| Literature DB >> 27760162 |
Xia Lu1,2, Jie Kong1,2, Sheng Luan1,2, Ping Dai1,2, Xianhong Meng1,2, Baoxiang Cao1,2, Kun Luo1,2.
Abstract
In the practical farming of Litopenaeus vannamei, the intensive culture system and environmental pollution usually results in a high concentration of ammonia, which usually brings large detrimental effects to shrimp, such as increasing the susceptibility to pathogens, reducing growth, decreasing osmoregulatory capacity, increasing the molting frequency, and even causing high mortality. However, little information is available on the molecular mechanisms of the detrimental effects of ammonia stress in shrimp. In this study, we performed comparative transcriptome analysis between ammonia-challenged and control groups from the same family of L. vannamei to identify the key genes and pathways response to ammonia stress. The comparative transcriptome analysis identified 136 significantly differentially expressed genes that have high homologies with the known proteins in aquatic species, among which 94 genes are reported potentially related to immune function, and the rest of the genes are involved in apoptosis, growth, molting, and osmoregulation. Fourteen GO terms and 6 KEGG pathways were identified to be significantly changed by ammonia stress. In these GO terms, 13 genes have been studied in aquatic species, and 11 of them were reported potentially involved in immune defense and two genes were related to molting. In the significantly changed KEGG pathways, all the 7 significantly changed genes have been reported in shrimp, and four of them were potentially involved in immune defense and the other three were related to molting, defending toxicity, and osmoregulation, respectively. In addition, majority of the significantly changed genes involved in nitrogen metabolisms that play an important role in reducing ammonia toxicity failed to perform the protection function. The present results have supplied molecular level support for the previous founding of the detrimental effects of ammonia stress in shrimp, which is a prerequisite for better understanding the molecular mechanism of the immunosuppression from ammonia stress.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27760162 PMCID: PMC5070816 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Summary of de novo assembly results of the transcriptome in hepatopancreas of Litopenaeus vannamei.
| Min length | Mean length | Median length | Max length | N50 | N90 | Total nucleotides | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201 | 990 | 413 | 38,359 | 38,359 | 328 | 93,657,683 | |
| 201 | 797 | 365 | 38,359 | 1,597 | 281 | 62,678,462 |
Summary of the annotations of the unigenes under ammonia stress in Litopenaeus vannamei.
| All Unigenes | Number of Unigenes | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 15,394 | 19.57 | |
| 3,101 | 3.94 | |
| 6,856 | 8.71 | |
| 12,311 | 15.65 | |
| 19,099 | 24.28 | |
| 9,483 | 12.05 | |
| 1,743 | 2.21 | |
| 22,679 | 28.84 | |
| 78,636 | 100 |
Fig 1(a) GO categorization of non-redundant unigenes from the de novo assembly of LV_E and LV_C reads, and each annotated unigene was assigned at least one GO term. (b) KOG annotation of putative proteins. (c) KEGG classification of non-redundant unigenes.
Fig 2The hierarchical clustering for the differentially expressed genes between LV_E and LV_C.
The red color shows the high expression, and the blue color represents the down expression. The color from red to blue represents the log10 (FPKM+1) from large to small.
List of the candidate genes have homologies with known proteins in Litopenaeus vannamei under ammonia stress.
| Annotation | FC | Function | Annotation | FC | Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| crustin-like protein | -3.65 | Immune Defense | single WAP domain protein | -1.39 | Immune Defense |
| ENSANGP00000021035-like | -1.38 | Immune Defense | single VWC domain protein 4 | 3.11 | Immune Defense |
| single VWC domain protein 5 | -2.43 | Immune Defense | transcription factor ATF-b | 1.02 | Immune Defense |
| putative antimicrobial peptide | -3.23 | Immune Defense | integrin beta subunit | 0.85 | Immune Defense |
| retinoblastoma family-like protein | -1.25 | Immune Defense | eukaryotic initiation factor 4A | 0.74 | Gonad development |
| sterile-alpha and armadillo motif containing protein | 2.04 | Immune Defense | prophenoloxidase activating enzyme 2 | -1.87 | Immune Defense |
| lactate dehydrogenase | 2.79 | Response to stress | HMGBb | -0.83 | Immune Defense |
| chitinase 1 precursor | 3.86 | Immune Defense | cyclin A | 2.43 | Ovarian development |
| elongation factor 2 | 0.97 | Response to stress | peritrophin | 2.44 | Immune Defense |
| serine proteinase inhibitor | 2.81 | Immune Defense | hemolin-like protein | 2.43 | Immune Defense |
| prophenoloxidase-2 | -3.66 | Immune Defense | ecdysteroid receptor E75 | 1.00 | Molting |
| X-box binding protein 1 splicing form | 1.21 | Immune Defense | prophenoloxidase activating factor | -1.74 | Immune Defense |
| alpha-2-macroglobulin | -3.03 | Immune Defense | C type lectin containing domain protein | -2.33 | Immune Defense |
| Penaeidin-2a | -3.60 | Immune Defense | Penaeidin-3d | -2.26 | Immune Defense |
| mas | -2.93 | Immune Defense | inositol-requiring enzyme-1 | 1.05 | Response to stress |
| kruppel-like factor | 1.48 | Immune Defense | cytochrome P450 | -0.94 | Immune Defense |
| Penaeidin-4a | -3.24 | Immune Defense | prophenoloxidase activating enzyme | -1.87 | Immune Defense |
| pellino | 1.10 | Immune Defense | cyclin B | 2.15 | Ovarian development |
| chicadae/profilin | 2.73 | Immune Defense | cytochrome c | 0.77 | Apoptosis |
| Kazal-type proteinase inhibitor | -2.10 | Immune Defense | integrin | 0.85 | Immune Defense |
| triose-phosphate isomerase | -0.70 | Immune Defense | glucose transporter 1 | -1.20 | Immune Defense |
| alpha glucosidase | 2.38 | Growth | phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase | 1.26 | Growth |
*, LV_E vs. LV_C log2FoldChange.
List of the genes have homologies to known proteins of aquatic species in significant changed GO terms under ammonia stress in Litopenaeus vannamei.
| Description | FC | Function | Enriched GO terms |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENSANGP00000021035-like | -1.38 | Immune Defense | • Amino sugar metabolic process |
| chitinase | -1.53 | Molting and Immune Defense | |
| ovarian peritrophin | 2.85 | Immune Defense | |
| thrombospondin II | 3.53 | Immune Defense | |
| thrombospondin protein | 3.42 | Immune Defense | |
| olfactory ionotropic receptor IR93a | 3.17 | Olfactory signaling | • Transmembrane signaling receptor activity |
| G protein-coupled receptor | -2.24 | Immune Defense | |
| Penaeidin-2a | -3.60 | Immune Defense | • Chitin binding |
| Penaeidin-4a | -3.24 | Immune Defense | |
| ecdysteroid receptor E75 | 1.00 | Molting | • Receptor activity |
| cation-independent mannose-6-phosphate receptor | 1.62 | Immune Defense | |
| Penaeidin-3d | -2.26 | Immune Defense | Carbohydrate derivative binding |
| integrin | 0.85 | Immune Defense | Receptor activity |
*, LV_E vs. LV_C log2FoldChange.
List of the genes in significantly changed KEGG pathways under acute ammonia stress in Litopenaeus vannamei.
| Gene name | FC | Description | KO ID |
|---|---|---|---|
| P450 | -2.82 | Cytochrome P450 | ko04750, ko04726 |
| F11 | -3.69 | mas | ko04610 |
| A2M | -4.58 | alpha 2 macroglobulin | ko04610 |
| CYP2J | -1.50 | CYP2 | ko00590, ko00591 |
| PLA2 | -0.72 | cytosolic phospholipase A2 | ko04750, ko04726, ko04913 |
| PP1 | -1.11 | Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase | ko04750 |
| KLKB1 | -1.86 | prophenoloxidase activating enzyme | ko04610 |
| CA1 | 2.66 | carbonic anhydrase 1 | ko00250 |
| CA3 | 3.14 | carbonic anhydrase 3 | ko00250 |
| GLT1 | 1.93 | glutamate synthase | ko00250, ko00910 |
| PPAT | 2.13 | amidophosphoribosyl transferase | ko00910 |
| DDO | -1.36 | D-aspartate oxidase | ko00910 |
| NIT2 | -0.92 | omega-amidase NIT2 | ko00910 |
| GAD | -2.16 | glutamate decarboxylase | ko00910 |
| GLS | -0.97 | glutaminase kidney isoform | ko00910 |
*, LV_E vs. LV_C log2FoldChange.
Fig 3The hierarchical clustering for the key differentially expressed genes between LV_E and LV_C from functional enrichment analysis of GO and KEGG pathways.
The red color shows the high expression, and the blue color represents the down expression. The color from red to blue represents the log10 (FPKM+1) from large to small.
Fig 4The six significant changed KEGG pathways and two nitrogen metabolism pathways: a, Linoleic acid metabolism (ko00591); b, Inflammatory mediator regulation of TRP channels (ko04750); c, Arachidonic acid metabolism (ko00590); d, Serotonergic synapse (ko04726); e, Ovarian steroidogenesis (ko04913); f, Complement and coagulation cascades (ko04610); g, nitrogen metabolism pathway (ko00910); h, alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism pathway (ko00250). The green frames represents the genes were down-regulated, and the red frames represents the genes were up-regulated.
Fig 5Validation results of RNA-seq profiles by real time PCR.