Literature DB >> 27759799

[Basic questionnaire and methodological criteria for Surveys on Working Conditions, Employment, and Health in Latin America and the Caribbean].

Fernando G Benavides1,2, Pamela Merino-Salazar1,3, Cecilia Cornelio4, Ada Avila Assunção5, Andrés A Agudelo-Suárez6, Marcelo Amable7, Lucía Artazcoz8, Jonh Astete9,10, Douglas Barraza11,12, Fabián Berhó4, Lino Carmenate Milián13, George Delclòs14, Lorena Funcasta15, Johanna Gerke4, David Gimeno16, María José Itatí-Iñiguez4, Eduardo de Paula Lima5, David Martínez-Iñigo17, Adriane Mesquita de Medeiros5, Lida Orta18, Javier Pinilla19, Fernando Rodrigo1, Marianela Rojas11, Iselle Sabastizagal10, Clelia Vallebuona20, Greet Vermeylen21, Gloria H Villalobos22, Alejandra Vives23.   

Abstract

This article aimed to present a basic questionnaire and minimum methodological criteria for consideration in future Surveys on Working Conditions, Employment, and Health in Latin America and the Caribbean. A virtual and face-to-face consensus process was conducted with participation by a group of international experts who used the surveys available up until 2013 as the point of departure for defining the proposal. The final questionnaire included 77 questions grouped in six dimensions: socio-demographic characteristics of workers and companies; employment conditions; working conditions; health status; resources and preventive activities; and family characteristics. The minimum methodological criteria feature the interviewee's home as the place for the interview and aspects related to the quality of the fieldwork. These results can help improve the comparability of future surveys in Latin America and the Caribbean, which would in turn help improve information on workers' heath in the region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27759799      PMCID: PMC8857766          DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00210715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cad Saude Publica        ISSN: 0102-311X            Impact factor:   1.632


  14 in total

Review 1.  "The very best of the millennium": longitudinal research and the demand-control-(support) model.

Authors:  Annet H de Lange; Toon W Taris; Michiel A J Kompier; Irene L D Houtman; Paulien M Bongers
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  2003-10

2.  [Delphi Study: social actors and trends in the Brazilian health care system].

Authors:  Sérgio Francisco Piola; Solon Magalhães Vianna; David Vivas-Consuelo
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 1.632

3.  Challenging health inequalities--implications for the workplace.

Authors:  Michael Marmot; Ruth Bell
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.611

4.  [Psychosocial risk exposure among wage earning population in Spain (2004-05): reference values of the 21 dimensions of COPSOQ ISTAS21 questionnaire].

Authors:  Salvador Moncada Lluís; Clara Llorens Serrano; Ariadna Font Corominas; Ariadna Galtés Camps; Albert Navarro Giné
Journal:  Rev Esp Salud Publica       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  [Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments].

Authors:  Neusa Maria Costa Alexandre; Marina Zambon Orpinelli Coluci
Journal:  Cien Saude Colet       Date:  2011-07

6.  National working conditions surveys in Latin America: comparison of methodological characteristics.

Authors:  Pamela Merino-Salazar; Lucía Artazcoz; Javier Campos-Serna; David Gimeno; Fernando G Benavides
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-06-16

7.  A comparison of the validity of two psychiatric screening questionnaires (GHQ-12 and SRQ-20) in Brazil, using Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Authors:  J J Mari; P Williams
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF-36 Mental Health subscale and the WHO-Five Well-Being Scale.

Authors:  Per Bech; Lis Raabaek Olsen; Mette Kjoller; Niels Kristian Rasmussen
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons.

Authors:  Johannes Siegrist; Dagmar Starke; Tarani Chandola; Isabelle Godin; Michael Marmot; Isabelle Niedhammer; Richard Peter
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Working conditions and health in Central America: a survey of 12,024 workers in six countries.

Authors:  Fernando G Benavides; Catharina Wesseling; George L Delclos; Sarah Felknor; Javier Pinilla; Fernando Rodrigo
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  3 in total

1.  [The Second Central American Survey of Working Conditions and Health].

Authors:  David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras
Journal:  Arch Prev Riesgos Labor       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

2.  Development and Validation of an Interdisciplinary Worker's Health Approach Instrument (IWHAI).

Authors:  Lilian Monteiro Ferrari Viterbo; Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis; André Santana Costa; Diogo Guedes Vidal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  [RELIABILITY AND COMPLETION OF THE WORKING CONDITIONS ITEMS INCLUDED IN THE CTESLAC QUESTIONNAIRE: RESULTS FROM THE STUDY OF WORKING CONDITIONS, SAFETY AND HEALTH IN PERU].

Authors:  Iselle Sabastizagal; Alejandraª Vives; Jonh Astete; Miguel Burgos; David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras; Fernando G Benavides
Journal:  Arch Prev Riesgos Labor       Date:  2018 Oct to Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.