River | 1 | 99 |
| 4 |
| 22 KP | Tap water | 3 | 99 |
| 38 |
| Stored water ASPLW | Stored water | 3 | 99 |
| 38 |
| Well Abu3 | Well | 3 | 99 |
| 38 |
| Fish pond3 | Fish pond | 3 | 99 |
| 38 |
| Stored water Selamat3KP | Stored water | 3 | 99 |
| 31 |
| Untreated tap water hill KT | Tap water | 3 | 99 |
| 31 |
| Well KP | Well water | 1 | 99 |
| 4 |
| Well Abu2 | Well water | 2 | 99 |
| 15 |
| Stored water Selamat4 | Stored water | 4 | 99 |
| 94 |
| (B) | |||||
| K1 B4 KTA | River | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| K2 in KTA | River | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| K3 B4 LWA | River | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| K4 in LWA | River | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| K5 B4 KPA | River | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| K6 in KPA | River | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| SLa | River | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| Well water KPA | Well water | 3 | 99 |
| 36 |
| Stored water Selamat3 | Stored water | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| TBLWA | Tap water | 3 | 99 |
| 33 |
| Tap water LWA | Tap water | 3 | 99 |
| 33 |
| Well water KTA | Well water | 3 | 99 |
| 34 |
| Fish pond LWA10 | Fish pond | 10 | 99 |
| 43 |
| Fish pond LWA1 | Fish pond | 1 | 99 |
| 4 |
| Stored water Selamat8 | Stored water | 8 | 99 |
| 21 |
Correlations between different Blastocystis sp. subtypes with physicochemical parameters, faecal coliforms and monthly total rainfall at Sungai Krau and Sungai Lompat (at 0.05 level, 2-tailed).
| Correlations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST1 | ST2 | ST3 | ||||
| Parameter | Wet | Dry | Wet | Dry | Wet | Dry |
| pH | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Conductivity | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Temperature | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Turbidity | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Dissolved oxygen (DO) | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Chemical oxygen demand (COD) | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Total dissolved solid (TDS) | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Total chlorine | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Sulfate | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Faecal coliform | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Monthly total rainfall | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
Notes.
Correlation coefficients
Probability level
significant correlation at 0.05 level.