Johannes Thrul1, Danielle E Ramo1,2. 1. a Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco , California , USA. 2. b Department of Psychiatry , University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco , California , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Young adults underutilize current evidence-based smoking cessation strategies; yet social media are widely used and accepted among this population. A better understanding of whether and how young adults try to quit smoking in the context of a social media smoking cessation intervention could inform future intervention improvements. OBJECTIVES: We examined frequency, strategies used, and predictors of self-initiated 24-hour quit attempts among young adults participating in a Facebook intervention. METHODS: A total of 79 young adult smokers (mean age = 20.8; 20.3% female) were recruited on Facebook for a feasibility trial. Participants joined motivationally tailored private Facebook groups and received daily posts over 12 weeks. Assessments were completed at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: In 12 months, 52 participants (65.5%) completed 215 quit attempts (mean = 4.1; median = 4; range 1-14); 75.4% of attempts were undertaken with the Facebook intervention alone, 17.7% used an electronic cigarette (e-cigarette), 7.4% used nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and 3.7% used additional professional advice. Non-daily smokers, those who smoked fewer cigarettes, and those in an advanced stage of change at baseline were more likely to make a quit attempt. E-cigarette use to aide a quit attempt during the study period was associated with reporting a past year quit attempt at baseline. No baseline characteristics predicted NRT use. CONCLUSIONS: After participating in a Facebook smoking cessation intervention, young adults predominantly tried to quit without additional assistance. E-cigarettes are used more frequently as cessation aid than NRT. The use of evidence-based smoking cessation strategies should be improved in this population.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Young adults underutilize current evidence-based smoking cessation strategies; yet social media are widely used and accepted among this population. A better understanding of whether and how young adults try to quit smoking in the context of a social media smoking cessation intervention could inform future intervention improvements. OBJECTIVES: We examined frequency, strategies used, and predictors of self-initiated 24-hour quit attempts among young adults participating in a Facebook intervention. METHODS: A total of 79 young adult smokers (mean age = 20.8; 20.3% female) were recruited on Facebook for a feasibility trial. Participants joined motivationally tailored private Facebook groups and received daily posts over 12 weeks. Assessments were completed at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: In 12 months, 52 participants (65.5%) completed 215 quit attempts (mean = 4.1; median = 4; range 1-14); 75.4% of attempts were undertaken with the Facebook intervention alone, 17.7% used an electronic cigarette (e-cigarette), 7.4% used nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and 3.7% used additional professional advice. Non-daily smokers, those who smoked fewer cigarettes, and those in an advanced stage of change at baseline were more likely to make a quit attempt. E-cigarette use to aide a quit attempt during the study period was associated with reporting a past year quit attempt at baseline. No baseline characteristics predicted NRT use. CONCLUSIONS: After participating in a Facebook smoking cessation intervention, young adults predominantly tried to quit without additional assistance. E-cigarettes are used more frequently as cessation aid than NRT. The use of evidence-based smoking cessation strategies should be improved in this population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Facebook; Smoking; cessation; treatment and intervention; young adults
Authors: Susan J Curry; Amy K Sporer; Oksana Pugach; Richard T Campbell; Sherry Emery Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-06-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: David B Buller; Abigail Halperin; Herbert H Severson; Ron Borland; Michael D Slater; Erwin P Bettinghaus; David Tinkelman; Gary R Cutter; William Gill Woodall Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2014 Mar-Apr
Authors: Timothy B Baker; Megan E Piper; Danielle E McCarthy; Daniel M Bolt; Stevens S Smith; Su-Young Kim; Suzanne Colby; David Conti; Gary A Giovino; Dorothy Hatsukami; Andrew Hyland; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Raymond Niaura; Kenneth A Perkins; Benjamin A Toll Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Danielle E Ramo; Johannes Thrul; Kathryn Chavez; Kevin L Delucchi; Judith J Prochaska Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Erin A McClure; Rachel L Tomko; Matthew J Carpenter; Frank A Treiber; Kevin M Gray Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Meredith C Meacham; Ou Stella Liang; Mengnan Zhao; Christopher C Yang; Johannes Thrul; Danielle E Ramo Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Mary F Brunette; Joelle C Ferron; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Sarah I Pratt; Pamela Geiger; Samuel Kosydar Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Mary F Brunette; Joelle C Ferron; Delbert Robinson; Daniel Coletti; Pamela Geiger; Timothy Devitt; Vanessa Klodnick; Jennifer Gottlieb; Haiyi Xie; Mary Ann Greene; Douglas Ziedonis; Robert E Drake; Gregory J McHugo Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Shari P Feirman; Raymond S Niaura; Jennifer L Pearson; Allison M Glasser; Lauren K Collins; David B Abrams Journal: Addiction Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Wanting Wen; Zhu Zhang; Ziqiang Li; Jiaqi Liang; Yongcheng Zhan; Daniel D Zeng; Scott J Leischow Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 5.428