| Literature DB >> 27760752 |
Margaret M Brosnahan1, Emily J Silvela1, Jessica Crumb1, Donald C Miller1, Hollis N Erb2, Douglas F Antczak3.
Abstract
Invasive trophoblast from Day 34 horse conceptuses survives in extrauterine sites in allogeneic recipients that are immunologically naive to donor major histocompatibility complex class I antigens. The ectopic trophoblast retains its in utero characteristics, including similar lifespan, physiologic effect of its secreted product (equine chorionic gonadotropin) upon the recipient's ovaries, and induction of host immune responses. Immunologic memory has not been considered previously in this experimental system. We hypothesized that primary exposure to ectopic trophoblast would affect the recipient's immune status such that the survival time of subsequent transplants would be altered. Secondary transplant lifespans could be shortened by destructive memory responses, as has been observed in ectopic trophoblast studies in rodents, or lengthened, as occurs when male skin grafts follow multiple syngeneic pregnancies in mice. Eight mares received two closely spaced trophoblast transplants. Both grafts for each recipient were obtained from conceptuses sired by the same stallion to provide consistency in histocompatibility antigen exposure. Donor stallions were major histocompatibility complex class I homozygotes. Cytotoxic antibody production was tracked to monitor recipients' immune responses to the transplants. Detection of serum equine chorionic gonadotropin was used as a proxy for transplant lifespan. There was no significant difference between the distributions of primary and secondary transplant lifespans, despite evidence of immunologic memory. These data demonstrate that secondary ectopic trophoblast transplants in horses do not experience earlier destruction or prolonged survival following immune priming of recipients. Mechanisms responsible for the eventual demise of the transplants remain unperturbed by secondary immune responses or chronic antigenic exposure.Entities:
Keywords: equids; immunology; reproductive immunology; transplantation; trophoblast
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27760752 PMCID: PMC5315430 DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.115.137851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Reprod ISSN: 0006-3363 Impact factor: 4.285
FIG. 1Schematic diagram depicting the ectopic invasive horse trophoblast transplants performed in recipient mares. Twenty-one ectopic trophoblast transplants (each indicated by a black X) were performed and monitored for the duration of the transplants' lifespans in eight recipient mares. All eight mares first received paired serial transplants (a). At the conclusion of the paired transplant experiment, an additional transplant was performed and monitored in mare 3875 (b). The following breeding season, mares 3876 and 4084 received another set of paired transplants, shown within the gray box (c). In recipient 3875, two chorionic girdles of identical origins were overlapped at the start of the experiment to increase the “dose” of antigen (d). This transplant (indicated by the gray X) was not included in subsequent calculations. Statistical analysis was performed on the paired transplants depicted within the red box.
Season 1 paired serial trophoblast transplant recipient and donor mares and stallions.a
ELA (MHC) Haplotypes: the two donor stallions were bred for MHC class I homozygosity at the ELA-A2 and ELA-A3 haplotypes. Other serological (ELA) designations are shown when known. ? indicates MHC haplotype for which no identifying alloantisera have been developed. Some microsatellite haplotypes correspond to serologically defined haplotypes, others have microsatellite designations only, and some are novel haplotypes that have not been validated.
ND serologic designation not determined. These five horses were tested only using polymorphic intra-MHC microsatellites.
Data presented in Figures 2A, 3A, and 7A.
Data presented in Figures 2B, 3B, and 7B.
Data presented in Figures 2C, 3C, and 7C.
Data presented in Figures 2D, 3D, 7D, and 8, B and E.
Data presented in Figures 2E, 3E, 7E, and 8, C and F.
Data presented in Figures 2F, 3F, and 7F.
Data presented in Figures 2G, 3G, and 7G.
Data presented in Figures 2H, 3H, and 7H.
This recipient was confirmed not to be of the A2 haplotype, and therefore incompatible with the donor sire, by testing with a subset of the microsatellite panel.
FIG. 2A–H) Serum eCG curves generated by paired serial ectopic trophoblast transplants in eight recipient mares. Eight mares received two serial ectopic trophoblast transplants (from the experiments indicated in Fig. 1a). Equine chorionic gonadotropin was tracked in the recipients' serum following each transplant using a commercial ELISA assay. Both primary (red dashed line labeled 1) and secondary (red dashed line labeled 2) transplants produced detectable eCG. The eCG curves were used to calculate transplant lifespan. The day of experiment, and the month and day the transplant was performed, are also indicated. The calculated lifespan of each transplant is shown below its x-axis.
FIG. 3A–H) Cytotoxic antibody titers produced by recipient mares in response to primary and secondary ectopic trophoblast transplants. Cytotoxic antibody production by recipient mares (from the experiments indicated in Fig. 1a) was determined using a lymphocyte cytotoxicity assay. All recipients' sera were free of cytotoxic antibody against donor animals at the start of the experiment. All primary (red dashed line labeled 1) transplants resulted in cytotoxic antibody production against the MHC-I of the incompatible donor sire or dam by the recipient mare. Mare 3919 (D) was compatible with the donor sire and did not produce antibodies against the sire's MHC-I, but it did produce antibodies against the incompatible donor mare of the primary transplant. Five of the eight mares still had circulating antibodies at the time the secondary (red dashed line labeled 2) transplants were performed. Mare 3919 did not produce antibodies against the compatible donor mare of the secondary transplant.
FIG. 4Length of time to increases in serum cytotoxic antibody titers following primary and secondary ectopic trophoblast transplants. Cytotoxic antibody titers were determined using a lymphocyte cytotoxicity assay. The first day that an increase in antibody titer was detected following primary and secondary transplants is plotted for each recipient that received MHC-I-incompatible transplants. Six of seven antibody responses occurred more rapidly in secondary transplants compared with primary transplants, consistent with a memory response. Open circles indicate transplants from conceptuses sired by the ELA-A2 homozygous stallion, and dark circles indicate transplants from conceptuses sired by the ELA-A3 homozygous stallion.
FIG. 5Lifespans of primary and secondary transplants during two breeding seasons. The lifespans of all paired transplants are plotted. Each symbol represents an individual animal as indicated in the legend. Horizontal bars indicate medians. During the first breeding season there was no significant difference (P = 0.0781) in the median lifespan of primary versus secondary transplants in the eight mares as determined using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Primary transplants had a median lifespan of 66 days, whereas secondary transplants had a median lifespan of 88 days. An additional set of paired transplants during the second breeding season showed comparable lifespans, with medians of 75 and 67 days, respectively.
Season 2 paired serial trophoblast transplant recipient and donor mares and stallions.a
ELA (MHC) Haplotypes: the two donor stallions were bred for MHC class I homozygosity at the ELA-A2 and ELA-A3 haplotypes. Other serological (ELA) designations are shown when known. ? indicates MHC haplotype for which no identifying alloantisera have been developed. Some microsatellite haplotypes correspond to serologically defined haplotypes and some are novel haplotypes that have not been validated.
Data presented in Figure 6, A, C, and E.
Data presented in Figure 6, B, D, and F.
FIG. 6Paired serial transplants performed during the second breeding season. Two of the original eight mares received an additional set of paired transplants the following breeding season (as indicated in Fig. 1c). Equine chorionic gonadotropin was detected in the recipients' serum following both primary and secondary transplants (A and B). Both mares still had circulating cytotoxic antibody at the time of the primary transplant (C and D). Both transplants in recipient 3876 were followed by a period of prolonged diestrus (E), whereas neither transplant in recipient 4084 produced this effect.
FIG. 8Trophoblast transplant survival in the absence of progesterone. A subset of mares in this study showed periods of seasonal anestrus while transplants were alive and functional. Following the paired-transplant study in recipient 3875, an additional transplantation was performed in January after the mare had already entered an anestrus period. The transplant remained functional for 156 days (A), and the mare did not begin normal estrus cycles until March (D). Recipient 3919 entered anestrus at the end of her secondary transplant (B and E), and recipient 4273 had a period of anestrus in the middle of the transplant life cycle (C and F).