Literature DB >> 27761312

Geographical and altitudinal distribution of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) endemic to the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest.

Marcos R Bornschein1, Carina R Firkowski2, Ricardo Belmonte-Lopes3, Leandro Corrêa4, Luiz F Ribeiro5, Sérgio A A Morato6, Reuber L Antoniazzi7, Bianca L Reinert8, Andreas L S Meyer9, Felipe A Cini2, Marcio R Pie3.   

Abstract

Mountains of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest can act as islands of cold and wet climate, leading to the isolation and speciation of species with low dispersal capacity, such as the toadlet species of the genus Brachycephalus. This genus is composed primarily by diurnal species, with miniaturized body sizes (<2.5 cm), inhabiting microhabitats in the leaf litter of montane forests. Still, little is known about the geographical distribution, altitudinal range, and ecological limits of most Brachycephalus species. In this study, we review the available data on the geographical and altitudinal distribution of Brachycephalus based on occurrence records compiled from literature and museums, both for the genus as a whole and separately for the three recently proposed groups of species (ephippium, didactylus, and pernix). The final ensemble dataset comprised 333 records, 120 localities, 28 described species, and six undescribed ones. Species were recorded in six relief units, the richest of which being the Serra do Mar, with 30 species. When the Serra do Mar is subdivided into three subunits, Northern, Central and Southern Serra do Mar, the number of species increase from north to the south, with records of six, nine, and 16 species, respectively. We were able to estimate the extent of occurrence of nearly half of the described species, and the resulting estimates indicate that many of them show remarkably small ranges, some of which less than 50 ha. Brachycephalus species are present from sea level to roughly 1,900 m a.s.l., with the highest richness being found between 751 and 1,000 m a.s.l. (21 spp.). The species with the broadest altitudinal range were B. didactylus (1,075 m) and Brachycephalus sp. 1 (1,035 m), both in the didactylus group, and B. ephippium (1,050 m), of the ephippium group. The broadest altitudinal amplitude for species of the pernix group was recorded for B. brunneus (535 m). The lowest altitudinal records for the pernix group were at 845 m a.s.l. in the state of Paraná and at 455 m a.s.l. in the state of Santa Catarina. The altitudinal occurrence in the pernixspecies group seems to decrease southward. Syntopy between species is also reviewed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cloud forest; Extent of occurrence; Highlands; Relief units; Species group; Syntopy

Year:  2016        PMID: 27761312      PMCID: PMC5068354          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


Introduction

Brachycephalus Fitzinger is a genus of miniaturized diurnal toadlets (usually <2.5 cm in snout-vent length) that inhabit the forest floor of montane regions along the Atlantic Rainforest of southeastern and southern Brazil (Izecksohn, 1971; Giaretta & Sawaya, 1998; Pombal Jr, Wistuba & Bornschein, 1998; Napoli et al., 2011; Pie et al., 2013; see Rocha et al. (2000) and Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011) for reports of nocturnal activity). Brachycephalus presents direct development and a reduction in the number and size of digits (Hanken & Wake, 1993; Pombal Jr, 1999; Yeh, 2002). Some species are aposematic (yellow, orange or yellow with light red), of which some were confirmed as harboring neurotoxins (tetrodotoxin and analogues; Sebben et al., 1986; Pires Jr et al., 2002; Pires Jr et al., 2003; Schwartz et al., 2007). Recently, Kaplan (2002) proposed that the genus Psyllophryne Izecksohn should be considered as a junior synonym of Brachycephalus. Psyllophryne included two species, P. didactyla and P. hermogenesi, “with dorsal surfaces brown, tiny body sizes (snout-vent length 8.6–10.2 mm), body leptodactyliform, and long-distance jumpers” (Napoli et al., 2011). There are currently 29 described species of Brachycephalus (Frost, 2015; see Pie & Ribeiro, 2015; Ribeiro et al., 2015), and although 20 of them were described within the last 10 years, it is likely that many more species are still waiting to be described. Moreover, ecological data on species of the genus Brachycephalus is still limited. To date it only includes data on the breeding behavior of B. ephippium (Pombal Jr, Sazima & Haddad, 1994; Pombal Jr, 1999); vocal activity of B. hermogenesi (Verdade et al., 2008); advertisement calls of B. ephippium (Pombal Jr, Sazima & Haddad, 1994), B. hermogenesi (Verdade et al., 2008), B. pitanga (Araújo et al., 2012), B. tridactylus (Garey et al., 2012), and B. crispus (Condez et al., 2014); abundance estimates of B. didactylus (Van Sluys et al., 2007; Almeida-Santos et al., 2011; Rocha et al., 2013; Siqueira et al., 2014) and its diet (Almeida-Santos et al., 2011); the diet of B. brunneus (Fontoura, Ribeiro & Pie, 2011), B. garbeanus (Dorigo et al., 2012), and B. pitanga (Oliveira & Haddad, 2015); and microhabitat preference of B. garbeanus (Dorigo et al., 2012). A recently-proposed phylogenetic hypothesis for the genus indicated their separation into three main clades, with still some uncertainty regarding relationships within each clade (Clemente-Carvalho et al., 2011b). Based on the species studied by Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), one clade included B. didactylus and B. hermogenesi; a second clade, included B. brunneus, B. ferruginus, B. izecksohni, B. pernix, and B. pombali; and a third clade included B. alipioi, B. ephippium, B. garbeanus, B. nodoterga, B. pitanga, B. toby, and B. vertebralis. Two morphological traits—the presence/absence of dermal co-ossification and body shape—were used to distinguish three groups of species (Ribeiro et al., 2015), namely ephippium, didactylus, and pernix groups. The first was defined by the presence of dermal co-ossification and bufoniform body shape and includes the following species, distributed in southeastern Brazil (from the state of Espírito Santo south to the state of São Paulo): B. alipioi, B. bufonoides, B. crispus, B. ephippium, B. garbeanus, B. guarani, B. margaritatus, B. nodoterga, B. pitanga, B. toby, and B. vertebralis (Ribeiro et al., 2015). The didactylus group was defined by the absence of dermal co-ossification and a leptodactyliform body shape and includes B. didactylus, B. hermogenesi, and B. pulex (Ribeiro et al., 2015). Finally, the pernix group was defined by the absence of dermal co-ossification and bufoniform body shape, and includes the following species, distributed in southern Brazil (states of Paraná and Santa Catarina): B. auroguttatus, B. boticario, B. brunneus, B. ferruginus, B. fuscolineatus, B. izecksohni, B. leopardus, B. mariaeterezae, B. olivaceus, B. pernix, B. pombali, B. tridactylus, and B. verrucosus (Ribeiro et al., 2015). Later, an additional species from the pernix group was described from southern Brazil (Pie & Ribeiro, 2015): B. quiririensis. On the other hand, the holotype of Brachycephalus atelopoides is currently missing (Pombal Jr, 2010) and no population of this species in nature is known. Therefore, given that diagnostic characters could not be inspected, B. atelopoides was not assigned to any of the species groups (Ribeiro et al., 2015). A recent study by Padial, Grant & Frost (2014) indicated that B. hermogenesi would be closely related to a species of the ephippium group, implying that the didactylus and ephippium clades were not monophyletic, but the authors used the same dataset as the original Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b) study. One possibility for this incongruence is that Padial, Grant & Frost (2014) only analyzed the concatenated dataset, which could have masked variations among different among loci that were accounted for in species tree analyses by Clemente-Carvalho et al. (Ribeiro et al., 2015). An intriguing aspect of Brachycephalus is the high level of microendemism found in most of its species. For instance, extensive field surveys often find species confined to one or a few adjacent mountaintops along the Atlantic Forest (Pie et al., 2013), suggesting that their diversification is strongly linked to the topographical characteristics of their habitats. Therefore, to understand the origin and distribution of Brachycephalus, it is crucial to integrate species occurrence data with the geographical attributes of the biomes where they are found. The Atlantic Forest, the second largest forested biome of South America, can be divided at least into eight broad relief units, of which three correspond to higher altitude regions, namely plateaus (“Planaltos”), mountain ranges (“Serras”), and escarpments (“Escarpas”) (IBGE, 1993). The highest mountains of the Atlantic Forest biome occur in the Serra da Mantiqueira and Serra do Mar. Their formation is associated with tectonic events dating back to the Paleocene, which caused an uplift of an eastern sector of southeastern Brazil and led to a depression in the eastern border. This region was subsequently submerged by the ocean and led to the formation of the Santos basin (Almeida & Carneiro, 1998). A second downgrade occurred further inland, establishing the Serra da Mantiqueira (it extends throughout the states of Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo; Almeida & Carneiro, 1998), which is currently divided by the “Paraíba do Sul” river valley into northern and southern rims (IBGE, 1993; IBGE, 2006; MMA, 2016). The Serra do Mar, formed between 300 and 400 million years before present, contitutes the new eastern border of the Brazilian plateau that was progressively eroded westward, leaving remnants that formed coastal islands (Almeida & Carneiro, 1998). This edge of the plateau, called Serra do Mar, was interrupted from the southern state of São Paulo by headward erosion of the Ribeira river valley and from its lower limit in northeastern state of Santa Catarina by headward erosion of the Itajaí Açu river valley (Almeida & Carneiro, 1998). Millions of years of erosion processes have shaped the escarpments and mountains in eastern and southern Brazil. Instead of forming a continuous massif range, several blocks of high elevation isolated by lower areas have been formed, constituting a mountain range. These blocks receive one or more regional names of “Serras,” the highest of which being Serra do Caparaó (2,892 m a.s.l.) and Serra do Itatiaia (2,791 m a.s.l.), both part of Serra da Mantiqueira. The Serra do Mar in its northern limit (northern state of Rio de Janeiro) is characterized by several “Serras” with the highest peak reaching up to 2,230 m a.s.l. Its middle section presents a distinctive structure, featuring a high plateau at the border between the states of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, which decreases in altitude southward until southeast of São Paulo city. In this region around the São Paulo city, the Serra do Mar is characterized as a border of the plateau (Almeida & Carneiro, 1998), reaching 800–900 m a.s.l., whereas in the border between the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro its altitude reaches up to 2,050 m a.s.l. In the state of Paraná, the Serra do Mar is characterized again by several “Serras” with altitudes from 500 to 1,000 m above the plateau (Maack, 1981); the highest peak reaches up to 1,800 m a.s.l. (sensu Google Earth (satellite image from 2015), or 1,922 m a.s.l., sensu Maack (1981)). The Serra do Mar in the state of Santa Catarina has a very short extension (about 45 km in a north/south straight line). The highest altitudes are found only near the border with the state of Paraná, where it reaches up to 1,524 m. Further south, the Serra do Mar becomes increasingly lower, reaching only ∼600 m a.s.l. on the southern edge of occurrence of this relief unit. The mountainous regions of the Atlantic Forest might have contributed to the formation and distribution limits of Brachycephalus in several ways. For instance, mountains could have supported population remnants of many species during warmer periods throughout the Quaternary (e.g., Carnaval et al., 2009; Brunes et al., 2010; Thomé et al., 2010; Amaro et al., 2012; see also Wollenberg et al., 2011; Páez-Moscoso & Guayasamin, 2012, and Giarla, Voss & Jansa, 2014 for similar scenarios in other montane regions) mainly due to their distinctly colder and wetter climatic conditions. Hence, they played an important role in the diversification of animals with low dispersion capacities, including certain birds (Mata et al., 2009) and amphibians (Cruz & Feio, 2007; Brunes et al., 2010; Thomé et al., 2010). This has been confirmed in an investigation of the environmental niches of different Brachycephalus species groups, given that they were shown to occupy distinct regions of climatic space (Pie et al., 2013). That analysis included most of the described species (as well some that were undescribed) and was based occurrence records associated with species descriptions, museum specimens, and a few comprehensive references. They have also presented new geographical distribution limits for the genus and records of altitude for all species. However, no study to date has explored explicitly the altitudinal variation and provided estimates of geographical distributions of Brachycephalus species. Understanding the ecological limits, geographical distributions, and altitudinal ranges of Brachycephalus species is of considerable importance, particularly to direct more effective conservation actions. In the present study, we address the aforementioned aspects by reviewing the geographical and altitudinal distribution of Brachycephalus based on records compiled from literature and museum specimens. In particular, expanding a previous effort by Pie et al. (2013), we now include the entire literature on Brachycephalus, which nearly tripled the number of sources in relation to that study. We analyze the geographical distribution and altitudinal amplitude of occurrence of the genus as a whole, as well as separately based on their species groups.

Materials and Methods

Species records

In an earlier paper (Pie et al., 2013), occurrence records of Brachycephalus species were obtained from the SpeciesLink portal (www.splink.org.br), as well as from DZUP (Coleção de Herpetologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, state of Paraná, Brazil) and MHNCI (Museu de História Natural Capão da Imbuia - Prefeitura Municipal de Curitiba) collections, and from the species descriptions themselves. For this paper we expanded that dataset by compiling additional records from DZUP and from a broader review of the literature. A few unpublished records obtained by the authors in southern Brazil were also included to improve the dataset. Collection, handling and preservation permits were issued by ICMBIO (22470–1 and 22470–2). We carried out the same careful analysis as in Pie et al. (2013) to check the precise geographical coordinates of point records using topographic maps (at different scales), resources of the Google Earth software, including the titles of photographs associated with different locations, and descriptive information of localities in other publications. The final dataset used for the analyses included only those records which coordinate precision index value was between 1.1 and 3.0, according to McLaren et al., reprinted in Knyazhnitskiy et al. (2000). To help further revisions, we also listed occurrence records considered imprecise after our revision (see ‘Results’). Although there are methods for georeferencing imprecise locations (e.g., Wieczorek, Guo & Hijmans, 2004), we preferred to discard the records that did not meet these standards. Altitudinal records were either compiled from the literature or, when that information was unavailable, by plotting occurrence records on Google Earth. The altitudinal range of some species were obtained directly from the literature or from the field by the authors. The altitudinal range represents the lower and higher altitudinal occurrence record of a species in a given locality. Although some records had precise locations, they were located on slopes where the exact altitude of the record was difficult to ascertain and therefore were omitted from further analysis, but not from the compiled table, to assist future revisions. All records were associated with Brazilian relief units (MMA, 2016) by simply plotting each record against a map of the limits of different relief units. In two of the major relief units, we also analyzed our data separately for their subunits as follows: the Serra da Mantiqueira as “Northern Serra da Mantiqueira” (states of Espírito Santo and adjacent Minas Gerais) and “Southern Serra da Mantiqueira” (states of Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo), and the Serra do Mar as “Northern Serra do Mar” (state of Rio de Janeiro), “Central Serra do Mar” (southern state of Rio de Janeiro and state of São Paulo), and “Southern Serra do Mar” (southern state of São Paulo and states of Paraná and Santa Catarina). The Serra da Mantiqueira we subdivided into two sectors because this unit comprises naturally two sectors, isolated by the “Paraíba do Sul” relief unit (IBGE, 1993; IBGE, 2006; MMA, 2016). The Serra do Mar we subdivided into sectors according to the interruption of escarpments (IBGE, 2006). Geographical coordinates are based into the WGS84 datum.

Geographical distribution measurement

We tentatively provide estimates of species geographical distributions as their “extent of occurrence,” sensu IUCN (2012), using two methods. The first is an adaptation of “minimum convex polygon” (Mohr, 1947), as Reinert, Bornschein & Firkowski (2007), which allowed for changing the shape of the minimum convex polygon, whenever it was possible, to remove areas that are obviously unsuitable for the persistence of the species, such as cities, plantations, bodies of water, and vegetation in the early stages of regeneration, as well areas beyond the altitudinal amplitude record of the species. In the second method, we made polygons by considering the lowest altimetric quota with records of the species, while also omitting unsuitable areas (as above). We made these environmental and altitudinal assessments and produced the resulting polygons using Google Earth Pro 7.1.4.1529. We then measured the areas encompassed by each polygon using GEPath 1.4.5. Although we disregarded unsuitable areas when drawing the polygons, we treated the resulting measurements as “extent of occurrence” and not “area of occupancy” (sensu IUCN, 2012) because microhabitat requirements can prevent the species from occurring in some parts of the area within the polygons. Unfortunately, we were unable to determine occurrence polygons of many species when the abovementioned criteria led to obviously unrealistic distribution polygons, primarily for the following reasons: (1) when there were exceedingly few records that were usually very scattered and/or encompassed vast degraded areas, or (2) when the altitudinal range of occurrence of a species based on their altitudinal limits encompassed unreasonably large areas (usually heading west). Notes. Species and records are ordered by the following criteria: alphabetic order of groups and alphabetic order of species by groups. According to IBAMA (2007) with additional subdivisions (see ‘Materials and Methods’). For group definitions, see ‘Materials and Methods’. Geographical coordinates are based on the datum WGS84. DZUP, Coleção de Herpetologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, state of Paraná, Brazil; MHNCI, Museu de História Natural Capão da Imbuia, Prefeitura Municipal de Curitiba, state of Paraná, Brazil. Excluded records represent vague localities, general reference of municipality of locality, and localities that were specified but could not be located or were questionable given exceedingly low associated altitude.

Species groups

All described species in the present compilation were assigned to one of the three species groups by Ribeiro et al. (2015), except for B. atelopoides (see above). The present compilation also includes some undescribed species not yet assigned to one of the three groups; all of them were mentioned as new species or potentially new species in the respective source of their records. Two of them were here assigned to the ephippium group because they probably represent populations of B. ephippium that could be split into two species, one of which from the state of Rio de Janeiro (Siqueira, Vrcibradic & Rocha, 2013; see also Siqueira et al., 2011) and the other from the state of São Paulo (Pie et al., 2013). A third undescribed species was assigned to the didactylus group because it represents a population to be split from B. hermogenesi (Pie et al., 2013), a representative species from the didactylus group. Finally, the other three populations were assigned to the pernix group because they were previously assigned to the “pernix clade” (Pie et al., 2013), whose members all belong to the pernix group (Ribeiro et al., 2015).

Results

The final dataset is composed of 333 records (from 73 distinc sources) of 120 localities (three of which representing novel unpublished records). These records involve the geographic occurrence of 28 formally known and six undescribed species, including 82 previous records that had been excluded based on the accuracy criteria indicated above (Table 1). Species were recorded in six relief units, the richest of them being Serra do Mar, with 30 species (six undescribed; Fig. 1), followed by Serra da Mantiqueira and Leste Catarinense, with three species each (Table 2). Northern Serra da Mantiqueira has records of all three species of this relief unit, while Southern Serra da Mantiqueira has records of only one species. In Serra do Mar, species richness increases from north to south, with records of six species (one undescribed) in Northern Serra do Mar, nine (one undescribed) in Central Serra do Mar, and 16 (four undescribed) in Southern Serra do Mar (Table 2; Fig. 1). Finally, Pré-Litorâneas, Paraíba do Sul, and Paranapiacaba relief units have records of only one species each (Paranapiacaba has records of an undescribed species; Table 2). The northernmost and southernmost records are 1,592 km distant from each other in a straight line; the species recorded in these limits are B. pulex and B. fuscolineatus, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1

Records of Brachycephalus spp. Altitude is provided in meters (above sea level).

SpeciesaRelief unitsbGroupcLocalitydStateAltitudeSource e
B. didactylusNorthern Serra da MantiqueiradidactylusMonumento Natural Serra das Torres (21°00′04″S, 41°13′17″W), municipality of Atílio VivácquaES? (600–900?)Oliveira et al. (2012), Oliveira et al. (2013)
B. didactylusNorthern Serra do MardidactylusFazenda Santa Bárbara (22°25′17″S, 42°35′01″W), Parque Estadual dos Três Picos, municipality of Cachoeiras de MacacuRJ500–800Siqueira et al. (2009), Almeida-Santos et al. (2011)
B. didactylusNorthern Serra do MardidactylusReserva Ecológica de Guapiaçu (22°24′00″S, 42°44′00″W), municipality of Cachoeiras de MacacuRJ300–520Siqueira et al. (2014)
B. didactylusNorthern Serra do MardidactylusReserva Ecológica Rio das Pedras (22°59′00″S, 44°06′45″W), municipality of MangaratibaRJ200–1,110This study, Carvalho-e-Silva, Silva & Carvalho-e-Silva (2008), Almeida-Santos et al. (2011), Rocha et al. (2013)
B. didactylusNorthern Serra do MardidactylusSacra Família do Tinguá (22°29′11″S, 43°36′18″W), municipality of Engenheiro Paulo de FrontinRJ600Izecksohn (1971), Pombal Jr (2001), Ribeiro, Alves & Haddad (2005), Alves et al. (2006), Alves et al. (2009), Silva, Campos & Sebben (2007), Verdade et al. (2008), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Campos (2011), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Pie et al. (2013)
B. didactylusNorthern Serra do MardidactylusTheodoro de Oliveira (first position: 22°22′11″S, 42°33′25″W), Parque Estadual dos Três Picos, municipality of Nova FriburgoRJ? (1,100–1,400?)This study, Siqueira et al. (2011)
B. didactylusNorthern Serra do MardidactylusTinguá (22°35′51″S, 43°24′54″W), municipality of Nova IguaçuRJ35Izecksohn (1971)
B. didactylusNorthern Serra do MardidactylusVila Dois Rios (23°11′01″S, 44°12′23″W), Ilha Grande, municipality of Angra dos ReisRJ220–240This study, Rocha et al. (2000), Rocha et al. (2001), Van Sluys et al. (2007)
B. hermogenesiCentral Serra do MardidactylusCorcovado (23°28′08″S, 45°11′29″W), municipality of UbatubaSP? (70?)Giaretta & Sawaya (1998), Verdade et al. (2008)
B. hermogenesiCentral Serra do MardidactylusEstação Biológica de Boracéia (first position: 23°39′10″S, 45°53′05″W), municipality of SalesópolisSP900Pimenta, Bérnils & Pombal Jr (2007), Verdade et al. (2008)
B. hermogenesiCentral Serra do MardidactylusFazenda Capricórnio (23°23′27″S, 45°04′26″W), municipality of UbatubaSP60Giaretta & Sawaya (1998), Verdade et al. (2008)
B. hermogenesiCentral Serra do MardidactylusPicinguaba (23°22′21″S, 44°49′53″W), Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar, municipality of UbatubaSP0–700Giaretta & Sawaya (1998), Pimenta, Bérnils & Pombal Jr (2007), Verdade et al. (2008), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Pie et al. (2013)
B. hermogenesiCentral Serra do MardidactylusReserva Biológica do Alto da Serra de Paranapiacaba (23°46′40″S, 46°18′45″W), municipality of Santo AndréSP? (800?)Verdade et al. (2008)
B. hermogenesiCentral Serra do MardidactylusReserva Florestal de Morro Grande (23°42′08″S, 46°58′22″W), municipality of CotiaSP? (990?)Dixo & Verdade (2006), Verdade et al. (2008)
B. pulexPré-LitorâneasdidactylusSerra Bonita (15°23′28″S, 39°33′59″W), municipality of CamacanBA800–930Napoli et al. (2011)
Brachycephalus sp. 1ParanapiacabadidactylusCaratuval (24°51′17″S, 48°43″43″W), near the Parque Estadual das Lauráceas, municipality of AdrianópolisPR900Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1ParanapiacabadidactylusCaratuval (24°51′14″S, 48°42′01″W), Parque Estadual das Lauráceas, municipality of AdrianópolisPR890Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1ParanapiacabadidactylusFazenda Primavera (24°53′08″S, 48°45′51″W), municipality of Tunas do ParanáPR1,060Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1ParanapiacabadidactylusFazenda Thalia (25°30′58″S, 49°40′12″W), municipality of Balsa NovaPR1,025Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1ParanapiacabadidactylusBase of the Serra Água Limpa (24°28′52″S, 48°47′12″W), municipality of ApiaíSP920This study, DZUP, Firkowski (2013; without species identification)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusAlto Quiriri (26°05′34″S, 48°59′41″W), municipality of GaruvaSC240Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusCastelo dos Bugres (first position: 26°13′47″S, 49°03′20″W), municipality of JoinvilleSC790–860Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusColônia Castelhanos (25°47′58″S, 48°54′40″W), municipality of GuaratubaPR290Cunha, Oliveira & Hartmann (2010; as “Brachycephalus aff. hermogenesi”), Oliveira et al. (2011; as “B. hermogenesi”), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusCorvo (25°20′17″S, 48°54′56″W), municipality of Quatro BarrasPR930Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusDona Francisca (26°09′52″S, 48°59′23″W), municipality of JoinvilleSC150Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusEstrada do rio do Júlio (26°17′02″S, 49°06′08″W), municipality of JoinvilleSC650Mariotto (2014; as “Brachycephalus sp.”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusFazenda Pico Paraná (25°13′29″S, 48°51′17″W), municipality of Campina Grande do SulPR1,050Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusMananciais da Serra (25°29′29″S, 48°58′40″W), municipality of PiraquaraPR1,050This study, DZUP, Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusPico Agudinho (25°36′24″S, 48°43′33″W), Serra da Prata, municipality of MorretesPR385Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusRecanto das Hortências (25°33′24″S, 48°59′38″W), municipality of São José dos PinhaisPR975This study, DZUP
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusReserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Salto Morato (25°10′00″S, 48°17′21″W), municipality of GuaraqueçabaPR45–900This study, Pereira et al. (2010; as “B. hermogenesi”), Santos-Pereira et al. (2011; as “B. hermogenesi”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusSítio Ananias (25°47′08″S, 48°43′03″W), municipality of GuaratubaPR25Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusTruticultura (26°01′33″S, 48°52′02″W), municipality of GaruvaSC90Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 1”)
B. alipioiNorthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumFazenda Aoki or Fazenda dos Japoneses (20°28′24″S, 41°00′36″W), boundary of the municipalities of Vargem Alta and Domingos MartinsES1,070–1,100Pombal Jr & Gasparini (2006), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2012), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Pie et al. (2013)
B. alipioiNorthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumForno Grande (20°31′41″S, 41°06′51″W), Parque Estadual de Forno Grande, municipality of CasteloES? (1,430?)Pie et al. (2013)
B. bufonoidesNorthern Serra do MarephippiumSerra de Macaé (22°18′02″S, 42°18′20″W), municipality of Nova FriburgoRJ? (1,100?)Miranda-Ribeiro (1920), Pombal Jr (2010), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. crispusCentral Serra do MarephippiumBacia B, Núcleo Cunha, Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar (23°15′15″S, 45°01′58″W), municipality of CunhaSP800-1,100Condez et al. (2014)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumSerra do Pai Inácio (20°48′13″S, 42°29′07″W), Parque Estadual da Serra do Brigadeiro, boundary of the municipalities of Ervália and MiradouroMG? (1,350?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumCondomínio Ermida (23°14′13″S, 46°58′52″W), Serra do Japi, municipality of JundiaíSP1,225Pie et al. (2013)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumHotel Fazenda Pé da Serra (22°51′56″S, 45°31′40″W), municipality of PindamonhangabaSP700Pie et al. (2013)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumLago Azul (22°27′23″S, 44°36′34″W), Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, municipality of ItatiaiaRJ750Pie et al. (2013)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumMaromba (22°25′43″S, 44°37′11″W), Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, municipality of ItatiaiaRJ1,125Pie et al. (2013)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumMonteiro Lobato (22°57′07″S, 45°50′20″W), municipality of Monteiro LobatoSP700Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumObservatório de Capricórnio (22°53′54″S, 46°49′01″W), Serra das Cabras, Joaquim Egídio District, boundary of the municipalities of Campinas and MorungabaSP1,085Pombal Jr (1999), Pombal Jr, Sazima & Haddad (1994), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Pie et al. (2013)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumParque Municipal de Itapetinga (Grota Funda) (23°11′07″S, 46°31′47″W), municipality of AtibaiaSP900–1,250Giaretta (1999), Giaretta et al. (1999), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Pie et al. (2013)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumReserva Biológica da Serra do Japi (23°17′07″S, 47°00′05″W), Serra do Japi, boundary of the municipalities of Jundiaí and CabreúvaSP1,000Giaretta et al. (1997), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2016), Pie et al. (2013)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumReserva Ecológica do Trabiju (22°48′01″S, 45°32′03″W), Trabiju, municipality of PindamonhangabaSP? (1,000?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumReserva Pedra Branca (22°56′22″S, 45°41′04″W), municipality of TremembéSP? (890?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumSanto Antônio do Pinhal (22°49′28″S, 45°40′20″W), municipality of Santo Antônio do PinhalSP1,080Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumSão Francisco Xavier (22°53′44″S, 45°58′04″W), municipality of São José dos CamposSP1,000Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2008), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011a), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2016), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Pie et al. (2013)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumSerra Negra (21°57′28″S, 43°47′20″W), municipality of Santa Bárbara do Monte VerdeMG?Campos (2011; as “BMV MG2”)
B. ephippiumParaíba do SulephippiumSerra da Concórdia (22°20′30″S, 43°44′04″W), Parque Estadual Serra da Concórdia, Barão de Juparanã, municipality of ValençaRJ? (900?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumAlto do Soberbo (22°27′15″S, 42°59′21″W), municipality of TeresópolisRJ1,250Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumComary (22°27′22″S, 42°58′24″W), municipality of TeresópolisRJ990Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumFloresta dos Macacos (22°58′15″S, 43°15′24″W), municipality of Rio de JaneiroRJ? (450?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumGarrafão (22°28′04″S, 43°01′52″W), municipality of GuapimirimRJ? (1,785?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumPedra Branca (22°55′55″S, 43°28′23″W), Serra da Pedra Branca, municipality of Rio de JaneiroRJ1,000Pombal Jr (2001), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumRepresa do Rio Grande (22°55′58″S, 43°26′36″W), Parque Estadual da Pedra Branca, municipality of Rio de JaneiroRJ? (150?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Pie et al. (2013)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumReserva Ecológica Rio das Pedras (22°59′00″S, 44°06′45″W), municipality of MangaratibaRJ200-1,110Carvalho-e-Silva, Silva & Carvalho-e-Silva(2008)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumRiacho Beija-flor (22°27′04″S, 43°00′04″W), Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos, municipality of TeresópolisRJ1,195Pie et al. (2013)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumRocio District (22°28′23″S, 43°14′38″W), municipality of PetrópolisRJ950Pie et al. (2013)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumSerra do Tinguá (22°35′31″S, 43°28′16″W), municipality of Nova IguaçuRJ? (950?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumVale da Revolta (22°26′17″S, 42°56′19″W), municipality of TeresópolisRJ1,035Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumVarginha (22°24′34″S, 42°52′11″W), municipality of TeresópolisRJ? (825?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumCentral Serra do MarephippiumBonito (22°42′51″S, 44°34′39″W), Serra da Bocaina, municipality of São José do BarreiroSP? (1,660?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumCentral Serra do MarephippiumEstação Ecológica de Bananal (22°48′05″S, 44°22′12″W), Serra da Bocaina, municipality of BananalSP? (1,200?)Zaher, Aguiar & Pombal (2005)
B. ephippiumCentral Serra do MarephippiumLídice District (22°50′01″S, 44°11′32″W), municipality of Rio ClaroRJ? (650?)Pombal Jr (2001), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumCentral Serra do MarephippiumPedra Branca (23°10′38″S, 44°47′19″W), Serra da Bocaina, municipality of ParatiRJ? (630?)Pombal Jr (2001), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumCentral Serra do MarephippiumPenínsula do Bororé (23°47′11″S, 46°38′45″W), Represa Billings, Grajaú District, municipality of São PauloSP780Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus nodoterga”), Abbeg et al. (2015; as “clearly refers to another species (than B. nodoterga of Pie et al. 2013)”)
B. ephippiumCentral Serra do MarephippiumReserva Florestal de Morro Grande (23°42′08″S, 46°58′22″W), municipality of CotiaSP? (990?)Dixo & Verdade (2006)
B. garbeanusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumAlto Caledônia (22°20′10″S, 42°33′20″W), municipality of Nova FriburgoRJ? (1,070?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. garbeanusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumBaixo Caledônia (22°21′33″S, 42°34′12″W), municipality of Nova FriburgoRJ1,600–1,900Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Siqueira et al. (2011), Siqueira, Vrcibradic & Rocha (2013), Dorigo et al. (2012)
B. garbeanusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumMacaé de Cima (22°21′37″S, 42°17′50″W), municipality of Nova FriburgoRJ1,130Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2008; as “B. ephippium”) Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009; as “B. ephippium”), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011a; “b”, as “B. ephippium”), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn(2011), Pie et al. (2013)
B. garbeanusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumMorro São João (22°22′47″S, 42°30′34″W), municipality of Nova FriburgoRJ? (1,550?)Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. garbeanusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumSerra de Macaé (22°18′02″S, 42°18′20″W), municipality of Nova FriburgoRJ? (1,100?)Miranda-Ribeiro (1920), Pombal Jr (2010), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. garbeanusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumSerra Nevada (22°21′46″S, 42°32′48″W), municipality of Nova FriburgoRJ1,190Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. garbeanusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumTheodoro de Oliveira (second position: 22°21′48″S, 42°33′13″W), Parque Estadual dos Três Picos, municipality of Nova FriburgoRJ1,400Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Siqueira et al. (2011), Siqueira, Vrcibradic & Rocha (2013)
B. guaraniCentral Serra do MarephippiumMorro Prumirim (23°20′50″S, 45°01′37″W), municipality of UbatubaSP500–900Giaretta (1999; altitude determined by Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2012)), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2012), Condez et al. (2014)
B. margaritatusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumCastelo Country Club (22°32′21″S, 43°13′08″W), municipality of PetrópolisRJ980Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. margaritatusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumCastelo Montebello (22°24′24″S, 42°58′06″W), municipality of TeresópolisRJ920Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. margaritatusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumIndependência (22°32′58″S, 43°12′27″W), municipality of PetrópolisRJ860Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. margaritatusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumMorro Azul (22°28′34″S, 43°34′40″W), municipality of Engenheiro Paulo de FrontinRJ620Campos (2011; as “BPF RJ2”), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. margaritatusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumQuitandinha (22°31′47″S, 43°12′26″W), municipality of PetrópolisRJ925Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. margaritatusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumSacra Família do Tinguá (22°29′11″S, 43°36′18″W), municipality of Engenheiro Paulo de FrontinRJ600Izecksohn (1971; as “B. ephippium”), Pombal Jr (2001; as “Brachycephalus cf. ephippium”), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Pie et al. (2013; as “B. ephippium”)
B. nodotergaCentral Serra do MarephippiumEstação Biológica de Boracéia (second position: 23°38′00″S, 45°52′00″W), municipality of SalesópolisSP945Pombal Jr, Wistuba & Bornschein (1998), Pombal Jr (2001), Pombal Jr (2010), Ribeiro, Alves & Haddad (2005), Alves et al. (2006), Alves et al. (2009), Haddad et al. (2010), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Pie et al. (2013), Abegg et al. (2015), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2016)
B. nodotergaCentral Serra do MarephippiumFazenda Paiva Ramos (23°28′21″S, 46°47′25″W), Serra de São Roque, municipality of OsascoSP820Abegg et al. (2015)
B. nodotergaCentral Serra do MarephippiumPico do Ramalho (23°51′42″S, 45°21′28″W), Ilha de São Sebastião, municipality of IlhabelaSP700–900Ribeiro (2006; as “Brachycephalus sp. aff. nodoterga”), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Pie et al. (2013), Abegg et al. (2015), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2016)
B. nodotergaCentral Serra do MarephippiumSerra da Cantareira (23°27′13″S, 46°38′11″W), Parque Estadual da Cantareira, municipality of São PauloSP? (850?)Miranda-Ribeiro (1920), Ribeiro, Alves & Haddad (2005), Alves et al.(2006), Alves et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2012), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2016), Haddad et al. (2010), Pombal Jr (2010), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Condez et al. (2014), Abegg et al. (2015)
B. pitangaCentral Serra do MarephippiumFazenda Capricórnio (23°22′36″S, 45°04′07″W), municipality of UbatubaSP? (450?)Alves et al. (2009), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010; as “Brachycephalus sp. 2”), Campos (2011), Pie et al. (2013)
B. pitangaCentral Serra do MarephippiumNúcleo Santa Virgínia (23°19′23″S, 45°05′19″W), Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar, municipality of São Luis do ParaitingaSP980–1,140Oliveira (2013), Tandel et al. (2014), Oliveira & Haddad (2015)
B. pitangaCentral Serra do MarephippiumSP 125 - municipality of São Luís do Paraitinga (23°22′57″S, 45°09′59″W)SP935–950This study, DZUP
B. pitangaCentral Serra do MarephippiumTrilha do Ipiranga 50 m from the Rio Ipiranga (23°20′39″S, 45°08′16″W), Núcleo Santa Virgínia, Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar, municipality of São Luis do ParaitingaSP900–960Alves et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Araújo et al. (2012), Oliveira (2013), Pie et al. (2013)
B. tobyCentral Serra do MarephippiumMorro do Corcovado (23°27′20″S, 45°11′49″W), Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar, municipality of UbatubaSP750Haddad et al. (2010), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2012), Pie et al. (2013), Condez et al. (2014)
B. vertebralisCentral Serra do MarephippiumMorro Cuzcuzeiro (23°18′03″S, 44°47′30″W), Núcleo Picinguaba, Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar, municipality of UbatubaSP900Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Pie et al.(2013), Condez et al. (2014)
B. vertebralisCentral Serra do MarephippiumPedra Branca (23°10′38″S, 44°47′19″W), Serra da Bocaina, municipality of ParatiRJ? (630?)Pombal Jr (2001), Pombal Jr (2010), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Pie et al. (2013)
Brachycephalus sp. 2Northern Serra do MarephippiumTheodoro de Oliveira (first position: 22°22′11″S, 42°33′25″W), Parque Estadual dos Três Picos, municipality of Nova FriburgoRJ1,100–1,200Siqueira et al. (2011; as “Brachycephalus sp.”), (Siqueira, Vrcibradic & Rocha, 2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov.”)
Brachycephalus sp. 3Central Serra do MarephippiumParanapiacaba (23°46′30″S, 46°17′57″W), municipality of Santo AndréSP825Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011; as “B. ephippium”), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. 1” )
Brachycephalus sp. 3Central Serra do MarephippiumParque Natural Municipal Nascentes de Paranapiacaba (23°46′10″S, 46°17′36″W), municipality of Santo AndréSP? (800–1,164?)Trevine et al. (2014; as “Brachycephalus sp.”)
Brachycephalus sp. 3Central Serra do MarephippiumReserva Biológica do Alto da Serra de Paranapiacaba (23°46′40″S, 46°18′45″W), municipality of Santo AndréSP800Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. 1”)
B. auroguttatusSouthern Serra do MarpernixPedra da Tartaruga (26°00′21″S, 48°55′25″W), municipality of GaruvaSC1,070–1,100This study, DZUP, Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Ribeiro et al. (2015)
B.boticarioLeste CatarinensepernixMorro do Cachorro (26°46′42″S, 49°01′57″W), boundary of the municipalities of Blumenau, Gaspar, and Luiz AlvesSC755–795This study, DZUP, Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Ribeiro et al. (2015)
B. brunneusSouthern Serra do MarpernixCamapuã (25°15′59″S, 48°50′16″W), Serra dos Órgãos, boundary of the municipalities of Campina Grande do Sul and AntoninaPR1,595Fontoura, Ribeiro & Pie (2011), Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013)
B. brunneusSouthern Serra do MarpernixCaranguejeira (25°20′27″S, 48°54′31″W), Serra da Graciosa, municipality of Quatro BarrasPR1,095–1,110This study, DZUP, Firkowski (2013; without species identification)
B. brunneusSouthern Serra do MarpernixCaratuva (25°14′33″S, 48°50′04″W), Serra dos Órgãos, municipality of Campina Grande do SulPR1,300–1,630Ribeiro, Alves & Haddad (2005), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Campos (2011), Fontoura, Ribeiro & Pie (2011), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011; including “Pico Paraná”), Firkowski (2013; without species identification; including “Pico Paraná”), Pie et al. (2013)
B. brunneusSouthern Serra do MarpernixGetúlio (25°14′18″S, 48°50′13″W), Serra dos Órgãos, municipality of Campina Grande do SulPR1,450–1,490This study, Pie et al. (2013)
B. brunneusSouthern Serra do MarpernixMãe Catira (25°20′51″S, 48°54′25″W), Serra da Graciosa, municipality of Quatro BarrasPR1,135–1,405Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 2”)
B. brunneusSouthern Serra do MarpernixTupipiá (25°14′31″S, 48°47′47″W), Serra dos Órgãos, municipality of AntoninaPR1,260Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013)
B. ferruginusSouthern Serra do MarpernixOlimpo (25°27′03″S, 48°54′59″W), Serra do Marumbi, municipality of MorretesPR965–1,470Alves et al. (2006), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013)
B.fuscolineatusLeste CatarinensepernixMorro do Baú (26°47′58″S, 48°55′47″W), municipality of IlhotaSC640–790Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 9”), Ribeiro et al. (2015)
B. izecksohniSouthern Serra do MarpernixTorre da Prata, Serra da Prata (25°37′25″S, 48°41′31″W), boundary of the municipalities of Morretes, Paranaguá, and GuaratubaPR980–1,340Ribeiro, Alves & Haddad (2005), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013)
B.leopardusSouthern Serra do MarpernixMorro dos Perdidos (25°53′22″S, 48°57′22″W), municipality of GuaratubaPR1,400–1,420Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 4”)
B.leopardusSouthern Serra do MarpernixSerra do Araçatuba (25°54′07″S, 48°59′47″W), municipality of Tijucas do SulPR1,640Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 4”), Ribeiro et al. (2015)
B.mariaeterezaeSouthern Serra do MarpernixReserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Caetezal, top of the Serra Queimada (26°06′51″S, 49°03′45″W), municipality of JoinvilleSC1,265–1,270Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 6”), Ribeiro et al. (2015)
B. olivaceusSouthern Serra do MarpernixCastelo dos Bugres (second position: 26°13′59″S, 49°03′13″W), municipality of JoinvilleSC800–835Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 7”), Ribeiro et al. (2015)
B. olivaceusSouthern Serra do MarpernixBase of the Serra Queimada (26°04′57″S, 49°03′59″W), municipality of JoinvilleSC985Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 7”), Ribeiro et al. (2015)
B. olivaceusLeste CatarinensePernixMorro do Boi (26°24′42″S, 49°12′59″W), municipality of CorupáSC690–920This study, MHNCI, Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. 3”)
B. pernixSouthern Serra do MarpernixAnhangava (25°23′19″S, 49°00′15″W), Serra da Baitaca, municipality of Quatro BarrasPR1,135–1,405Pombal Jr, Wistuba & Bornschein (1998), Wistuba (1998), Pires Jr et al. (2005), Silva, Campos & Sebben (2007), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010), Campos (2011), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011), Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013), Ribeiro et al. (2014)
B. pombaliSouthern Serra do MarpernixMorro dos Padres (25°36’40″S, 48°51′22″W), Serra da Igreja, municipality of MorretesPR1,060–1,300Alves et al. (2006), Clemente-Carvalho et al.(2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013)
B. pombaliSouthern Serra do MarpernixTrail to Morro dos Padres (25°35′58″S, 48°51′57″W), municipality of MorretesPR845–1,060Pie et al. (2013)
B. quiririensisSouthern Serra do MarpernixSerra do Quiriri (26°01′17″S, 48°59′47″W), municipality of Campo AlegreSC1,240–1,318Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 5”), Pie & Ribeiro (2015)
B. quiririensisSouthern Serra do MarpernixSerra do Quiriri (26°01′42″S, 48°57′11″W), municipality of GaruvaSC1,320–1,380Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 5”), Pie & Ribeiro (2015)
B. tridactylusSouthern Serra do MarpernixSerra do Morato (25°08′09″S, 48°17′59″W), Reserva Natural Salto Morato, municipality of GuaraqueçabaPR805–910This study, DZUP, Garey et al. (2012), Bornschein et al. (2015)
B.verrucosusSouthern Serra do MarpernixMorro da Tromba (26°12′44″S, 48°57′29″W), municipality of JoinvilleSC455–945Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 8”), Ribeiro et al. (2015)
Brachycephalus sp. 4Southern Serra do MarpernixMorro do Canal (25°30′55″S, 48°58′56″W), municipality of PiraquaraPR1,320DZUP, Firkowski (2013; without species identification)
Brachycephalus sp. 4Southern Serra do MarpernixMorro do Vigia (25°30′33″S, 48°58′58″W), municipality of PiraquaraPR1,250Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. nov. 3”)
Brachycephalus sp. 5Southern Serra do MarpernixPedra Branca do Araraquara (25°56′00″S, 48°52′50″W), Serra do Araraquara, municipality of GuaratubaPR1,000This study, DZUP
Brachycephalus sp. 5Southern Serra do MarpernixSerra Canasvieiras (25°36′58″S, 48°46″59″W), boundary of the municipalities of Guaratuba and MorretesPR1,080This study, DZUP, Firkowski (2013; without species identification)
Brachycephalus sp. 6Southern Serra do MarpernixSerra do Salto (25°42′07″S, 49°03′44″W), Malhada District, municipality of São José dos PinhaisPR1,095–1,160This study, DZUP, Firkowski (2013; without species identification), Pie et al. (2013; as “Brachycephalus sp. 2”)
Excluded recordsf
B. hermogenesiCentral Serra do MardidactylusUbatubaSP?Silva, Campos & Sebben (2007), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010), Campos (2011)
B. hermogenesiParanapiacabadidactylusMunicipality of PiedadeSP?Condez, Sawaya & Dixo (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b)
B. alipioiNorthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumSanta TeresaES?Pombal Jr & Gasparini (2006), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. cf. crispusCentral Serra do MarephippiumCunhaSP?Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010; as “Brachycephalus sp. 3”), Campos (2011; as “BCU SP2”)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumAtibaiaSP?Pires Jr et al. (2003), Pires Jr et al. (2005), Ananias, Giaretta & Recco-Pimentel (2006), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2008), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2009), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011b), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011a), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2016), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010), Campos (2011; as “BAT SP3”), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn(2011)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumItamonteMG?Silva, Campos & Sebben (2007), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010), Campos (2011; as “BIT MG1”)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumItatiaiaRJ?Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumJoaquim EgídioSP?Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2016)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumJundiaíSP?Miranda-Ribeiro (1920), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2008), Clemente-Carvalho et al. (2011a)
B. ephippiumSouthern Serra da MantiqueiraephippiumPiqueteSP?Miranda-Ribeiro (1920), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumAngra dos ReisRJ?Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumFloresta da Tijuca, municipality of Rio de JaneiroRJ?Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumGuapiaçu (22°26′34″S, 42°45′38″W), municipality of Cachoeira de MacacuRJ35Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumMangaratibaRJ?Campos (2011; as “BMA RJ1”), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumParque Nacional da Serra dos ÓrgãosRJ?Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumRio de JaneiroRJ?Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumNorthern Serra do MarephippiumTeresópolisRJ?Pires Jr et al. (2002), Pires Jr et al. (2005), Silva, Campos & Sebben (2007), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010), Campos (2011; as “BTE RJ4”), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn(2011)
B. ephippiumCentral Serra do MarephippiumBocainaSP?Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumCentral Serra do MarephippiumCotiaSP?Silva, Campos & Sebben (2007), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010), Campos (2011; as “BCO SP5”)
B. ephippiumCentral Serra do MarephippiumFazenda Papagaio, Serra da BocainaSP?Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumCentral Serra do MarephippiumMogi das CruzesSP?Pires Jr et al. (2005), Silva, Campos & Sebben(2007), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010), Campos (2011; as “BMC SP4”), Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. ephippiumCentral Serra do MarephippiumSerra da BocainaSP/RJ?Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. garbeanusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumNova FriburgoRJ?Silva, Campos & Sebben (2007; as “B. ephippium”), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010; as “B. ephippium”), Campos (2011)
B. margaritatusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumSítio do Pau Ferro, Morro Azul, municipality of Engenheiro Paulo de FrontinRJ?Pombal Jr & Izecksohn (2011)
B. cf. margaritatusNorthern Serra do MarephippiumPetrópolisRJ?Campos (2011; as “BPT RJ3”)
B. nodotergaCentral Serra do MarephippiumSalesópolisSP?Pires Jr et al. (2005)
B. nodotergaCentral Serra do MarephippiumSantana de ParnaíbaSP?Abegg et al. (2015)
B. tobyCentral Serra do MarephippiumUbatubaSP?Silva, Campos & Sebben (2007; as “Brachycephalus cf. vertebralis”), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010; as “Brachycephalus cf. vertebralis”), Campos (2011)
B. vertebralisCentral Serra do MarephippiumCunhaSP?Pombal Jr (2001)
B. vertebralisCentral Serra do MarephippiumParatiRJ?Silva, Campos & Sebben (2007), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010), Campos (2011)
Brachycephalus sp. 7Central Serra do MarephippiumBiritiba-MirimSP?Silva, Campos & Sebben (2007; as “B. nodoterga”), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010; as “Brachycephalus sp. 1”), Campos (2011; as “BBM SP1”)
B. brunneusSouthern Serra do MarpernixCampina Grande do SulPR?Silva, Campos & Sebben (2007), Campos, Silva & Sebben (2010), Campos (2011)
Brachycephalus leopardusSouthern Serra do MarpernixTijucas do SulPR?Campos (2011; as “BTS PR”)
B. atelopoidesSouthern Serra da Mantiqueira?PiqueteSP?Miranda-Ribeiro (1920)
Brachycephalus sp. cf. Brachycephalus sp. 1ParanapiacabadidactylusMunicipality of Ribeirão GrandeSP?Verdade et al. (2008; as “B. hermogenesi”)
Brachycephalus sp. cf. Brachycephalus sp. 1ParanapiacabadidactylusMunicipality of TapiraíSP?Verdade et al. (2008; as “B. hermogenesi”), Condez, Sawaya & Dixo (2009; as “B. hermogenesi”)
Brachycephalus sp. cf. Brachycephalus sp. 1ParanapiacabadidactylusMunicipality of JuquitibaSP?Verdade et al. (2008; as “B. hermogenesi”)
Brachycephalus sp. cf. Brachycephalus sp. 1Central Serra do MardidactylusEstação Ecológica Juréia-Itatins, municipality of IguapeSP?Verdade et al. (2008; as “B. hermogenesi”)
Brachycephalus sp. cf. Brachycephalus sp. 1Southern Serra do MardidactylusIlha do Cardoso, municipality of CananéiaSP?Verdade et al. (2008; as “possibly B.hermogenesi”)

Notes.

Species and records are ordered by the following criteria: alphabetic order of groups and alphabetic order of species by groups.

According to IBAMA (2007) with additional subdivisions (see ‘Materials and Methods’).

For group definitions, see ‘Materials and Methods’.

Geographical coordinates are based on the datum WGS84.

DZUP, Coleção de Herpetologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, state of Paraná, Brazil; MHNCI, Museu de História Natural Capão da Imbuia, Prefeitura Municipal de Curitiba, state of Paraná, Brazil.

Excluded records represent vague localities, general reference of municipality of locality, and localities that were specified but could not be located or were questionable given exceedingly low associated altitude.

Figure 1

Geographical and altitudinal distribution of Brachycephalus spp. according to their respective species group (light gray =didactylus, black =ephippium, and dark gray =pernix group) across the three sectors of the Serra do Mar relief unit.

The species connections represent the occurrence in each sector of the relief unit and in altitudinal quotas. The width of the connections (in both directions) represents the proportional amount of citations in the bibliography for each sector and altitude quotas (wider = more citations). See Table 4 for the correspondence of the acronyms with the species name.

Table 2

Number of species of Brachycephalus per relief unit.

Relief unitaNumber of groupsNumber of species (undescribed species included)
Pré-Litorâneas11 (0)
Serra da Mantiqueira23 (0)
Northern Serra da Mantiqueira23 (0)
Southern Serra da Mantiqueira11 (0)
Paraíba do Sul11 (0)
Serra do Mar330 (6)
Northern Serra do Mar26 (1)
Central Serra do Mar29 (1)
Southern Serra do Mar216 (4)
Paranapiacaba11 (1)
Leste Catarinense13 (0)

Notes.

According to IBAMA (2007), with additional subdivisions in the units Serra da Mantiqueira and Serra do Mar (see ‘Materials and Methods’).

Geographical and altitudinal distribution of Brachycephalus spp. according to their respective species group (light gray =didactylus, black =ephippium, and dark gray =pernix group) across the three sectors of the Serra do Mar relief unit.

The species connections represent the occurrence in each sector of the relief unit and in altitudinal quotas. The width of the connections (in both directions) represents the proportional amount of citations in the bibliography for each sector and altitude quotas (wider = more citations). See Table 4 for the correspondence of the acronyms with the species name.
Table 4

Altitudinal distribution and “extent of occurrence” (sensuIUCN, 2012) of Brachycephalus spp.

Only confirmed altitudinal records are considered. Extent of occurrence by altitude (Alt) or by an adaptation of the minimum convex polygon (MCP; see text for details).

SpeciesaAltitudinal distribution (m a.s.l.)Extent of occurrence (ha)
RangeAmplitudeAltMCP
didactylus group0–1,1101,110
B. didactylus (dida)35–1,1101,075??
B. hermogenesi (herm)0–900900567,589.87
B. pulex800–930130488.25
Brachycephalus sp. 1 (sp.1)25–1,0601,035778,458.42
ephippium group200–1,9001,700
B. alipioi1,070–1,10030??
B. crispus (cris)800–1,100300??
B. ephippium (ephi)200–1,2501,050??
B. garbeanus (garb)1,130–1,90077012,268.00
B. guarani (guar)500–900400??
B. margaritatus (marg)600–98038018,272.87
B. nodoterga (nodo)700–945245??
B. pitanga (pita)900–1,1402402,377.07
B. toby (toby)7500??
B. vertebralis (vert)9000??
Brachycephalus sp. 2 (sp.2)1,100–1,200100??
Brachycephalus sp. 3 (sp.3)800–82525??
pernix group455–1,6401,185
B. auroguttatus (auro)1,070–1,10030??
B. boticario755–7954011.07
B. brunneus (brun)1,095–1,6305355,687.08
B. ferruginus (ferr)965–1,4705055,475.51
B. fuscolineatus640–79015023.63
B. izecksohni (izec)980–1,340360350.43
B. leopardus (leop)1,400–1,640240176.73
B. mariaeterezae (mari)1,265–1,2705??
B. olivaceus (oliv)690–98529512,531.64
B. pernix (pern)1,135–1,405270432.10
B. pombali (pomb)845–1,300455??
B. quiririensis (quir)1,240–1,3801401,338.97
B. tridactylus (trid)805–91010541.42
B. verrucosus (verr)455–945490??
Brachycephalus sp. 4 (sp.4)1,250–1,32070??
Brachycephalus sp. 5 (sp.5)1,000–1,08080??
Brachycephalus sp. 6 (sp.6)1,095–1,160652,211.54

Notes.

Abreviation in parentheses refers to species acronyms in Fig. 1.

Notes. According to IBAMA (2007), with additional subdivisions in the units Serra da Mantiqueira and Serra do Mar (see ‘Materials and Methods’). The didactylus group comprises four species (one undescribed) encompassing the broadest geographical distribution of all three groups, from the northernmost record for the genus (state of Bahia, with B. pulex) southward to the north of Santa Catarina state, with Brachycephalus sp. 1 (Table 1; Fig. 2B). Three species occur in Serra do Mar (one undescribed), but only one species occurs in each of Northern, Central and Southern Serra do Mar (Southern Serra do Mar has records of one undescribed species; Table 3). Only one species occurs in the three remaining relief units with presence of this group (Pré-Litorâneas, Serra da Mantiqueira, and Paranapiacaba, with the latter being represented by an undescribed species; Table 3). There are no records of this group inland in the “Southern Serra da Mantiqueira” but there are records relatively further inland in “Paranapiacaba,” in the state of Paraná (Fig. 2B).
Figure 2

Occurrence records of Brachycephalus spp. (A) all species; (B) species of the didactylus group; (C) species of the ephippium group; (D) species of the pernix group.

Diamonds, records of the ephippium group; circles, records of the didactylus group; and squares, records of the pernix group. Abbreviations: BA, Bahia; MG, Minas Gerais; ES, Espírito Santo; RJ, Rio de Janeiro; SP, São Paulo; PR, Paraná; and SC, Santa Catarina. Relief units modified from IBAMA (2007).

Table 3

Number of species of Brachycephalus per group in each relief unit.

Relief unitaNumber of species per group (undescribed species included)
didactylusephippiumpernix
Pré-Litorâneas1 (0)00
Serra da Mantiqueira1 (0)2 (0)0
Northern Serra da Mantiqueira1 (0)2 (0)0
Southern Serra da Mantiqueira01 (0)0
Paraíba do Sul01 (0)0
Serra do Mar3 (1)12 (2)15 (3)
Northern Serra do Mar1 (0)5 (1)0
Central Serra do Mar1 (0)8 (1)0
Southern Serra do Mar1 (1)015 (3)
Paranapiacaba1 (1)00
Leste Catarinense003 (0)

Notes.

According to IBAMA (2007), with additional subdivisions in the units Serra da Mantiqueira and Serra do Mar (see Materials and methods).

Occurrence records of Brachycephalus spp. (A) all species; (B) species of the didactylus group; (C) species of the ephippium group; (D) species of the pernix group.

Diamonds, records of the ephippium group; circles, records of the didactylus group; and squares, records of the pernix group. Abbreviations: BA, Bahia; MG, Minas Gerais; ES, Espírito Santo; RJ, Rio de Janeiro; SP, São Paulo; PR, Paraná; and SC, Santa Catarina. Relief units modified from IBAMA (2007). Notes. According to IBAMA (2007), with additional subdivisions in the units Serra da Mantiqueira and Serra do Mar (see Materials and methods). The ephippium group comprises 13 species (two undescribed; Table 1). It has a more intermediate geographical distribution in relation to the overall latitudinal distribution of the genus, from the state of Espírito Santo to southern state of São Paulo (Fig. 2C); the species recorded in those extreme geographical limits are B. alipioi and B. ephippium, respectively. The group is represented in all relief units encompassed in this region (Serra da Mantiqueira, Paraíba do Sul, and Serra do Mar; Table 1; Fig. 2C). It is highly represented by species in Serra do Mar (12 species, two of which undescribed; Fig. 1), whereas in Serra da Mantiqueira there is records of two species and in Paraíba do Sul of only one (Table 3). Northern Serra da Mantiqueira has two species, while Southern Serra da Mantiqueira has only one (Table 3). Northern Serra do Mar has five species (one undescribed) and Central Serra do Mar has eight species (also with one undescribed); Southern Serra do Mar does not harbor any species of this group (Table 3; Fig. 1). The pernix group is the most species-rich group, with 17 species (three undescribed; Table 1). It has the smallest geographical distribution, restricted to the states of Paraná and Santa Catarina, southern Brazil (Fig. 1), comprising the southernmost distribution of the genus, with B. fuscolineatus being recorded 87 km south of the border of the state of Paraná; the northernmost species is B. tridactylus (Table 1). Per relief unit, 15 species (three undescribed) occurs in Southern Serra do Mar and three in Leste Catarinense (Table 3; Fig. 1). We were able to determine the extent of occurrence of 17 species (51.5% of all species with records at precise locations; Table 4). Two species of the didactylus group have the highest estimated extent of occurrence, with over 500 thousand ha, namely Brachycephalus sp. 1 and B. hermogenesi. On the other hand, estimates of extents of occurrence for all remaining species did not reach 20 thousand ha. With proportionally intermediate extent of occurrence, there are tree species from the ephippium group (B. garbeanus, B. margaritatus, and B. pitanga), with estimates between 2–19 thousand ha, and five species from the pernix group (B. olivaceus, B. brunneus, B. ferruginus, Brachycephalus sp. 6, and B. quiririensis), with estimates between 1–6 thousand ha (Table 4). There are four species with small extent of occurrence, between 100–500 hectares, one from the didactylus group—B. pulex—and three from the pernix group—B. pernix, B. izecksohni, and B. leopardus (Table 4). Finally, there are three species from the pernix group with highly reduced extents of occurrence, namely B. tridactylus, B. fuscolineatus, and B. boticario, with 41.42 ha, 23.63 ha, and 11.07 ha, respectively (Table 4).

Altitudinal distribution and “extent of occurrence” (sensuIUCN, 2012) of Brachycephalus spp.

Only confirmed altitudinal records are considered. Extent of occurrence by altitude (Alt) or by an adaptation of the minimum convex polygon (MCP; see text for details). Notes. Abreviation in parentheses refers to species acronyms in Fig. 1. Brachycephalus species are found from sea level to at least 1,900 m a.s.l. (Tables 1 and 3). The ephippium group was characterized by species with the broadest altitudinal amplitude (1,700 m; Table 4). The didactylus and pernix groups had similar altitudinal amplitude (1,110 m and 1,185 m, respectively; Table 4). However, the altitudinal occurrence of the didactylus group started at sea level, whereas the pernix group began at mid-elevations (455 m a.s.l.; Table 4). The altitudinal class with the highest species richness was 751–1,000 m a.s.l., with 21 species (three undescribed; Fig. 3A). The highest species richness for the didactylus group was also found between 751–1,000 m a.s.l., including all four species of the group (one undescribed; Fig. 3B). The highest richness of the ephippium group was evenly recorded between 751–1,000 m, comprising eight species (one undescribed; Fig. 3C). Finally, most species of the pernix group were found between 1,001–1,250 m a.s.l., totalizing 10 species (three undescribed; Fig. 3D).
Figure 3

Species richness of Brachycephalus in each altitudinal class (including undescribed species).

(A) all species; (B) species of the didactylus group; (C) species of the ephippium group; (D) species of the pernix group.

Species richness of Brachycephalus in each altitudinal class (including undescribed species).

(A) all species; (B) species of the didactylus group; (C) species of the ephippium group; (D) species of the pernix group. The species with the broadest altitudinal range was B. didactylus (1,075 m; starting at 35 m a.s.l.) and Brachycephalus sp. 1 (1,035 m; starting at 25 m a.s.l.), both included in the didactylus group, and B. ephippium (1,050 m; starting from 200 m a.s.l.), included in the ephippium group (Table 4). The largest altitudinal occurrence amplitude for species of the pernix group was recorded in B. brunneus (535 m; starting at 1,095 m a.s.l.; Table 4). The lowest records for the pernix group were at 845 m a.s.l. in the state of Paraná and at 455 m a.s.l. in the state of Santa Catarina, southern Brazil (Table 1). This illustrates the tendency for the altitudinal distribution of species of the pernix group to decrease with increasing latitude (Fig. 4).
Figure 4

Altitudinal amplitude records of Brachycephalus spp. from the pernix group binned into latitudinal classes (including undescribed species).

Diamonds indicate median values.

Altitudinal amplitude records of Brachycephalus spp. from the pernix group binned into latitudinal classes (including undescribed species).

Diamonds indicate median values. Syntopy in Brachycephalus is rare, being reported for the didactylus and ephippium groups in state of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, and for the didactylus and pernix groups in the state of Paraná and Santa Catarina (Table 1). Between didactylus and ephippium groups, syntopy has been reported in four localities: between B. didactylus and B. ephippium in the Reserva Ecológica Rio das Pedras, Rio de Janeiro (Carvalho-e-Silva, Silva & Carvalho-e-Silva, 2008; Almeida-Santos et al., 2011; Rocha et al., 2013); between B. didactylus and B. margaritatus in the Sacra Família do Tinguá, Rio de Janeiro (Izecksohn, 1971; Pombal Jr, 2001; Ribeiro et al., 2005; Alves et al., 2006; Alves et al., 2009; Silva, Campos & Sebben, 2007; Verdade et al., 2008; Clemente-Carvalho et al., 2009; Campos, 2011; Pombal Jr & Izecksohn, 2011; Pie et al., 2013); between B. didactylus and Brachycephalus sp. 2 in Theodoro de Oliveira, Rio de Janeiro (Siqueira et al., 2011; Siqueira, Vrcibradic & Rocha, 2013); and between B. hermogenesi and B. ephippium in the Reserva Florestal de Morro Grande, São Paulo (Dixo & Verdade, 2006; Verdade et al., 2008). Between didactylus and pernix groups, two cases of syntopy have been recorded (M Bornschein, pers. obs., 2016), one between Brachycephalus sp. 1 (didactylus group) and B. tridactylus, in Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Salto Morato, at 900 m a.s.l., and the another one between Brachycephalus sp. 1 and B. olivaceus at Castelo dos Bugres, between 800–835 m a.s.l. (M Bornschein, pers. obs., 2011; Table 1). Sympatry and possibly syntopy also between didactylus and ephippium groups was reported in the state of São Paulo in two localities (Table 1): between B. hermogenesi and Brachycephalus sp. 3 in the Reserva Biológica do Alto da Serra de Paranapiacaba (Verdade et al., 2008; Pie et al., 2013) and between B. hermogenesi and B. nodoterga in the Estação Biológica de Boracéia (Pombal Jr, Wistuba & Bornschein, 1998; Pombal Jr, 2001; Pombal Jr, 2010; Ribeiro et al., 2005; Alves et al., 2006; Alves et al., 2009; Pimenta, Bérnils & Pombal Jr, 2007; Verdade et al., 2008; Haddad et al., 2010; Pombal Jr & Izecksohn, 2011; Pie et al., 2013). A sympatry may occur between species of a single group, particularly the ephippium group, in the state of Rio de Janeiro (Table 1): between B. bufonoides and B. garbeanus in the Serra de Macaé (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1920; Pombal Jr, 2010; Pombal Jr & Izecksohn, 2011) and between B. ephippium and B. vertebralis in the Pedra Branca, municipality of Parati (Pombal Jr, 2001; Pombal Jr, 2010; Clemente-Carvalho et al., 2009; Pombal Jr & Izecksohn, 2011; Pie et al., 2013). Both need confirmation (see Pombal Jr, 2001).

Discussion

The northernmost and southernmost relief units are poorly represented by records of Brachycephalus, namely Pré-Litorâneas and Leste Catarinense, respectively. This suggests the possibility that the genus occurs farther north and south from the most extreme records known today (see Fig. 2). Interestingly, the potential distribution of Brachycephalus through environmental niche modeling (Pie et al., 2013) is consistent with the possibility of a wider distribution of the genus to the south of the current distribution, spreading widely through the Leste Catarinense relief unit (see Figs. 3A, 3B, 3E, 3F and 4A of Pie et al. (2013)). Forests at lower altitudes in the Pré-Litorâneas region are different from those in mountains at higher altitudes, displaying, for example, little moss on tree trunks and scarce epiphytic plants (MRB & RB-L, per. obs.). We believe it is possible that the occurrence of the genus in this relief unit is restricted to mountains. Examples of locations of scarce humid mountains of this region can be seen in Maurício et al. (2014), who mapped the occurrence of an endemic mountain bird to the Pré-Litorâneas relief unit, the Scytalopus gonzagai. The environmental niche modeling of Brachycephalus indeed indicates a small area of suitable habitats in this region (see Fig. 3B of Pie et al., 2013). The occurrence of B. ephippium in distinct relief units should be the subject of further scrutiny. In particular, populations under that name might indeed represent cryptic species that would have to be split (see also Dixo & Verdade, 2006; Silva, Campos & Sebben, 2007; Clemente-Carvalho et al., 2008; Clemente-Carvalho et al., 2011a; Campos, Silva & Sebben, 2010; Campos, 2011; Siqueira, Vrcibradic & Rocha, 2013; Trevine et al., 2014). Similar conditions were detected in a montane bird, Scytalopus speluncae (taxonomy according to Maurício et al. (2010)), which has to be split into several new species. In fact, the distribution of S. speluncae is congruent with that of B. ephippium in some relief units (Mata et al., 2009). The occurrence of B. ephippium around the city of São Paulo is of particular interest, given this region is characterized as a contact between Serra da Mantiqueira and Serra do Mar relief units (IBGE, 1993). For a long time, all known species of Brachycephalus of the pernix group had their geographical distribution limited to a single “Serra,” i.e., in a massif range with high altitudes, isolated from other “Serras” by areas of lower altitudes. Pie et al. (2013) were the first to report the occurrence of more than one species of the pernix group in a single “Serra,” and here we report on other similar situations. In addition, the present study is the first to report the occurrence of a species of this group distributed in two “Serras.” This is the case of B. brunneus, distributed in Serra dos Órgãos (not to be confused with the homonym “Serra” of the state of Rio de Janeiro) and Serra da Graciosa (Table 1). Distributions of more than one species in a single “Serra” involve the cases of B. ferruginus and Brachycephalus sp. 4, distributed in Serra do Marumbi, and B. leopardus, B. auroguttatus, and B. quiririensis, distributed in Serra do Araçatuba/Serra do Quiriri, a single mountain massif in the border of the states of Paraná and Santa Catarina (Table 1). These cases do not represent syntopy because all of them are isolated from each other by more than 3 km. The ocurrences of two species of the ephippium group in a single Serra are known for long time, i.e., 1920 (involving B. bufonoides and B. garbeanus; Miranda-Ribeiro (1920)) and 2001 (involving B. ephippium and B. vertebralis Pombal Jr (2001)). It is interesting to note that the species with low altitudinal records (and also with high altitudinal amplitude of occurrence) are the ones of greatest extent of occurrence measured, perhaps indicating that its relatively plastic condition provide them a major opportunity to establish through a continuous Atlantic Forest. In the other way, species with medium to high lower limit of altitudinal occurrence, and also with moderate altitudinal amplitude of occurrence, have very reduced extent of occurrence, indicating proportionaly reduced plasticity and subjection of environmental and topographic constrains. In a study on a Neotropical bird, Reinert, Bornschein & Firkowski (2007) showed that a very detailed estimate of the species extent of occurrence resulted in an area seven times greater than the area of occupancy, which underscores how much the extent of occurrence of Brachycephalus could be overstimated. In comparison, the small extent of occurrence of the Brachycephalus is not the smaller “range” of species in the world; among the smaller, there are an isopod and a fish, with less than 0.01 ha of occurrence, each (Brown, Stevens & Kaufman, 1996). However, they are between the smallest “ranges” of vascular plants and fishes of the world (<100 ha) and much smaller than the smallest “ranges” of birds and mammals of the world (∼1,000,000 ha; Brown, Stevens & Kaufman (1996)). The altitudinal records indicate that the pernix and ephippium groups are indeed “montane groups” (Figs. 1 and 3), even though the altitudinal amplitude of species of the ephippium group might be underestimated. Occasional records below 500 m a.s.l. for species of both montane groups do not mean that all “montane species” of the genus normally occur at lower altitudes, with the absence of lower records resulting from sampling bias. Rather, one could expect that species of the pernix group at higher latitudes would tend to be recorded at lower altitudes due to climatic compensation. Moreover, local records at lower altitudes of species of montane groups can be due to particular local conditions of high moisture resulting from peculiar topographical features. Regardless of the extreme altitudinal records, each species must have an altitudinal range that corresponds to its climatic optimum (see Fig. 1). Studies estimating abundance along altitudinal transects can be used not only to determine altitudinal ranges but also the climatic optimum for each species. These data are of particular interest in the context of long-term studies to assess the impact of climatic changes, with gradual modification in the abundances and even changes in the altitudinal range being expected over time (see Corn, 2005; Jump, Huang & Chou, 2012). All records of pernix group species in the state of Paraná were either made in cloud forests (“Floresta Ombrófila Densa Alto-montana” sensuVeloso, Rangel-Filho & Lima (1991)) or in the transition zones between cloud forest and montane forests (“Floresta Ombrófila Densa Montana”). The only exception is B. tridactylus, which occurs in montane forests (this study, since there is no available description for the forest type in the species description by Garey et al., 2012). Cloud or elfin forests are pygmy tropical forests that occur in highly humid regions at the cloud level, between 1,000 to 2,500 m a.s.l. (Walter, 1977). In the state of Paraná, these forests occur from 900 m to about 1,850 m a.s.l. (Struminski, 1997; Bornschein et al., 2012). The lowest record of B. pombali (845 m a.s.l.), in the transition between cloud forest and montane forest, probably represents the lowest altitude of this transition in the state of Paraná. In Santa Catarina, species from the pernix group occur in cloud forests, montane forests, and in the transition between them. The only known exception of forest habitat in the pernix group involves the observation of B. izecksohni, also in herbaceous montane fields (“campos de altitude” or “refúgio vegetacional”, sensu Veloso, Rangel-Filho & Lima (1991); M Bornschein, pers. obs., 2000). The few cases of syntopy between species, not only show little altitudinal overlap, but also involve species of different groups, consistent with the notion that closely related species remain allopatric. Localities with sympatry and syntopy are particularly interesting for further studies related to the altitudinal distribution of species. On the other hand, sympatry between species of the groups ephippium and pernix is not expected, given that a gap of 208 km occurs between species of these groups. It is interesting to note that only the montane species groups, i.e., ephippium and pernix, are highly species-rich, yet they tend not to show sympatry (although there are some species distributed very close to each other, and that there are cases of distinct species occurring in a single “Serra”). We believe that these conditions suggest that these groups evolved in allopatry and/or parapatry while the Atlantic Forest experienced retraction and isolation as islands between grasslands. During the Quaternary, climatic conditions changed cyclically from cold and dry to warmer and wet periods, and these shifts were responsible for the cyclical retraction and expansion of forest coverage, respectively (e.g., Behling & Lichte, 1997; Behling et al., 2002; Behling, Pillar & Depatta, 2005; Behling et al., 2007; Behling, 2007; Langone et al., 2008; Behling & Safford, 2010; Enters et al., 2010; Hessler et al., 2010). In colder climates, montane forests may have dispersed to lower altitudes, allowing species of Brachycephalus to disperse. In subsequent warmer and wet climate, the montane forest may have dispersed to higher altitudes, isolating populations of Brachycephalus and favoring speciation. In relation to the species distributed close to each other or in single “Serras”, without apparent geographic barriers, it is possible that the expansion and retraction of forests did not occur homogeneously across altitudinal quotas, but it might have occurred as isolated patches even in restricted areas. In areas where climatic conditions favored the return of a vast forest cover, geographically close species would have lost the corresponding environmental barriers, remaining allopatric probably due to ecological requirements. The most notable case of proximity between species occurs in northeastern state of São Paulo, where higher mountains are absent and five species occur in a single plateau (B. crispus, B. guarani, B. pitanga, B. toby, and B. vertebralis). In this region, the forests may have been confined in valleys during the periods of retraction in the forest distribution. In conclusion, Brachycephalus is restricted to the eastern portion of the Atlantic Forest biome, with species occurring in allopatry or at least in parapatry, with rare cases of syntopy. The species of the genus are segregated in three groups of species, with one of them (didactylus) including species that respond differently to altitude, occurring in lower altitudes and having greater geographic distributions, being much more ecologicaly tolerant and plastic. Species from the remaining groups (ephippium and pernix) depend on high altitude conditions and can be found locally in lower altitudes, probably in response to particular microclimatic conditions. Sympatric species include members of distinct species groups and are in contact only in the altitudinal limits of each other (higher limit for the “lowland” species and lower limit for the “montane” species). Apart from a few species, most of them have restricted extents of occurrence, to the point that many are microendemic, occurring in mountain tops with a total extent of occurrence comparable to the smallest range from species around world. The microhabitat requirements of the species can prevent more realistic estimatives of extent of occurrence, with traditional methodologies possibly resulting in substantial bias. This same feature makes the species of particular interest to monitor climate change through their abundances along altitudinal gradients. The genus also can be used as a model to infer historical environmental changes due to climatic changes, given that speciation in Brachycephalus species is thought to have resulted from vicariant processes following upward dispersal of montane forests through altitudinal ranges, in past warm and wet climates.
  20 in total

1.  The effect of miniaturized body size on skeletal morphology in frogs.

Authors:  Jennifer Yeh
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Rectification of the position of the type locality of Brachycephalus tridactylus (Anura: Brachycephalidae), a recently described species from southern Brazil.

Authors:  Marcos R Bornschein; Ricardo Belmonte-Lopes; Luiz F Ribeiro; Giovanni Nachtigall Maurício; Marcio R Pie
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 1.091

3.  Stability predicts genetic diversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest hotspot.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Carnaval; Michael J Hickerson; Célio F B Haddad; Miguel T Rodrigues; Craig Moritz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the eastern Tapaculos (Aves: Rhinocryptidae: Scytalopus, Eleoscytalopus): cryptic diversification in Brazilian Atlantic Forest.

Authors:  Helena Mata; Carla Suertegaray Fontana; Giovanni Nachtigall Maurício; Marcos Ricardo Bornschein; Marcelo Ferreira de Vasconcelos; Sandro L Bonatto
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  Phylogeography of endemic toads and post-Pliocene persistence of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.

Authors:  Maria Tereza C Thomé; Kelly R Zamudio; João G R Giovanelli; Célio F B Haddad; Flávio A Baldissera; João Alexandrino
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  Molecular systematics of terraranas (Anura: Brachycephaloidea) with an assessment of the effects of alignment and optimality criteria.

Authors:  José M Padial; Taran Grant; Darrel R Frost
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 1.091

7.  Gene and species trees of a Neotropical group of treefrogs: genetic diversification in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest and the origin of a polyploid species.

Authors:  Tuliana O Brunes; Fernando Sequeira; Célio F B Haddad; João Alexandrino
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  Demographic processes in the montane Atlantic rainforest: molecular and cytogenetic evidence from the endemic frog Proceratophrys boiei.

Authors:  Renata Cecília Amaro; Miguel Trefaut Rodrigues; Yatiyo Yonenaga-Yassuda; Ana Carolina Carnaval
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  The occurrence of 11-oxotetrodotoxin, a rare tetrodotoxin analogue, in the brachycephalidae frog Brachycephalus ephippium.

Authors:  Osmindo R Pires; Antonio Sebben; Elisabeth Ferroni Schwartz; Carlos Bloch; Rodrigo A V Morales; Carlos A Schwartz
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.033

10.  A new species of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from the Quiriri mountain range of southern Brazil.

Authors:  Marcio R Pie; Luiz F Ribeiro
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  6 in total

1.  A new species of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from Santa Catarina, southern Brazil.

Authors:  Marcos R Bornschein; Luiz F Ribeiro; David C Blackburn; Edward L Stanley; Marcio R Pie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  A new species of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from southern Brazil.

Authors:  Marcio R Pie; Luiz F Ribeiro; André E Confetti; Mário J Nadaline; Marcos R Bornschein
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  A review of the diagnosis and geographical distribution of the recently described flea toad Brachycephalus sulfuratus in relation to B. hermogenesi (Anura: Brachycephalidae).

Authors:  Marcos R Bornschein; Luiz Fernando Ribeiro; Larissa Teixeira; Ricardo Belmonte-Lopes; Leonardo Amaral de Moraes; Leandro Corrêa; Giovanni Nachtigall Maurício; Júnior Nadaline; Marcio R Pie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  An estimate of the area of occupancy and population size of Brachycephalus tridactylus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) to reassess its conservation status, with a proposal for conservation measures.

Authors:  Marcos R Bornschein; Júnior Nadaline; Luiz Fernando Ribeiro; Giovanna Sandretti-Silva; Maria Fernanda Ferreira Rivas; Bruno de Morais Guerra; Larissa Teixeira
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Two new species of the Brachycephalus pernix group (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from the state of Paraná, southern Brazil.

Authors:  Luiz F Ribeiro; David C Blackburn; Edward L Stanley; Marcio R Pie; Marcos R Bornschein
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Advertisement call of Brachycephalus albolineatus (Anura: Brachycephalidae).

Authors:  Marcos R Bornschein; Luiz Fernando Ribeiro; Mario M Rollo; André E Confetti; Marcio R Pie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.