| Literature DB >> 27760218 |
Magda Silva Carneiro1, Caroline Cambraia Furtado Campos2, Luiz Alberto Beijo3, Flavio Nunes Ramos2.
Abstract
Species homogenization or floristic differentiation are two possible consequences of the fragmentation process in plant communities. Despite the few studies, it seems clear that fragments with low forest cover inserted in anthropogenic matrices are more likely to experience floristic homogenization. However, the homogenization process has two other components, genetic and functional, which have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to verify whether there was homogenization of tree reproductive functions in a fragmented landscape and, if found, to determine how the process was influenced by landscape composition. The study was conducted in eight fragments in southwest Brazil. The study was conducted in eight fragments in southwestern Brazil. In each fragment, all individual trees were sampled that had a diameter at breast height ≥3 cm, in ten plots (0.2 ha) and, classified within 26 reproductive functional types (RFTs). The process of functional homogenization was evaluated using additive partitioning of diversity. Additionally, the effect of landscape composition on functional diversity and on the number of individuals within each RFT was evaluated using a generalized linear mixed model. appeared to be in a process of functional homogenization (dominance of RFTs, alpha diversity lower than expected by chance and and low beta diversity). More than 50% of the RFTs and the functional diversity were affected by the landscape parameters. In general, the percentage of forest cover has a positive effect on RFTs while the percentage of coffee matrix has a negative one. The process of functional homogenization has serious consequences for biodiversity conservation because some functions may disappear that, in the long term, would threaten the fragments. This study contributes to a better understanding of how landscape changes affect the functional diversity, abundance of individuals in RFTs and the process of functional homogenization, as well as how to manage fragmented landscapes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27760218 PMCID: PMC5070737 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164814
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fragment location, fragment area and values of landscape parameters analyzed, area of forest cover, percentage of COVER (forest cover) and percentage of matrices around fragments.
| Fragment | Location | Area (ha) | Area of Forest cover (ha) | % COVER | % Coffee | % Sugarcane | % Pasture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21°29'13.13"S | 20.91 | 42.04 | 13.39 | 15.72 | 31.39 | 33.14 | |
| 46°5'40.32"W | |||||||
| 21°26'14.51"S | 22.99 | 29.45 | 9.38 | 51.83 | 0.00 | 14.02 | |
| 46°8'46.93"W | |||||||
| 21°34'42.37"S | 28.57 | 77.05 | 24.54 | 16.83 | 45.13 | 10.5 | |
| 45°58'15.04"W | |||||||
| 21°33' 44.68"S | 36.85 | 36.83 | 11.73 | 62.87 | 0.00 | 13.74 | |
| 45°56'12.80"W | |||||||
| 21°27'50.38"S | 37.05 | 42.89 | 13.66 | 0.00 | 58.33 | 0.00 | |
| 45°54'58.10"W | |||||||
| 21°25'25.97"S | 56.05 | 81.57 | 25.98 | 21.19 | 36.96 | 8.18 | |
| 46°5'8.03"W | |||||||
| 21°28'16.28"S | 81.55 | 82.99 | 26.43 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 51.56 | |
| 46°7'22.43"W | |||||||
| 21°25'27.26"S | 87.18 | 87.33 | 27.75 | 0.00 | 32.51 | 2.3 | |
| 46°9'35.66"W |
Fig 1Location of the eight fragments studied in Alfenas, Minas Gerais.
Orange polygons represent studied forest and green polygons represent others forests patches.
Functional categories studied with their respective reproductive functional types (RFTs).
| Functional Categories | Reproductive Functional Types (RFTs) |
|---|---|
| Bees | |
| Beetles | |
| Flies | |
| Generalist insects | |
| Vertebrates | |
| Wind | |
| Floral tissues | |
| Nectar | |
| Nectar/Pollen | |
| Odor | |
| Oil | |
| Pollen | |
| Shelter | |
| Without resource | |
| Small (< 1 cm) | |
| Large (> 1 cm) | |
| Anemochory | |
| Autochory | |
| Zoochory | |
| Aril | |
| Pulp | |
| Without resource | |
| Small (< 1 cm) | |
| Large (> 1 cm) | |
| Self compatible | |
| Self incompatible |
Fig 2Functional similarity.
Dendrogram of functional similarity (Bray-Curtis index) produced by a cluster analysis (UPGMA connection method) of composition of reproductive functional types (RFTs) among the eight fragments.
Fig 3Additive partition of functional diversity.
Additive partition of functional diversity for reproductive functional types (RFTs) using q = 1 (all RFTs have a weight proportional to their relative abundances). Alpha is the average diversity within the plots. Beta is the average diversity absent in the plots. Beta2 is the average diversity absent in the fragments. The sum of the alpha and beta components results in the gamma diversity of each fragment. The sum of alpha, beta, and beta2 components results in the gamma diversity of the region. Different letters indicate observed values significantly different than the expected value if the distribution were random.
Generalized linear mixed model.
| RFTs | Models | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 0.15 | 0.001 | 0.0 | 0.95 | |
| - 0.02 | 0.03 | |||
| 0.00001 | - | - | - | |
| 0.06 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 9.56 | 0.002 | 0.0 | 0.91 | |
| 7.21 | 0.002 | |||
| - 0.81 | 0.001 | |||
| 0.02 | - | - | - | |
| 0.15 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 1.30 | < 0.05 | 0.0 | 0.45 | |
| 0.31 | 0.0001 | |||
| 0 | - | - | - | |
| 0 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 1.67 | 0.27 | 0.0 | 0.73 | |
| 1.23 | 0.002 | |||
| 0.19 | - | - | - | |
| 0.08 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 5.21 | 0.004 | 0.0 | 0.49 | |
| 3.96 | 0.003 | |||
| 0.17 | - | - | - | |
| 0.41 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| - 2.82 | 0.0003 | 0.0 | 0.56 | |
| 2.04 | 0.002 | |||
| 0.41 | - | - | - | |
| 0.64 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 1.27 | < 0.05 | 0.0 | 0.42 | |
| 0.59 | 0.02 | |||
| 0.07 | - | - | - | |
| 0.28 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 8.36 | 0.001 | 0.0 | 0.37 | |
| 6.02 | 0.003 | |||
| 0.39 | - | - | - | |
| 0.63 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 9.49 | 0.05 | - | - | |
| 6.02 | 0.03 | |||
| - 0.95 | 0.04 | |||
| 0.46 | - | - | - | |
| 0.68 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 3.19 | 0.0004 | - | - | |
| 1.51 | 0.02 | |||
| 0.04 | - | - | - | |
| 0.21 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 3.19 | 0.0004 | 0.0 | 0.61 | |
| -0.57 | 0.0002 | |||
| 0 | - | - | - | |
| 0 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 3.19 | < 0.05 | 0.0 | 0.61 | |
| 2.43 | < 0.05 | |||
| -0.52 | < 0.05 | |||
| 0.008 | - | - | - | |
| 0.09 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 5.63 | < 0.05 | 0.0 | 0.48 | |
| 2.54 | 0.008 | |||
| 0.09 | - | - | - | |
| 0.31 | - | - | - | |
| Estimate | p value | ΔAICc | w | |
| 3.52 | < 0.05 | - | - | |
| 1.29 | 0.04 | |||
| -0.55 | 0.002 | |||
| 0.05 | - | - | - | |
| 0.23 | - | - | - | |
Generalized linear mixed model relating the landscape parameters and individual abundance within RFTs and functional diversity. Fragment was used as a random effect. Models with Δ AICc > 2.0 were rejected and not included in the table. ΔAICc = Difference in AIC from one model to one with the lowest AIC value. w = AICc weight.