Literature DB >> 27759048

Molecular etiology and genotype-phenotype correlation of Chinese Han deaf patients with type I and type II Waardenburg Syndrome.

Lianhua Sun1,2,3,4, Xiaohua Li5, Jun Shi1,2,3,4, Xiuhong Pang6, Yechen Hu7, Xiaowen Wang1,2,3,4, Hao Wu1,2,3,4, Tao Yang1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Waardenburg syndrome (WS) characterized by sensorineural hearing loss and pigmentary abnormalities is genetically heterogeneous and phenotypically variable. This study investigated the molecular etiology and genotype-phenotype correlation of WS in 36 Chinese Han deaf probands and 16 additional family members that were clinically diagnosed with WS type I (WS1, n = 8) and type II (WS2, n = 42). Mutation screening of six WS-associated genes detected PAX3 mutations in 6 (86%) of the 7 WS1 probands. Among the 29 WS2 probands, 13 (45%) and 10 (34%) were identified with SOX10 and MITF mutations, respectively. Nineteen of the 26 detected mutations were novel. In WS2 probands whose parental DNA samples were available, de novo mutations were frequently seen for SOX10 mutations (7/8) but not for MITF mutations (0/5, P = 0.005). Excessive freckle, a common feature of WS2 in Chinese Hans, was frequent in WS2 probands with MITF mutations (7/10) but not in those with SOX10 mutations (0/13, P = 4.9 × 10-4). Our results showed that mutations in SOX10 and MITF are two major causes for deafness associated with WS2. These two subtypes of WS2 can be distinguished by the high de novo rate of the SOX10 mutations and the excessive freckle phenotype exclusively associated with the MITF mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27759048      PMCID: PMC5069774          DOI: 10.1038/srep35498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Waardenburg Syndrome (WS) is relatively common among syndromic deafness, with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 42000 in the general population and 1–3% among the congenitally deaf1. It is mainly characterized by sensorineural deafness and various types of pigmentary abnormalities including heterochromic iridis, patchy de-pigmentation of the skin and premature graying of the hair. Based on the additional symptoms, WS can be further categorized into WS type I with dystrophia canthorum (WS1, OMIM193500), WS type II without additional symptoms (WS2, OMIM 193510, 600193, 606662, 608890 and 611584), WS type III with dystrophia canthorum and upper limb anomalies (WS3, also called Klein-Waardenburg syndrome, OMIM148820) and WS type IV with aganglionic megacolon (WS4, also called Shah-Waardenburg Syndrome or Waardenburg-Hirschsprung Disease, OMIM 277580, 613265 and 613266). In many cases, the clinical phenotypes of WS are incompletely penetrant. Hearing loss, for example, was estimated to occur in 60% for WS1, 90% for WS2, but only 5% for WS423. Variable phenotypic expression can be observed both interfamilially and intrafamilially, suggesting of interplay between genetic modifiers and environmental factors. To date, six causative genes have been identified for WS, including PAX3 encoding the paired box 3 transcription factor, MITF encoding the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor, SOX10 encoding the SRY (sex determining region Y) box 10 transcription factor, SNAI2 encoding the snail homolog 2 transcription factor, EDN3 encoding the endothelin-3 and EDNRB encoding the endothelin receptor type B. Most cases of WS1 and some moderate cases of WS3 are caused by heterozygous mutations in PAX3, while homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations of PAX3 have been identified in some severe cases of WS34. In WS2, heterozygous mutations in MITF and SOX10 are estimated to account for 15% of cases each, while heterozygous mutations in EDNRB and homozygous mutations in SNAI2 haven been identified in less than 5%5. Two additional WS2 loci, WS2B (OMIM 600193) and WS2C (OMIM 606662), have been reported without pathogenic genes identified6. In WS4, Approximately 50% of cases are due to heterozygous mutations in SOX10 and 20–30% to homozygous or heterozygous mutations in EDNRB and EDN3. WS1 and WS2 were two major subtypes of WS associated with hearing loss. Unlike the former, WS2 is genetically heterogeneous and so far the genotype-phenotype correlation of the WS2 genes remains unclear. In this study, 50 Chinese Han deaf patients with WS type I and II were clinically characterized and genetically screened for mutations in PAX3, MITF, SOX10, SNAI, EDN3 and EDNRB. Our results showed that heterozygous mutations in MITF and SOX10, two major causes of WS2, have distinguishable de novo rates and clinical features.

Results

Clinical characteristics of the WS patients

The clinical features of the WS probands were summarized in Table 1. All 36 probands have sensorineural, severe-to-profound hearing loss and at least one type of pigmentary abnormalities including heterochromic iridis (n = 34), excessive freckle (n = 7), patchy de-pigmentation of the skin (n = 6) and premature graying of the hair (n = 6). No musculoskeletal anomaly or intestinal aganglionosis was observed in any of the probands. Based on the W-indexes, 7 probands were diagnosed with WS1 (W-indexes > 2.10) and 29 with WS2 (W-indexes <1.90).
Table 1

Clinical features of the 36 WS probands.

ProbandGenderAge (years)Dystopia canthorumPigmentary abnormalities*Hearing lossWS subtypeFamily history of WS
W2-1M9YesEProfoundWS1No
W9-1F16YesEProfoundWS1Yes
W22-1M5YesESevereWS1No
B5-1M5YesEProfoundWS1No
W24-1F4YesEProfoundWS1Yes
D3-1M5YesE+PProfoundWS1No
W28-1M1YesEProfoundWS1Yes
W3-1M18NoE+W+PProfoundWS2Yes
W4-1F13NoEProfoundWS2Yes
W8-1M17NoEProfoundWS2No
W10-1F19NoEProfoundWS2No
W11-1F18NoEProfoundWS2No
W12-1F2NoEProfoundWS2Yes
W17-1M1NoEProfoundWS2No
W23-1M5NoEProfoundWS2No
D680-1M1NoEProfoundWS2Yes
W25-1M9NoEProfoundWS2No
W26-1M2NoE+PProfoundWS2No
W27-1M4NoEProfoundWS2No
W47-1M1NoE+FProfoundWS2No
W14-1F15NoE+W +F+PProfoundWS2Yes
W16-4M27NoW+FProfoundWS2Yes
W18-1F31NoE+W+FProfoundWS2Yes
W19-1M3NoE+FProfoundWS2Yes
W21-1M31NoW+FProfoundWS2No
D2-1M3NoEProfoundWS2Yes
W33-1M3NoEProfoundWS2Yes
W44-1F8NoFProfoundWS2Yes
W46-1M6NoE+PProfoundWS2Yes
D50-1F4NoEProfoundWS2No
W1-1F7NoEProfoundWS2No
W7-1F11NoE+WProfoundWS2No
B118-1M3NoEProfoundWS2No
W31-1M60NoEProfoundWS2Yes
D13-1M3NoE+PProfoundWS2No
W15-1M1NoEProfoundWS2No

*E: heterochromiairidum; W: premature whitening of the hair; F: excessive freckles; P: Patchy skin depigmentation.

Intrafamilial varieties of the WS-associated phenotypes can be observed in all of the nine families with additional affected members (Fig. 1, marked by asterisks). Among them, heterochromic iridis is the most consistent intrafamilial phenotype (4/7), followed by excessive freckle (3/5), hearing loss (2/9), patchy de-pigmentation of the skin (0/2) and premature graying of the hair (0/6).
Figure 1

Pedigrees of the WS patients showing their phenotypes and genotypes.

Individuals with a number assigned participated in the current study. Phenotypes of the rest of the family members were based on relative’s description. The probands were pointed by arrows. Families with additional affected members who participated in the current study were marked by asterisks. (A) WS1 families with and without PAX3 mutations. Note in family W24, the apparent non-segregation of the p.T31S variant (marked by quotation marks) indicated a likely gross deletion in PAX3 in individual W24-3 and W24-1. (B) WS2 families with SOX10 mutations. The de novo mutations were underlined. (C) WS2 families with MITF mutations. (D) WS2 families without mutation identified.

Mutations identified in the WS patients

The mutations identified in the WS patients were summarized in Table 2 and labeled in Fig. 1. In 7 WS1 families, heterozygous mutations in PAX3 were identified in 5 of them. In addition, apparent haplotype non-segregation of a PAX3 p.T31S variant in Family W24 suggested the presence of a gross deletion in PAX3 in W24-1 and W24-3 (Fig. 1A). In 29 WS2 families, heterozygous mutations in SOX10 and MITF were identified in 13 and 10 of them, respectively (Fig. 1B,C). Seven of the 26 different mutations reported in this study were previously reported and 19 were novel (not seen in ExAC and 1000Genomes database). The majority (20/27) of the mutations were truncating or null mutations including nonsense mutations (n = 9), frameshifting indels (n = 8) and splicing site mutations (n = 2) and gross deletion (n = 1). They were predicted to lead to null alleles, prematurely stopped protein products or nonsense-mediate decay of the mRNA. The 4 missense mutations identified in this study all changed an evolutionarily conserved amino acid (Phylop scores >4.6) and were predicted to be disease-causing by all six computational tools Mutation Taster, Polyphen-2, MetaSVM, PROVEAN, SIFT and CADD (Table 3). The rest of the two mutations were a non-frameshifting insertion resulting in extra 7 amino acids in SOX10 and a non-stop mutation resulting in extra 51 amino acids in the C-terminus of MITF. None of the 26 mutations were seen in 300 ethnically matched normal hearing controls.
Table 2

Mutations identified in the WS probands.

ProbandGeneMutation typeNucletide change*Amino acid changeAllele frequencies in
NoveltyDe novo
ExAC1000 Genomes300 Chinese Han controls
W2-1PAX3Nonsensec.667C>Tp.R223X0.00000824100Reported1Yes
D3-1PAX3Nonsensec.667C>Tp.R223X0.00000824100Reported1Unknown
B5-1PAX3Nonsensec.784C>Tp.R262X000Reported2Unknown
W24-1PAX3DeletionUnspecified**Unspecified**000NovelNo
W9-1PAX3Splice sitec.1174-2A>Tp.V392fs000NovelNo
W22-1PAX3Missensec.248T>Gp.V83G000NovelUnknown
W8-1SOX10Frameshift indelc.1083delGp.G362fs000NovelYes
W10-1SOX10Frameshift indelc.1074delAp.E359fs000NovelUnknown
W11-1SOX10Frameshift indelc.495-496insAp.D167fs000NovelUnknown
W12-1SOX10Frameshift indelc.36-54del19bpp.V15fs000NovelUnknown
D680-1SOX10Frameshift indelc.400delCp.134Lfs000NovelUnknown
W25-1SOX10Frameshift indelc.1095delGp.G366fs000NovelYes
W47-1SOX10Frameshift indelc.690delCp.H230fs000NovelYes
W3-1SOX10Nonsensec.119C>Ap.S40X000novelUnknown
W4-1SOX10Nonsensec.589C>Tp.Q197X000novelNo
W23-1SOX10Nonsensec.255G>Ap.W85X000Reported3Yes
W26-1SOX10Non-frameshift indelc.396-397ins21bpp.132_133ins7aa000NovelYes
W17-1SOX10Missensec.340T>Cp.W114R000NovelYes
W27-1SOX10Missensec.326A>Gp.N109S000NovelYes
W44-1MITFFrameshift indelc.494delCp.P165fs000NovelNo
W14-1MITFNonsensec.328C>Tp.R110X000Reported4No
W21-1MITFNonsensec.763C>Tp.R255X000Reported6Unknown
W46-1MITFNonsensec.763C>Tp.R255X000Reported6No
D2-1MITFNonsensec.775C>Tp.R259X000Reported7Unknown
W19-1MITFNonsensec.808C>Tp.R270X000NovelNo
W18-1MITFSplice sitec.710+1G>Tp.P237fs000Reported5Unknown
W16-4MITFNo-stopc.1258T>Cp.X420Qext51000NovelNo
W33-1MITFMissensec.641G>Ap.R214Q000NovelNo

*The referenced sequences are NM_181459 for PAX3, NM_006941 for SOX10 and NM_000248 for MITF.

**Suggested by haplotype non-segregation of a PAX3 p.T31S variant in Family W24.

Table 3

Computational analysis of the missense mutations identified in the WS probands.

GeneMutationPhylop ScoreMutation TasterPROVEAN (score)SIFT (score)CADD (score)Polyphen-2MetaSVM
PAX3p.V83G4.921Disease causingDeleterious (−5.671)Damaging (<0.001)Deleterious (28.1)probably damagingDamaging
SOX10p.W114R4.612Disease causingDeleterious (−11.536)Damaging (0.001)Deleterious (25.7)probably damagingDamaging
SOX10p.N109S4.612Disease causingDeleterious (−4.183)Damaging (<0.001)Deleterious (24.2)probably damagingDamaging
MITFp.R214Q5.952Disease causingDeleterious (−3.721)Damaging (<0.001)Deleterious (35.0)probably damagingDamaging

De novo rates of the SOX10 and MITF mutations in WS2 probands

Parental blood DNA samples were available for 13 WS2 probands with SOX10 (n = 8) and MITF (n = 5) mutations. For 7 of the 8 WS2 probands with SOX10 mutations, the corresponding mutations were not detected in either of the parents, suggesting that the mutations occurred de novo (Fig. 1B, de novo mutations were underlined). In contrast, for all 5 WS2 probands with MITF mutations, the corresponding mutations can be detected in one of the parents (Fig. 1C). The difference of de novo rates between SOX10 and MITF mutations was statistically significant (P = 0.005).

Genotype-phenotype correlation of the SOX10 and MITF mutations in WS2

The pigmentary phenotypes of the WS2 probands with SOX10 (n = 13) and MITF (n = 10) mutations were compared in Table 4. While the percentages of WS2 probands with heterochromic iridis, premature graying of the hair or patchy de-pigmentation of the skin were not significantly different between those with SOX10 and MITF mutations (P > 0.05), excessive freckle (as shown in previous reports78), a common WS2 phenotype in Chinese Han patients, was frequent in WS2 probands with MITF mutations (7/10) but absent in those with SOX10 mutations (0/13, P = 4.9 × 10−4). Logistic regression analysis showed that this excessive freckle phenotype was not affected by other confounding factors such as gender or age of the patients (P = 0.8129 and 0.1559, respectively, Supplementary Table S1).
Table 4

Pigmentary abnormalities in WS2 probands with SOX10 and MITF mutations.

PhenotypesNumbers (%) of WS2 probands
P-values
with SOX10 mutationswith MITF mutations
Heterochromic iridis13 (100)7 (70)0.068
Premature graying of the hair1 (8)4 (40)0.127
Patchy de-pigmentation of the skin3 (23)1 (10)0.604
Excessive freckles0 (0)7 (70)4.9×104
Total13 (100)10 (100)

Discussion

In this study, we aimed to explore the molecular etiology and genotype-phenotype correlation in deaf patients associated with WS. Among 36 probands, 7 and 29 can be classified as WS1 and WS2, respectively, based on their clinical phenotype (Table 1) and molecular diagnosis (Table 2), showing that WS1 and WS2 were two major WS subtypes associated with hearing loss. While mutations in PAX3 were the major cause for WS1 (6/7), the molecular etiology of WS2 was heterogeneous and attributable to two major causative genes SOX10 (13/29) and MITF (10/29). By parental genotyping, we revealed an interesting inheritance pattern in WS2, as de novo mutations were frequently found in WS2 probands with SOX10 mutations (7/8) but not in those with MITF mutations (0/5, P = 0.005). Notably, no evidence suggested that the seven de novo mutations in SOX10 were from mutation hot-spots, as they occurred at different nucleotide positions and six of them were not previously reported (Table 2). The high de novo rates of SOX10 mutations in WS2 may need special attention during the course of genetic diagnosis and counseling, as it can be initially mistaken as recessive inheritance prior to testing or be interpreted with over-estimated recurrent risk without further parental testing. Consistent with its pathogenic role in WS2, MITF encodes a basic helix-loop-helix, leucine zipper transcription factor that plays a critical function in survival and differentiation of melanocytes that produce melanin pigments9. SOX10, the SRY-related transcription factor, binds to MITF promoter and directly activates MITF’s expression10. Mutations in those two genes, therefore, are likely involved in the pathogenesis of WS2 through the same pathway and produce similar clinical phenotypes. Based on previous reports, the clinical features of WS2 were indeed indistinguishable between that resulted from SOX10 and MITF mutations11. In this study, we compared the pigmentary abnormalities between WS2 probands with SOX10 and MITF mutations (Table 4). Both previous reports and the present study showed that excessive freckle was frequently observed in Chinese Han WS patients7. Interestingly, this special subtype of cutaneous pigmentary disturbance appeared to be unique for WS2 probands with MITF mutations (7/10) but was absent in those with SOX10 mutations (0/13, P = 4.9 × 10−4). To our knowledge, this is the first report showing the clinical differences between WS2 patients with SOX10 and MITF mutations. In conclusion, our study revealed that WS2 due to SOX10 and MITF mutations have discrepant de novo mutation rates and distinguishable clinical feature in excessive freckle. These new findings may facilitate precise diagnosis and genetic counseling of the heterogeneous WS2.

Methods and Materials

Patients

Thirty-six Chinese Han deaf probands clinically diagnosed with WS were recruited through their visit to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai, China. Fourteen of them reported family history of WS features including hearing impairment, heterochromia iridis, premature graying of the hair, excessive freckle and patchy de-pigmentation of the skin. A total of 16 additional affected members from 9 families (marked by asterisks in Fig. 1) were subsequently recruited into this study. All patients or guardians gave written, informed consent to participate in this study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and was in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Clinical evaluations

Comprehensive auditory, ophthalmologic, dermatologic and neurological examinations were performed on all subjects. Auditory evaluations included otoscope examination, tympanometry, pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and/or auditory brainstem response (ABR, used for subjects with very young age). Degree of hearing impairment was calculated as the average of the hearing levels at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 KHz for the better ear. The severity of hearing impairment was defined as mild (20–40 dB), moderate (41–70 dB), severe (71–95 dB) and profound (>95 dB). Special attention was given to the pigmentary abnormalities of iris, skin and hair as well as the developmental defects including dystopia canthorum, limb abnormalities and intestinal aganglionosis. W-index, the biometric index of dystopia canthorum was measured as previously described1. The patients were categorized into subtypes of WS according to the criteria proposed by the WS consortium1.

Mutation analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples using the Blood DNA kit (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing, China). Mutation screening of PAX3, MITF, SOX10, SNAI2, EDN3 and EDNRB was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing of all exons and flanking splicing sites. Possible pathogenic effects of the missense mutations were evaluated by computational tools including Mutation Taster, Polyphen-2, MetaSVM, PROVEAN (cut-off score <−1.3), SIFT (cut-off score <0.05) and CADD (cut-off score >20).

Statistical analysis

Fisher’s exact test was used to compare: 1) percentages of WS2 probands carrying de novo mutations between those with MITF and SOX10 mutations; 2) percentages of WS2 probands exhibiting various pigmentary phenotypes between those with MITF and SOX10 mutations (The P-value thresholds of significance were set as 0.05/4 = 0.0125 for Bonferroni correction of multiple testing in the latter). P-values were presented as the result of the two-tailed analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to test the potential confounding effects of gender and age on the excessive freckle phenotype.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Sun, L. et al. Molecular etiology and genotype-phenotype correlation of Chinese Han deaf patients with type I and type II Waardenburg Syndrome. Sci. Rep. 6, 35498; doi: 10.1038/srep35498 (2016).
  11 in total

Review 1.  Waardenburg syndrome.

Authors:  A P Read; V E Newton
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Regulation of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor gene by the Waardenburg syndrome type 4 gene, SOX10.

Authors:  C Verastegui; K Bille; J P Ortonne; R Ballotti
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-06       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Novel mutations of PAX3, MITF, and SOX10 genes in Chinese patients with type I or type II Waardenburg syndrome.

Authors:  Hongsheng Chen; Lu Jiang; Zhiguo Xie; Lingyun Mei; Chufeng He; Zhengmao Hu; Kun Xia; Yong Feng
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 4.  Pigmentary anomalies and hearing loss.

Authors:  Helga V Toriello
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-24

5.  Cytogenetic mapping of a novel locus for type II Waardenburg syndrome.

Authors:  Angelo Selicorni; Silvana Guerneri; Antonia Ratti; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11-10       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Double heterozygous mutations of MITF and PAX3 result in Waardenburg syndrome with increased penetrance in pigmentary defects.

Authors:  T Yang; X Li; Q Huang; L Li; Y Chai; L Sun; X Wang; Y Zhu; Z Wang; Z Huang; Y Li; H Wu
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Mutations at the mouse microphthalmia locus are associated with defects in a gene encoding a novel basic-helix-loop-helix-zipper protein.

Authors:  C A Hodgkinson; K J Moore; A Nakayama; E Steingrímsson; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins; H Arnheiter
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-07-30       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Hearing loss and Waardenburg's syndrome: implications for genetic counselling.

Authors:  V Newton
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.469

9.  Mutations in the paired domain of the human PAX3 gene cause Klein-Waardenburg syndrome (WS-III) as well as Waardenburg syndrome type I (WS-I).

Authors:  C F Hoth; A Milunsky; N Lipsky; R Sheffer; S K Clarren; C T Baldwin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  A missense mutation of the endothelin-B receptor gene in multigenic Hirschsprung's disease.

Authors:  E G Puffenberger; K Hosoda; S S Washington; K Nakao; D deWit; M Yanagisawa; A Chakravart
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-12-30       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  10 in total

1.  Whole-exome sequencing analysis of Waardenburg syndrome in a Chinese family.

Authors:  Dezhong Chen; Na Zhao; Jing Wang; Zhuoyu Li; Changxin Wu; Jie Fu; Han Xiao
Journal:  Hum Genome Var       Date:  2017-06-29

2.  Functional analysis of a nonstop mutation in MITF gene identified in a patient with Waardenburg syndrome type 2.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Ziqi Hao; Hunjin Luo; Chufeng He; Lingyun Mei; Yalan Liu; Xueping Wang; Zhijie Niu; Hongsheng Chen; Jia-Da Li; Yong Feng
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Identifies Separate Causes of Hearing Loss in One Deaf Family and Variable Clinical Manifestations for the p.R161C Mutation in SOX10.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Yu; Yun Lin; Hao Wu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Comprehensive Geno- and Phenotyping in a Complex Pedigree Including Four Different Inherited Retinal Dystrophies.

Authors:  Johannes Birtel; Martin Gliem; Kristina Hess; Theresa H Birtel; Frank G Holz; Ulrich Zechner; Hanno J Bolz; Philipp Herrmann
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  A Novel Spontaneous Mutation of the SOX10 Gene Associated with Waardenburg Syndrome Type II.

Authors:  Sen Chen; Yuan Jin; Le Xie; Wen Xie; Kai Xu; Yue Qiu; Xue Bai; Hui-Min Zhang; Xiao-Zhou Liu; Xiao-Hui Wang; Wei-Jia Kong; Yu Sun
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  A follow-up study of a Chinese family with Waardenburg syndrome type II caused by a truncating mutation of MITF gene.

Authors:  Shuzhi Yang; Cuicui Wang; Chengyong Zhou; DongYang Kang; Xin Zhang; Huijun Yuan
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.183

7.  Predicting pathogenicity for novel hearing loss mutations based on genetic and protein structure approaches.

Authors:  Paula I Buonfiglio; Carlos D Bruque; Vanesa Lotersztein; Leonela Luce; Florencia Giliberto; Sebastián Menazzi; Liliana Francipane; Bibiana Paoli; Ernesto Goldschmidt; Ana Belén Elgoyhen; Viviana Dalamón
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Analysis of genotype-phenotype relationships in 90 Chinese probands with Waardenburg syndrome.

Authors:  Guojian Wang; Xiaohong Li; Xue Gao; Yu Su; Mingyu Han; Bo Gao; Chang Guo; Dongyang Kang; Shasha Huang; Yongyi Yuan; Pu Dai
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  SOX10 Mutation Screening for 117 Patients with Kallmann Syndrome.

Authors:  Hirohito Shima; Etsuro Tokuhiro; Shingo Okamoto; Mariko Nagamori; Tsutomu Ogata; Satoshi Narumi; Akie Nakamura; Yoko Izumi; Tomoko Jinno; Erina Suzuki; Maki Fukami
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2021-03-30

10.  High Genetic Heterogeneity in Chinese Patients With Waardenburg Syndrome Revealed by Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Sen Zhang; Hongen Xu; Yongan Tian; Danhua Liu; Xinyue Hou; Beiping Zeng; Bei Chen; Huanfei Liu; Ruijun Li; Xiaohua Li; Bin Zuo; Ryan Tang; Wenxue Tang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.599

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.