Literature DB >> 27760362

Cellular Stiffness as a Novel Stemness Marker in the Corneal Limbus.

Tom Bongiorno1, Jena L Chojnowski2, James D Lauderdale2, Todd Sulchek3.   

Abstract

Healthy eyes contain a population of limbal stem cells (LSCs) that continuously renew the corneal epithelium. However, each year, 1 million Americans are afflicted with severely reduced visual acuity caused by corneal damage or disease, including LSC deficiency (LSCD). Recent advances in corneal transplant technology promise to repair the cornea by implanting healthy LSCs to encourage regeneration; however, success is limited to transplanted tissues that contain a sufficiently high percentage of LSCs. Attempts to screen limbal tissues for suitable implants using molecular stemness markers are confounded by the poorly understood signature of the LSC phenotype. For cells derived from the corneal limbus, we show that the performance of cell stiffness as a stemness indicator is on par with the performance of ΔNP63α, a common molecular marker. In combination with recent methods for sorting cells on a biophysical basis, the biomechanical stemness markers presented here may enable the rapid purification of LSCs from a heterogeneous population of corneal cells, thus potentially enabling clinicians and researchers to generate corneal transplants with sufficiently high fractions of LSCs, regardless of the LSC percentage in the donor tissue.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27760362      PMCID: PMC5072985          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  49 in total

Review 1.  Limbal stem cells of the corneal epithelium.

Authors:  H S Dua; A Azuara-Blanco
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Characterisation of human limbal side population cells isolated using an optimised protocol from an immortalised epithelial cell line and primary limbal cultures.

Authors:  Bakiah Shaharuddin; Ian Harvey; Sajjad Ahmad; Simi Ali; Annette Meeson
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 3.  Cell aging in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  H Rubin
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.432

4.  Substrate elasticity as biomechanical modulator of tissue homeostatic parameters in corneal keratinocytes.

Authors:  Katharina Moers; Thorsten Steinberg; Günther Schlunck; Thomas Reinhard; Pascal Tomakidi; Philipp Eberwein
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Limbal transplantation.

Authors:  D T Tan; L A Ficker; R J Buckley
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 6.  Antibodies targeting cancer stem cells: a new paradigm in immunotherapy?

Authors:  Mahendra P Deonarain; Christina A Kousparou; Agamemnon A Epenetos
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.857

7.  Biological parameters determining the clinical outcome of autologous cultures of limbal stem cells.

Authors:  Graziella Pellegrini; Paolo Rama; Stanislav Matuska; Alessandro Lambiase; Stefano Bonini; Augusto Pocobelli; Rossella Gisoldi Colabelli; Leopoldo Spadea; Romina Fasciani; Emilio Balestrazzi; Paolo Vinciguerra; Pietro Rosetta; Achille Tortori; Marco Nardi; Giovanna Gabbriellini; Carlo E Traverso; Claudio Macaluso; Lorena Losi; Antonio Percesepe; Beatrice Venturi; Francesca Corradini; Athanasios Panaras; Antonio Di Rocco; Paolo Guatelli; Michele De Luca
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 8.  Concise review: limbal stem cell deficiency, dysfunction, and distress.

Authors:  Sajjad Ahmad
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.940

9.  Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium.

Authors:  G Pellegrini; C E Traverso; A T Franzi; M Zingirian; R Cancedda; M De Luca
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-04-05       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Stiffness dependent separation of cells in a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Gonghao Wang; Wenbin Mao; Rebecca Byler; Krishna Patel; Caitlin Henegar; Alexander Alexeev; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Brillouin microscopy: an emerging tool for mechanobiology.

Authors:  Robert Prevedel; Alba Diz-Muñoz; Giancarlo Ruocco; Giuseppe Antonacci
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Microfluidic generation of transient cell volume exchange for convectively driven intracellular delivery of large macromolecules.

Authors:  Anna Liu; Muhymin Islam; Nicholas Stone; Vikram Varadarajan; Jenny Jeong; Sam Bowie; Peng Qiu; Edmund K Waller; Alexander Alexeev; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 31.041

3.  Biophysical properties of corneal cells reflect high myopia progression.

Authors:  Ying Xin; Byung Soo Kang; Yong-Ping Zheng; Sze Wan Shan; Chea-Su Kee; Youhua Tan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.699

4.  Microfluidic cell sorting by stiffness to examine heterogenic responses of cancer cells to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Muhymin Islam; Roman Mezencev; Brynn McFarland; Hannah Brink; Betsy Campbell; Bushra Tasadduq; Edmund K Waller; Wilbur Lam; Alexander Alexeev; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 8.469

5.  Biophysical subsets of embryonic stem cells display distinct phenotypic and morphological signatures.

Authors:  Tom Bongiorno; Jeremy Gura; Priyanka Talwar; Dwight Chambers; Katherine M Young; Dalia Arafat; Gonghao Wang; Emily L Jackson-Holmes; Peng Qiu; Todd C McDevitt; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Characterizing cellular mechanical phenotypes with mechano-node-pore sensing.

Authors:  Junghyun Kim; Sewoon Han; Andy Lei; Masaru Miyano; Jessica Bloom; Vasudha Srivastava; Martha M Stampfer; Zev J Gartner; Mark A LaBarge; Lydia L Sohn
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 7.127

7.  Assessment of corneal substrate biomechanics and its effect on epithelial stem cell maintenance and differentiation.

Authors:  Ricardo M Gouveia; Guillaume Lepert; Suneel Gupta; Rajiv R Mohan; Carl Paterson; Che J Connon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  YAP, ΔNp63, and β-Catenin Signaling Pathways Are Involved in the Modulation of Corneal Epithelial Stem Cell Phenotype Induced by Substrate Stiffness.

Authors:  Ricardo M Gouveia; Flora Vajda; Jason A Wibowo; Francisco Figueiredo; Che J Connon
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Microfluidic Sorting of Cells by Viability Based on Differences in Cell Stiffness.

Authors:  Muhymin Islam; Hannah Brink; Syndey Blanche; Caleb DiPrete; Tom Bongiorno; Nicholas Stone; Anna Liu; Anisha Philip; Gonghao Wang; Wilbur Lam; Alexander Alexeev; Edmund K Waller; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Biomechanical Modulation Therapy-A Stem Cell Therapy Without Stem Cells for the Treatment of Severe Ocular Burns.

Authors:  Ricardo M Gouveia; Che J Connon
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.