Literature DB >> 27759836

Advances in lung ultrasound.

Miguel José Francisco1, Antonio Rahal1, Fabio Augusto Cardillo Vieira1, Paulo Savoia Dias da Silva1, Marcelo Buarque de Gusmão Funari1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound examination of the chest has advanced in recent decades. This imaging modality is currently used to diagnose several pathological conditions and provides qualitative and quantitative information. Acoustic barriers represented by the aerated lungs and the bony framework of the chest generate well-described sonographic artifacts that can be used as diagnostic aids. The normal pleural line and A, B, C, E and Z lines (also known as false B lines) are artifacts with specific characteristics. Lung consolidation and pneumothorax sonographic patterns are also well established. Some scanning protocols have been used in patient management. The Blue, FALLS and C.A.U.S.E. protocols are examples of algorithms using artifact combinations to achieve accurate diagnoses. Combined chest ultrasonography and radiography are often sufficient to diagnose and manage lung and chest wall conditions. Chest ultrasonography is a highly valuable diagnostic tool for radiologists, emergency and intensive care physicians. RESUMO O exame ultrassonográfico do tórax avançou nas últimas décadas, sendo utilizado para o diagnóstico de inúmeras condições patológicas, e fornecendo informações qualitativas e quantitativas. Os pulmões aerados e o arcabouço ósseo do tórax representam barreira sonora para o estudo ultrassonográfico, gerando artefatos que, bem conhecidos, são utilizados como ferramentas diagnósticas. Eco pleural normal, linhas A, linhas B, linhas C, linhas E e Z (conhecidas como falsas linhas B) são artefatos com características peculiares. Os padrões de consolidação e de pneumotórax também são bem estabelecidos. Alguns protocolos têm sido utilizados no manuseio dos pacientes: Blue Protocol, Protocolo FALLS e Protocolo C.A.U.S.E são exemplos de três propostas que, por meio da associação entre os artefatos, permitem sugerir diagnósticos precisos. A ultrassonografia de tórax, aliada à radiografia de tórax, muitas vezes é suficiente para o diagnóstico e a conduta das afecções pulmonares e da parede torácica. Trata-se de ferramenta diagnóstica de grande valia para médicos radiologistas, emergencistas e intensivistas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27759836      PMCID: PMC5234763          DOI: 10.1590/S1679-45082016MD3557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)        ISSN: 1679-4508


INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound examination of the chest has seen consistent advances over the last few decades, with current applications reaching far beyond pleural effusion investigation. Developments in ultrasonography resulted not only in improved image acquisition and processing, but also in greater portability, with the advent of new, small-sized portable machines providing high image quality. Thoracic and lung ultrasound stands out in this novel scenario, particularly in emergency and intensive care unit settings. Sonographic assessment of chest wall changes, including scanning of costal arches, pleural spaces and lung parenchyma can provide accurate qualitative and quantitative data.( The major chest ultrasound applications are listed in this article. The imaging method has sensitivity and specificity indices ranging from 81 to 97% and 95 to 100%, respectively.( The ability to recognize major sonographic findings associated with different diseases and clinical emergency conditions is important for radiologists, particularly those specializing in emergency and intensive care medicine. Pulmonologists, emergency medicine physicians and thoracic surgeons may also benefit from this knowledge, given its potential applicability in management of traumatic conditions and in intraoperative situations.( This article provides a detailed description of chest ultrasonography. Major sonographic findings are described in a didactic manner. The applicability of the technique as a useful and accurate diagnostic tool in different medical specialties is emphasized.

ULTRASOUND PHYSICS AND ANATOMY

The aerated lungs and the bony framework of the thorax are important barriers to sonographic examination. However, solid knowledge of related acoustic phenomena and artifacts can aid in sonographic diagnosis. As an example, and comparing to transabdominal ultrasonography, the artifacts such as posterior acoustic shadowing (suggestive of biliary and renal calculi) are widely used as diagnostic aids. Subpleural acoustic artifacts once seen as limiting factors in sonographic assessment of the lungs and chest wall have been systematically described. Updated concepts have led to wider application of ultrasonography to the diagnosis of thoracic conditions that fell outside the scope of the technique in the past. Sonographic acoustic artifacts appear as lines and were given specific definitions in international standards. These lines can be used to investigate several conditions affecting the lung parenchyma and are described as follows:

Echogram pattern of the normal pleura

The echo produced by the pleura under normal conditions appears as a hyperechoic line gently and synchronously sliding with respiratory movements (Figure 1). This line and related artifacts serve as landmarks for sonographic diagnosis of thoracic conditions.
Figure 1

Sonographic anatomy. (A) Chest wall sonogram (7 MHz linear probe). (1) Observe the different tissue planes displayed: skin and subcutaneous tissue, (2) ribs (transverse plane), (3) intercostal muscles, (4) pleural line. (B) Sonographic anatomy of the chest wall (7 MHz linear probe). (1) Observe the different tissue planes displayed (from the surface down): skin and subcutaneous tissue, (2) pectoral muscles note the typical fibrillar appearance and the, (3) pleural line. (C) Echogram pattern of the normal pleura (3.5 MHz convex probe). Only the pleural line can be identified at this frequency; the parallel subpleural A line is enhanced (reverberation artifact). Low image resolution interferes with recognition of pleural line layers. (D). Pleural line. Both portions of the pleura (echoic lines indicated by measuring devices) and the anechoic space between them are displayed. The visceral and parietal pleuras correspond to the inner and outer echoic lines, respectively; the extrapleural hypoechoic line (arrow) corresponds to extrapleural fat. Note big image resolution differences; higher image resolution achieved with higher frequency probes enables detailed visualization of pleural line components

The chest wall is preferably scanned using a low frequency (3 to 5MHz) convex probe. All intercostal spaces are scanned; the patient is repositioned in bed for examination of the dorsum. Pleural line components can be separated into visceral pleura, pleural space and parietal pleura using high-resolution probes (5 to 17MHz); evaluation of normal extrapleural fat is also possible. Thorough scanning takes between 10 and 15 minutes to complete.

A Lines

A lines represent reverberation artifacts and appear as horizontal, parallel lines equidistant from each. These lines are commonly seen in healthy individuals (Figure 2) and may be erased (by B lines) or enhanced (in the presence of pneumothorax).(
Figure 2

A lines represent reverberation artifacts of the pleuropulmonary interface. These lines are equidistant from each other and become less echoic with increasing depth (arrows)

B Lines

B lines represent interlobular septa and appear as small, well-defined vertical comet-tail artifacts perpendicular to and arising from the pleural line. These lines move with the pleural line during respiration and may erase A lines (Figure 3). One or two of these lines may be seen per intercostal space in 30% of healthy individuals, particularly in dependent portions of the lung.
Figure 3

B lines appear as comet-tail artifacts (arrows) perpendicular to the pleural surface. These lines represent the reflecting interface between interlobular septa and the normal lung

B lines indicate filling of intralobular or interlobular septa and are often seen in pulmonary edema and interstitial lung diseases.( Thickened B lines may fuse together to form coalescent B lines representing peripheral lung ground glass opacities seen in high resolution computed tomography (CT).(

C Lines

C lines are defined as hypoechoic subpleural focal images generated by condensed lung tissue, without visceral pleural line gap (Figure 4). C lines are not true lines, but are designated as such for the sake of consistency with nomenclature standards.
Figure 4

C lines (contained within the square). C lines are defined as hypoechoic subpleural focal images (generated by condensed lung tissue) without visceral pleural line gap (arrow)

HSP: subpleural hypoechogenicities; DPL: pleural effusion; LIE: left lower lobe.

C lines (contained within the square). C lines are defined as hypoechoic subpleural focal images (generated by condensed lung tissue) without visceral pleural line gap (arrow)

HSP: subpleural hypoechogenicities; DPL: pleural effusion; LIE: left lower lobe.

False B lines (E and Z lines)

False B lines (E and Z lines) are vertical to the pleural line and may be mistaken for true B lines. However such lines represent different entities, as follows:

E lines

“E” stands for subcutaneous emphysema. E lines are vertical lines seen when there is gas trapped in the subcutaneous space. These lines do not arise from the pleural line, but from the subcutaneous tissue; given the gas does not move, they are not synchronous with respiratory movements (Figure 5). E lines are well-defined and also erase A lines, and may therefore be mistaken for true B lines.
Figure 5

E lines. Subcutaneous emphysema generates lines (E lines) which arise from the superficial gas, not from the pleural line

Z lines

Z lines (Figure 6) are common artifacts seen in more than 80% of the population and may be mistaken for coalescent B lines described above. Z lines are vertical, bundle-like shaped lines arising from the pleural line; however, they are ill-defined, do not erase A lines and are not perfectly synchronous with respiratory movements.(
Figure 6

Z lines are common artifacts seen in more than 80% of the population. These bundle-shaped lines arise from the pleural line (arrows), do not erase A lines and do not move in synchrony with respiratory movements

LUNG CONSOLIDATION

Lung consolidation is the increase in lung density, often in response to infectious conditions; the lung parenchyma appears similar in density to the liver due to replacement of normal lung air content by denser material. The condition is amenable to sonographic characterization provided there is no normal lung parenchyma between the pleural line and the consolidated lung (i.e., sonographic visualization is limited to peripheral lung consolidation). Consolidated lung appears tissue dense in sonography. Consolidation areas may be small, peripheral or large, highlighting permeated hyperechoic foci that are air bronchograms.( Flow mapping using color or power Doppler may be helpful to differentiate between lung consolidation and atelectasis.( Ultrasonography is also indicated for lung recruitment estimation in intensive care unit patients requiring assisted ventilation.(

Pneumothorax

Pneumothorax diagnosis can be based on three straightforward criteria:( (1) gas trapped in the pleural space obscures visualization of the underlying pleural line, so that no pleural sliding is seen. The presence of hemythorax and the absence of the lung sliding sign suggest pneumothorax (Figure 7); (2) search for B lines. B lines representing interlobular septa arise from the pleural line and can only be seen if this line is visible. The pleural line is not visible in pneumothorax; therefore, the presence of B line rules out pneumothorax;( (3) identification of the “lung point” indicating expansion of the aerated lung into the pneumothorax.
Figure 7

Pneumothorax. Lung sliding is absent (dynamic sonography); therefore, the pleural line (arrow) does not move as the patient breathes in and out

VCI: inferior vena cava.

Pneumothorax. Lung sliding is absent (dynamic sonography); therefore, the pleural line (arrow) does not move as the patient breathes in and out

VCI: inferior vena cava. Sonography is thought to have high accuracy in diagnosing pneumothorax and may outperform radiography in detecting small localized pneumothorax.(

ULTRASOUND SCANNING PROTOCOLS

Some of the current lung ultrasound protocols indicated for management of patients with acute conditions are listed below. Blue Protocol( (Bedside Lung Ultrassonography in Emergency): emergency protocol for immediate diagnosis of acute respiratory failure. This protocol describes specific sonographic findings associated with major conditions, such as pneumonia, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, pulmonary embolism and pneumothorax, with more than 90% diagnostic accuracy. FALLS (Fluid Administration Limited by Lung Sonography) protocol:( this protocol was designed to sequentially rule out differential diagnose, such as cardiogenic and hypovolemic shock, and allows for early diagnosis of septic shock. C.A.U.S.E. (Cardiac Arrest Ultrasound Exam) protocol: this protocol definitely normalizes the use of ultrasonography in cardiac arrest management. The undisputable indication of the technique in such cases and its value in detecting electromechanical dissociation are emphasized. The ability to recognize and interpret B1 lines (inter and intralobular septal thickening) and B2 coalescent lines (ground glass) contributes to improved diagnostic accuracy. Description of major echogram patterns are given below:( Hemodynamic edema: evenly spaced (approximately 7.0mm apart; distance equal to secondary pulmonary lobe diameter) B1 lines (Figure 8). The B lines represent thickened interlobular septa, just like in high-resolution lung CT. The B2 lines (Figure 9) are also present with this condition and represent the ground glass pattern.
Figure 8

B1 lines (arrows) typical of hemodynamic edema

Figure 9

Coalescent B2 lines (ground glass pattern)

Interstitial pneumonia: thickened interlobular and intralobular septa generate multiple, unevenly spaced B lines. Coalescent B lines (ground glass pattern) and decreased lung sliding motion may eventually be seen. Alveolar pneumonia: represented by lung consolidation signs described above. Even minute (millimetric) consolidations can be detected using ultrasonography, provided lesions are juxtapleural (peripheral).

DISCUSSION

Combined chest sonography and radiography are often sufficient for diagnosis and management of pulmonary conditions in hospitalized patients, particularly in emergency room, intensive care or stepdown units.( Sound knowledge of these techniques by radiologists, emergency and intensive care physicians may be crucial for proper management of several cases, reducing time to implement therapy, as compared to time required for high-resolution lung CT. Risks involved in patient transportation to the CT unit and the high financial and operational costs of CT should also be taken into account.(
  10 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided lung recruitment in a 3-month-old infant with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Yoshino Tamaki Sameshima; João Fernando Lourenço de Almeida; Murilo Marques Almeida Silva; Renata Remondini; Luciana Branco Haddad; Miguel José Francisco Neto; Marcelo Buarque de Gusmão Funari
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.657

Review 2.  International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound.

Authors:  Giovanni Volpicelli; Mahmoud Elbarbary; Michael Blaivas; Daniel A Lichtenstein; Gebhard Mathis; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Lawrence Melniker; Luna Gargani; Vicki E Noble; Gabriele Via; Anthony Dean; James W Tsung; Gino Soldati; Roberto Copetti; Belaid Bouhemad; Angelika Reissig; Eustachio Agricola; Jean-Jacques Rouby; Charlotte Arbelot; Andrew Liteplo; Ashot Sargsyan; Fernando Silva; Richard Hoppmann; Raoul Breitkreutz; Armin Seibel; Luca Neri; Enrico Storti; Tomislav Petrovic
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Lung ultrasound in evaluation of pneumonia.

Authors:  Michael Blaivas
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  C.A.U.S.E.: Cardiac arrest ultra-sound exam--a better approach to managing patients in primary non-arrhythmogenic cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Caleb Hernandez; Klaus Shuler; Hashibul Hannan; Chionesu Sonyika; Antonios Likourezos; John Marshall
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll.

Authors:  Phillips Perera; Thomas Mailhot; David Riley; Diku Mandavia
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol.

Authors:  Daniel A Lichtenstein; Gilbert A Mezière
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  Emergency Thoracic US: The Essentials.

Authors:  Sirote Wongwaisayawan; Ruedeekorn Suwannanon; Sorravit Sawatmongkorngul; Rathachai Kaewlai
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  Lung ultrasound in acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury.

Authors:  Charlotte Arbelot; Fabio Ferrari; Belaïd Bouhemad; Jean-Jacques Rouby
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 9.  Clinical review: Bedside lung ultrasound in critical care practice.

Authors:  Bélaïd Bouhemad; Mao Zhang; Qin Lu; Jean-Jacques Rouby
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  FALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock.

Authors:  D Lichtenstein
Journal:  Heart Lung Vessel       Date:  2013
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Lung Ultrasound: The Essentials.

Authors:  Thomas J Marini; Deborah J Rubens; Yu T Zhao; Justin Weis; Timothy P O'Connor; William H Novak; Katherine A Kaproth-Joslin
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-04-29

2.  How to perform and interpret the lung ultrasound by the obstetricians in pregnant women during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Authors:  Murat Yassa; Memiş Ali Mutlu; Erkan Kalafat; Pınar Birol; Cihangir Yirmibeş; Arzu Bilge Tekin; Kemal Sandal; Esra Ayanoğlu; Mahmut Yassa; Ceyhun Kılınç; Niyazi Tug
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-10-02

3.  Evaluation of lung involvement in COVID-19 pneumonia based on ultrasound images.

Authors:  Zhaoyu Hu; Zhenhua Liu; Yijie Dong; Jianjian Liu; Bin Huang; Aihua Liu; Jingjing Huang; Xujuan Pu; Xia Shi; Jinhua Yu; Yang Xiao; Hui Zhang; Jianqiao Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Pneumothorax: between the beach and the stratosphere.

Authors:  Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes Fonseca; Adham do Amaral E Castro; Yoshino Tamaki Sameshima
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 5.  Imaging findings in COVID-19 pneumonia.

Authors:  Lucas de Pádua Gomes de Farias; Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes Fonseca; Daniel Giunchetti Strabelli; Bruna Melo Coelho Loureiro; Yuri Costa Sarno Neves; Thiago Potrich Rodrigues; Rodrigo Caruso Chate; Cesar Higa Nomura; Márcio Valente Yamada Sawamura; Giovanni Guido Cerri
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 6.  From bedside to bench: lung ultrasound for the assessment of pulmonary edema in animal models.

Authors:  Jana Grune; Niklas Beyhoff; Niklas Hegemann; Jonathan H Lauryn; Wolfgang M Kuebler
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 7.  The lung ultrasound: facts or artifacts? In the era of COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Marco Di Serafino; Maria Notaro; Gaetano Rea; Francesca Iacobellis; Venere Delli Paoli; Ciro Acampora; Stefania Ianniello; Luca Brunese; Luigia Romano; Gianfranco Vallone
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.469

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.