Literature DB >> 27757420

In silico discovery of metal-organic frameworks for precombustion CO2 capture using a genetic algorithm.

Yongchul G Chung1, Diego A Gómez-Gualdrón2, Peng Li3, Karson T Leperi1, Pravas Deria3, Hongda Zhang1, Nicolaas A Vermeulen3, J Fraser Stoddart3, Fengqi You1, Joseph T Hupp3, Omar K Farha4, Randall Q Snurr1.   

Abstract

Discovery of new adsorbent materials with a high CO2 working capacity could help reduce CO2 emissions from newly commissioned power plants using precombustion carbon capture. High-throughput computational screening efforts can accelerate the discovery of new adsorbents but sometimes require significant computational resources to explore the large space of possible materials. We report the in silico discovery of high-performing adsorbents for precombustion CO2 capture by applying a genetic algorithm to efficiently search a large database of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for top candidates. High-performing MOFs identified from the in silico search were synthesized and activated and show a high CO2 working capacity and a high CO2/H2 selectivity. One of the synthesized MOFs shows a higher CO2 working capacity than any MOF reported in the literature under the operating conditions investigated here.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pre-combustion carbon capture; genetic algorithm; high-throughput material screening; materials genome; molecular simulation

Year:  2016        PMID: 27757420      PMCID: PMC5065252          DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1600909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Adv        ISSN: 2375-2548            Impact factor:   14.136


INTRODUCTION

Scientists, political leaders, and common citizens around the world are increasingly alarmed by the rapidly rising levels of CO2 in the atmosphere (–). In the United States, nearly 40% of CO2 emissions come from burning fossil fuels to generate electricity in power plants (). Because renewable energy sources (such as wind and solar) are still far from replacing fossil fuels as the primary energy source to power the planet, almost all recent scenarios put forth to reduce CO2 emissions include a significant midterm role for carbon capture and storage. Capturing CO2 from existing power plants requires the separation of dilute amounts of CO2 from N2 in a low-pressure stream via a so-called “postcombustion” strategy. An easier strategy for newly commissioned power plants is to use “precombustion” CO2 capture technology. An example of precombustion CO2 capture is shown in Fig. 1 where natural gas is reformed to produce syngas (a mixture of CO and H2), which is run through a water-gas shift reaction (WGSR) to produce a high-pressure stream of CO2 and H2. The CO2 is then removed from this stream, and the resulting H2 is burned for energy production, with water as a by-product (). Currently available precombustion CO2 capture technology using solvents, such as Selexol, methanol, or methyldiethanolamine, is estimated to cost around $60 per metric ton of captured CO2 (), which is 50% higher than the U.S. Department of Energy target. On the other hand, if pressure-swing adsorption (PSA) were used to capture the CO2 from the high-pressure gas mixture obtained from the WGSR (Fig. 1), the cost of CO2 capture could be reduced if a selective adsorbent material with a high CO2 working capacity were available. Increasing the CO2 working capacity means that, for instance, less adsorbent material is needed for the PSA unit, which in turn reduces the cost of CO2 capture.
Fig. 1

Simplified schematic of precombustion CO2 capture.

Schematic was adapted from Wilcox’s study (). Natural gas, which is mainly methane, is reformed to produce a mixture of CO and H2, which then goes through a WGSR to produce a mixture of CO2 and H2. The stream from the WGSR goes through a CO2 separation unit to produce high-purity hydrogen, which is combusted to generate electricity.

Simplified schematic of precombustion CO2 capture.

Schematic was adapted from Wilcox’s study (). Natural gas, which is mainly methane, is reformed to produce a mixture of CO and H2, which then goes through a WGSR to produce a mixture of CO2 and H2. The stream from the WGSR goes through a CO2 separation unit to produce high-purity hydrogen, which is combusted to generate electricity. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of nanoporous materials that could potentially provide higher CO2 working capacities for precombustion CO2 capture than traditional sorbents, such as zeolites and activated carbons, because of their high pore volumes and surface areas. MOFs are synthesized by the self-assembly of organic and inorganic building blocks, and different combinations of the building blocks can produce MOFs with different physical and chemical properties, making this class of materials incredibly versatile and tunable for a wide range of applications (–). For instance, MOFs have been investigated for a wide range of gas storage and separation applications (–), but only a limited number of MOFs [for example, Cu-BTTri (, ), Mg-MOF-74 (), and Ni-4PyC ()] have been tested for precombustion CO2 capture. Given the large number of MOFs synthesized to date (), experimental evaluation of all MOFs for this application would be impractical at best, and other approaches must be used to identify promising materials. High-throughput computational screening has emerged in the past few years as a powerful approach to accelerating the evaluation of adsorbent materials for postcombustion CO2 capture (, ), methane storage (–), Xe/Kr separation (, ), H2 storage (), and biofuel and hydrocarbon separations (). In this approach, molecular simulations are carried out to evaluate the performance of existing or not-yet-synthesized adsorbent materials to find top-performing candidates and to reveal key structure-property relationships between material performance and physical characteristics (for example, pore volume and enthalpy of adsorption). In one example, these computational screening efforts led to the synthesis of a new MOF for methane storage (). In other cases, computational screening was used to find the performance limits of MOFs for applications such as methane and hydrogen storage (, ). To date, evaluation of the materials has been relatively fast, and hundreds of thousands of hypothetical materials could be screened because the guest species of interest were small molecules accurately described by classical force fields. However, there are millions of potential MOFs, and for many applications, calculating the performance of each material will be more time-consuming, for example, if quantum mechanical calculations are required (). The current efforts have calculated the properties of all candidate materials in a given set of materials. However, many of these candidates have low performance, and much time is wasted in evaluating the less-promising materials. Therefore, several groups are investigating ways to reduce the time invested in evaluating large numbers of materials (, , –). For example, Simon et al. () trained decision trees to identify promising materials for Xe/Kr separation in a database of more than 600,000 nanoporous materials. Each material was evaluated by the decision trees based on six textural properties and one property based on the energetics of adsorption sites, and only the most promising materials were evaluated using grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations. In another example, Bao et al. () implemented a genetic algorithm (GA) to evolve ditopic linkers using well-known reactions and commercially available organic compounds. The evolved linkers varied greatly in terms of complexity, and provided they fulfilled certain requirements (for example, being relatively linear), they were substituted into their corresponding “parent” MOFs, whose topology and metal node remained unchanged. The MOFchildren” were then evaluated for methane storage using GCMC simulations. Although the abovementioned study solely focused on linker evolution, a strongly appealing aspect of this work is that not every possible linker was evaluated. What is needed is a more efficient way to explore a given database or “space” of materials to find top performers without exhaustively evaluating every material. Here, a GA was developed to find top-performing MOFs for precombustion CO2 capture, and the method was applied to a database of 55,163 hypothetical MOFs (hMOFs) (). One of the top-performing MOFs that emerged from the GA-guided search was synthesized, activated, and tested. Experimental pure-component CO2 and H2 isotherms on the activated MOF showed good agreement with the simulation predictions. Applying the ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) to obtain mixture isotherms from the experimental data, we find that the synthesized MOF has a CO2 working capacity of 3.8 mol/kg and a CO2/H2 selectivity of 60. The selectivity is high enough to obtain 99% H2 purity according to our PSA process simulations, and the working capacity is the highest reported to date for the operating conditions considered here. Using the structure-property relationships obtained from the calculations, we also identified 531 promising MOFs in a database of 5109 existing (already synthesized) MOFs. Molecular simulations were carried out on these structures, and one of the top-performing materials was identified, synthesized, activated, and tested. From the measured isotherms and IAST, the MOF shows a CO2 working capacity of 3.1 mol/kg and a CO2/H2 selectivity of 48.

RESULTS

Validation of the GA

We implemented a GA search strategy as described in Materials and Methods and Fig. 2 (A and B) and applied it to a large database of 51,163 hMOFs (). Before applying the GA to find high-performing hMOFs for precombustion CO2 capture, we tested the efficiency and robustness of our GA implementation by trying to find the hMOFs with the highest gravimetric and volumetric surface areas and methane working capacity. Note that these properties were previously calculated for all hMOFs; thus, we already knew the identity of the best materials for these test cases. Figure 2 (C to E) shows the histograms of methane working capacities and gravimetric and volumetric surface areas, respectively, for all hMOFs and for the initial population of 100 hMOFs used in all GA runs. These properties were used as different measures of hMOF “fitness” that the GA should attempt to improve. For each fitness measure, 100 independent GA runs were carried out for 100 generations each. The histograms of the performance of the best hMOF at the end of each GA run are shown in Fig. 2 (F to H). For each of the three performance measures, the GA always found a structure within the top 4% by the 10th generation.
Fig. 2

Overview and validation of the GA.

(A) An example chromosome and the corresponding hMOF structure. Colors help illustrate the correspondence between the genes and the hMOF structural features. (B) Workflow of GA. (C to E) Histograms for all hMOFs (gray) and for the initial population used in the GA runs (green). (C) Methane working capacity. (D) Gravimetric surface area. (E) Volumetric surface area. (F to H) Histograms collected from 100 GA runs show the fitness of the top-performing MOF at the end of each run. (F) Methane working capacity. (G) Gravimetric surface area. (H) Volumetric surface area. The vertical lines in (F) to (H) correspond to the fitness of the top performer from the initial population (black) and from the whole database (red).

Overview and validation of the GA.

(A) An example chromosome and the corresponding hMOF structure. Colors help illustrate the correspondence between the genes and the hMOF structural features. (B) Workflow of GA. (C to E) Histograms for all hMOFs (gray) and for the initial population used in the GA runs (green). (C) Methane working capacity. (D) Gravimetric surface area. (E) Volumetric surface area. (F to H) Histograms collected from 100 GA runs show the fitness of the top-performing MOF at the end of each run. (F) Methane working capacity. (G) Gravimetric surface area. (H) Volumetric surface area. The vertical lines in (F) to (H) correspond to the fitness of the top performer from the initial population (black) and from the whole database (red).

Application of the GA

Starting with the same initial hMOF population that was used for the validation of the GA, the algorithm was applied to search for top hMOFs for precombustion CO2 capture. We note that, inherent to the GA formalism, it is not possible to determine whether the best hMOF in the database is identified through the GA search. However, as an objective measure of the success of our GA approach, we sought to identify MOFs with better performance metrics than those reported for MOFs to date. Three independent GA runs were performed to separately optimize three different fitness measures, namely, the CO2 working capacity (ΔN1), the CO2/H2 selectivity (), and an adsorbent performance score (APS), which is the product of the former two quantities, as defined in Materials and Methods. Each GA was run for 10 generations, and GCMC simulations were carried out for each new hMOF considered. To improve the computational efficiency, the GCMC results were saved, and if an hMOF in the nth generation was already evaluated in a previous generation (from any of the three runs), no new GCMC simulations were carried out for that structure. Details of the GA runs are provided in section S3. Figure 3 summarizes the progress of the GA as it searched for top-performing hMOFs for each fitness measure. For each generation, the average fitness of the population and the fitness of the best-performing hMOF from the population (the elite) are plotted. As the GA evolved, for the top-performing MOF from each generation, the CO2 working capacity improved from ca. 7 mol/kg (1st generation) to ca. 8 mol/kg (10th generation), the CO2/H2 selectivity improved from ca. 700 to ca. 2600, and the APS improved from ca. 1000 mol/kg to ca. 1200 mol/kg.
Fig. 3

Performance of the GA.

(A to C) Results for three independent GA runs dedicated to optimize (A) CO2 working capacity, (B) CO2/H2 selectivity, and (C) APS.

Performance of the GA.

(A to C) Results for three independent GA runs dedicated to optimize (A) CO2 working capacity, (B) CO2/H2 selectivity, and (C) APS. The progression of genes during the GA run to optimize the APS is shown in Fig. 4. This figure shows that the building blocks that consistently result in top-performing hMOFs become dominant as the GA progresses. As the new generations of hMOFs are evolved, zinc paddlewheel nodes (gene “1” from Fig. 4A) and [1,1′:4′,1′′]terphenyl-3,3′,5,5′′-tetracarboxylic (TPTC) acid linkers (gene “38” from Fig. 4, B and C) become dominant. On the other hand, no specific functional group becomes dominant, which suggests that the choice of organic linkers and inorganic building blocks plays a more important role in optimizing the APS of MOFs for this application.
Fig. 4

Gene evolution during GA optimization of APS.

(A to D) Genes corresponding to (A) inorganic building blocks, (B) primary organic linkers, (C) secondary organic linkers, and (D) functional groups.

Gene evolution during GA optimization of APS.

(A to D) Genes corresponding to (A) inorganic building blocks, (B) primary organic linkers, (C) secondary organic linkers, and (D) functional groups. Table 1 shows that the number of GCMC simulations carried out during each GA run is significantly smaller than what would be required for an exhaustive search of all hMOFs. Each GA run required less than 1% of the computational time compared to a brute force search. Only 730 of 51,163 hMOFs were evaluated even if the three GA runs, together, were considered. Note that the GA is not guaranteed to find the very best solution (here, the best hMOF from the entire database). However, the GA validation tests illustrated in Fig. 2 (C to H) suggest that the top-performing hMOFs that were identified should be within the top 4% for each fitness measure (see section S3.)
Table 1

Comparison of computational effort for brute force search versus GA.

ΔN1 is the CO2 working capacity, is the CO2/H2 selectivity, and APS is the adsorbent performance score, as defined in Eqs. 1 to 3. The number of GCMC simulations for the GA search corresponds to the number of simulations carried out up to 10 generations.

MethodFitnessmeasureNumber of GCMCsimulationsRelative computationaltime (%)
Bruteforce51,163100
GAΔN13400.66
α12ads3220.63
APS2680.52

Comparison of computational effort for brute force search versus GA.

ΔN1 is the CO2 working capacity, is the CO2/H2 selectivity, and APS is the adsorbent performance score, as defined in Eqs. 1 to 3. The number of GCMC simulations for the GA search corresponds to the number of simulations carried out up to 10 generations.

Identification and synthesis of the top-performing MOFs

The three GA runs produced data for the CO2 working capacity, the CO2/H2 selectivity, and the APS of 730 genetically unique hMOFs. Figure 5 summarizes the data obtained from all GA runs, where CO2/H2 selectivity is plotted as a function of CO2 working capacity, with the color of the data points indicating the APS value. The top-performing hMOFs based on the CO2 working capacity have void fractions between 0.6 and 0.8 and pore diameters between 8 and 10 Å. The MOFs with the highest CO2/H2 selectivity have lower void fractions (<0.5) and smaller pore diameters (<5 Å), and consequently, they have a low CO2 working capacity because the pore space is filled before the pressure reaches 20 bar. Figure 5 shows that there is a clear trade-off between CO2 working capacity and CO2/H2 selectivity.
Fig. 5

Aggregated data from the GA search (circles) for precombustion CO2 capture.

Each point corresponds to an hMOF and is colored according to the value of the APS. The data point for the synthesis target identified from the GA search (NOTT-101/OEt) obtained from GCMC simulations is shown in gray. Data points for MOFs experimentally tested in the literature for the operating conditions studied here are shown in black-outlined yellow squares. The properties of Cu-BTTri and MOF-74 were computed on the basis of the mixture isotherms obtained from IAST reported by Herm et al. () and Herm et al. (), respectively (see section S10). The properties of Ni-4PyC were approximated from simulated and experimental data reported by Nandi et al. (). Exp., experimental; sim., simulated.

Aggregated data from the GA search (circles) for precombustion CO2 capture.

Each point corresponds to an hMOF and is colored according to the value of the APS. The data point for the synthesis target identified from the GA search (NOTT-101/OEt) obtained from GCMC simulations is shown in gray. Data points for MOFs experimentally tested in the literature for the operating conditions studied here are shown in black-outlined yellow squares. The properties of Cu-BTTri and MOF-74 were computed on the basis of the mixture isotherms obtained from IAST reported by Herm et al. () and Herm et al. (), respectively (see section S10). The properties of Ni-4PyC were approximated from simulated and experimental data reported by Nandi et al. (). Exp., experimental; sim., simulated. The APS aims to account for the effect of both the selectivity and the working capacity of the adsorbent on the purity and recovery of the PSA process. hMOFs with high APS values were considered for possible synthesis. In particular, we focused on hMOFs that were both located near the Pareto front in Fig. 5 and had better working capacities than the experimentally tested MOFs also shown in Fig. 5. In this way, we obtained a “preliminary” list of nearly 50 high-performing hMOFs. From this list, we identified 12 MOFs based on the nbo topology, which combines metal paddlewheels and planar tetracarboxylate organic linkers, as materials that we anticipated we could successfully synthesize, on the basis of our previous experience in MOF synthesis. These 12 MOFs correspond to 6 zinc-based MOFs and their 6 copper-based counterparts. Before synthesis, the adsorption properties of these 12 hMOFs were recomputed using density functional theory (DFT)–derived partial atomic charges () for the hMOF atoms [approximate charges () were used for the GA screening]. We also arranged the functional groups in each of these hMOFs so that they were uniformly placed on each constituent organic linker in the material (section S5). From these simulations, we identified the TPTC acid linker [one of the linkers (gene 38) that was dominant in Fig. 4] functionalized with two ethoxy groups to optimize the APS value for both the copper- and zinc-based hMOFs (table S3). For both the copper- and zinc-based hMOFs having this linker, we predicted high working capacities (5.7 mol/kg) and high selectivities (132 and 188 for copper and zinc cases, respectively). Because of the anticipated higher stability of copper paddlewheels upon activation, we selected the copper hMOF as the synthesis target. The selected hMOF is a functionalized version of a previously synthesized MOF, NOTT-101 (), and our simulations predict it to have a CO2 working capacity that is higher than that reported for the few materials previously experimentally tested for precombustion CO2 capture (see Fig. 5). The ethoxy-functionalized version of NOTT-101 (NOTT-101/OEt) was synthesized and activated. It should be noted that, unbeknown to us at the time of synthesis, NOTT-101/OEt had already been synthesized in 2013 (). However, to the best of our knowledge, the properties of NOTT-101/OEt for precombustion CO2 capture had not been examined until now. Important for performance, the synthesis and activation protocol we used in this study improves the experimental apparent Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) area of the MOF from the previously reported 1293 to 1900 m2/g, which is in much closer agreement with the simulated BET area for the perfect crystal (2008 m2/g) and thus indicates a high-quality sample. These experimental and simulated BET areas were obtained from experimental and simulated N2 isotherms, applying the four BET consistency criteria (). The saturation loadings from the N2 isotherms were used to determine the experimental (0.743 cm3/g) and simulated (0.797 cm3/g) MOF pore volumes, indicating a 92% activation of the MOF pores. The CO2 and H2 adsorption isotherms of NOTT-101/OEt were measured experimentally up to 16 bar at 313 K. Figure 6C shows the comparison between the experimental and simulated absolute adsorption isotherms for NOTT-101/OEt. In the figure, the experimental isotherms were multiplied by a factor of 1.09 to account for the 92% pore activation. There is good agreement between measured and simulated H2 isotherms, with only a slight (in absolute terms) underestimation by the simulation. There is fair agreement between measured and simulated CO2 isotherms, with simulations somewhat overpredicting the CO2 uptake, especially at the intermediate pressure range. Note that actual measured data instead of scaled-up data are presented and discussed in subsequent sections.
Fig. 6

MOF studied for precombustion CO2 capture.

(A) Inorganic node and organic ligand used to synthesize NOTT-101/OEt. (B) Atomistic representation of NOTT-101/OEt. Copper, carbon, and oxygen atoms are shown in orange, black, and red, respectively. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Purple spheres represent the cavities of NOTT-101/OEt. (C) Experimental and simulated absolute single-component CO2 and H2 isotherms for NOTT-101/OEt at 313 K. (D) Crystal structures of other MOFs listed in Table 2. Mg-MOF-74, Cu-BTTri, Ni-4PyC, and VEXTUO are based on Mg2, Cu4Cl, Ni2O, and Ni2O inorganic nodes, respectively, connected by the linkers illustrated below each MOF. MOF pore cages are illustrated with colored spheres. (The MOFs are not all drawn to the same scale.)

MOF studied for precombustion CO2 capture.

(A) Inorganic node and organic ligand used to synthesize NOTT-101/OEt. (B) Atomistic representation of NOTT-101/OEt. Copper, carbon, and oxygen atoms are shown in orange, black, and red, respectively. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Purple spheres represent the cavities of NOTT-101/OEt. (C) Experimental and simulated absolute single-component CO2 and H2 isotherms for NOTT-101/OEt at 313 K. (D) Crystal structures of other MOFs listed in Table 2. Mg-MOF-74, Cu-BTTri, Ni-4PyC, and VEXTUO are based on Mg2, Cu4Cl, Ni2O, and Ni2O inorganic nodes, respectively, connected by the linkers illustrated below each MOF. MOF pore cages are illustrated with colored spheres. (The MOFs are not all drawn to the same scale.)
Table 2

CO2 working capacity and CO2/H2 selectivity for several MOFs.

MOFCO2 working capacity (mol/kg)CO2/H2selectivityReference
NOTT-101/OEt3.860This work
Cu-BTTri3.720(15)
Ni-4PyC*3.4279(17)
VEXTUO3.148This work
Mg-MOF-742.6365(14)

*Results are approximate and are obtained on the basis of experimental and simulation data reported by Nandi et al. (). Specifically, selectivity was obtained from mixture simulation data at 313 K/20 bar, and working capacity was obtained from mixture simulation data at 313 K/20 bar and pure-component experimental data at 303 K/1 bar.

†Measured at 303 K.

Application of structure-property relationships to find candidates in a separate database

High-throughput computational screening produces large volumes of data that can be used to find underlying structure-property relationships, such as how the performance for a given application depends on the MOF surface area, void fraction, etc. From the GA runs, structure-property relationships also emerged but with significantly fewer computations than with a brute force approach (Table 1). In principle, the structure-property relationships emerging from a GA screening could be used to find additional high-performing MOFs without the need for further simulations. To test the applicability of this approach, we searched for high-performing MOFs in a separate database: the computation-ready, experimental (CoRE) MOF database (). Two key advantages of the 5109 structures in the CoRE MOF database are that all of them have already been synthesized and that their synthesis protocols are available in the literature, which can facilitate the synthesis and testing of any candidates identified from computational screening or other methods. We identified ranges of optimal physical properties (pore-limiting diameter, largest cavity diameter, gravimetric surface area, and helium void fraction) for each performance measure on the basis of the properties of the hMOFs within the top 1% of the 730 hMOFs evaluated during the GA runs (table S4). These properties were then used to identify 75, 99, and 357 candidate CoRE MOFs for high CO2 working capacity, CO2/H2 selectivity, and APS, respectively. For each group of CoRE MOFs, GCMC simulations were carried out to evaluate their adsorption properties, and the results showed that 5 (of 75), 14 (of 99), and 13 (of 357) of these CoRE MOFs have a high working capacity, a high selectivity, and a high APS, respectively (see section S5). Note that although the “hit rate” was low (for example, only 5 of 75 candidates had a high working capacity), these properties were still useful in identifying high-performing CoRE MOFs without having to evaluate the full CoRE MOF database. One of the identified high-performing CoRE MOFs [Cambridge Structural Database REFCODE: VEXTUO ()] with a predicted CO2 working capacity of 6.0 mol/kg and a CO2/H2 selectivity of 83 was selected for synthesis, activation, and testing. Note that although all CoRE MOFs have synthesis protocols available, successful activation is not guaranteed for all of these MOFs (). Therefore, the comparison of reported BET areas and the geometrically calculated surface areas was also a factor in deciding which MOF to synthesize, because marked differences between the two values could indicate a tendency of the MOF to collapse upon activation or difficulty in removing trapped solvents or other impurities. VEXTUO was synthesized following the protocol in the literature (). Experimental and simulated BET areas were 1977 and 2031 m2/g, respectively, and the measured and simulated pore volumes were 0.75 and 0.78 cm3/g, respectively. Single-component isotherms of CO2 and H2 were measured at 303 K. The simulated and experimental H2 isotherms were in good agreement, but the simulated CO2 isotherms were ~35% higher (at 15 bar) than the measured isotherms for VEXTUO (see section S9).

Comparison with other adsorbents

Table 2 summarizes a comparison among the two MOFs from this work and three high-performing MOFs (Mg-MOF-74, Cu-BTTri, and Ni-4PyC) known from the literature (all MOFs in Table 2 are illustrated in Fig. 6D). We used IAST to compute the mixture isotherms from high-pressure (up to 16 to 20 bar) experimental single-component CO2 and H2 isotherms of the MOFs in Table 2 (see section S10). For NOTT-101/OEt and VEXTUO, experimental data were obtained in this work, whereas the experimental isotherms for Mg-MOF-74 and Cu-BTTri were obtained from the literature. Process simulations of an example PSA unit (see section S4) show that CO2/H2 selectivities higher than 30 are enough to achieve 99% H2 purity, and higher working capacities reduce the amount of adsorbent required for the separation. *Results are approximate and are obtained on the basis of experimental and simulation data reported by Nandi et al. (). Specifically, selectivity was obtained from mixture simulation data at 313 K/20 bar, and working capacity was obtained from mixture simulation data at 313 K/20 bar and pure-component experimental data at 303 K/1 bar. †Measured at 303 K. NOTT-101/OEt has the highest CO2 working capacity among the five MOFs and a relatively high CO2/H2 selectivity of 60. Previously, Mg-MOF-74 has been noted for its high CO2 working capacity (). However, there is some question about how to define the working capacity for PSA processes. Here, we introduce a definition of the CO2 working capacity (see Materials and Methods) based on the gas composition profiles from a PSA process simulation () under realistic operating conditions (see section S4). On the basis of this definition, the CO2 working capacity of Mg-MOF-74 is the lowest among the listed MOFs, whereas its CO2/H2 selectivity is the highest. However, because our process modeling shows that selectivities higher than 30 are enough to reach >99% purity, MOFs such as NOTT-101/OEt (with an approximately 62% higher working capacity with respect to Mg-MOF-74) could be better suited for precombustion carbon capture. Similarly, both VEXTUO (which was identified from the CoRE MOF database) and Ni-4PyC (which was reported during the preparation of this manuscript) also have working capacities higher than that of Mg-MOF-74 (ca. 19% and ca. 31%, respectively), while having selectivities higher than 30. Note that our estimation of the Ni-4PyC working capacity is approximate, on the basis of the available experimental and simulation data reported by Nandi et al. (). On the other hand, whereas Cu-BTTri has a high CO2 working capacity (only slightly lower than NOTT-101/OEt), its selectivity is lower than 30.

DISCUSSION

Here, we successfully demonstrated that a GA could be used to efficiently identify top adsorbent materials for precombustion CO2 capture among thousands of hMOFs. The GA reduced the computational time by at least two orders of magnitude relative to a brute force search. One of the top-performing MOFs, NOTT-101/OEt, was synthesized and tested, and the experimental pure-component CO2 and H2 isotherms agree well with the simulation predictions. IAST-predicted mixture isotherms show that the CO2 working capacity of NOTT-101/OEt is 3.8 mol/kg, with a CO2/H2 selectivity of 60. We also showed that the structure-property relationships obtained from the GA-guided search could be used to discover top-performing MOFs in different databases without the need for a large number of additional simulations. The methods demonstrated in this work (both the GA-guided and the structure-property–guided search) could be applied to search for high-performing MOFs for other applications and should be especially useful when the performance evaluation requires a large amount of computational time, such as simulations involving large, complex molecules, or when quantum mechanical calculations are required.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Calculation of adsorption properties

GCMC simulations () were carried out as implemented in the RASPA simulation code (, ) to compute adsorption loadings at 313 K. Details of simulations and models are provided in section S1. Simulations were carried out to compute the CO2 adsorption loadings for pure CO2 at 1 bar and the CO2 and H2 adsorption loadings for a 20:80 CO2/H2 mixture at 20 bar. The following adsorbent evaluation criteria were used to measure the fitness of each MOF Here, ΔN1 is the CO2 working capacity, and are the CO2 and H2 adsorption loadings for the CO2/H2 mixture at 20 bar, and is the CO2 adsorption loading for pure CO2 at 1 bar. Section S4 discusses the reasons for using this definition of the CO2 working capacity, which is different from what is sometimes used. is the CO2/H2 selectivity, and y1 and y2 are the mole fractions of CO2 (0.2) and H2 (0.8) in the gas phase, respectively. We also defined an APS in Eq. 3, similar to the performance measure defined by Bai et al. (), as a way to account for the impact of both the CO2 working capacity and the CO2/H2 selectivity on the performance of a PSA unit.

Database of hMOFs

The hMOFs explored in this work were obtained from the WLLFHS database of hMOFs (). The structure of each MOF in this database can be characterized by a sequence of six integers (a chromosome). Genes 1 to 6 encode the interpenetration capacity, the actual interpenetration level, and the identities of the inorganic node, primary linker, secondary linker, and functional groups of a given hMOF (Fig. 2A). The 137,193 MOFs in the WLLFHS database can be described by 51,163 unique chromosomes due to conformational isomers and structures that differ only in the positioning of the functional groups (see section S2). The simulation of MOFs with identical genes resulted in very similar performance because they have similar structures. Therefore, the original WLLFHS database was reduced to 51,163 MOFs by selecting 1 MOF from each unique chromosome. This reduced database was subsequently explored using the GA developed in this work.

Genetic algorithm

GAs are a class of optimization methods that mimic natural selection. In a typical GA, a population of candidate solutions is evolved in the solution space toward higher values of some fitness function. Here, the solutions were hMOFs, and the GA evolved the genetic information of hMOFs to optimize one of the performance measures defined in Eqs. 1 to 3. We started with an initial population of 100 hMOFs (that is, the first generation) that was selected manually to ensure that each possible gene was carried by at least 1 hMOF. Each generation was evolved to create a subsequent generation. All generations had a population of 100 hMOFs. Elitism was implemented to ensure that the hMOF with the highest fitness in the nth generation appears in the (n + 1)th generation. All other hMOFs in the (n + 1)th generation were obtained by applying genetic operations on hMOF pairs selected from the nth generation. These hMOF pairs were selected using the tournament method (). In a tournament, the hMOF with the higher fitness value between the two randomly selected hMOFs from the nth generation was selected with a 95% probability. Each hMOF pair was obtained from two independent tournament selections, and single-point crossover was subsequently carried out on the selected pair of hMOFs with a 65% probability. Each gene in the new chromosome had a 5% probability to undergo a mutation. Each hMOF pair in the nth generation produced one hMOF for the (n + 1)th generation. Figure 2B summarizes the workflow of the GA, and full details can be found in section S3.
  23 in total

1.  An Extended Charge Equilibration Method.

Authors:  Christopher E Wilmer; Ki Chul Kim; Randall Q Snurr
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 6.475

2.  Twelve-connected porous metal-organic frameworks with high H(2) adsorption.

Authors:  Junhua Jia; Xiang Lin; Claire Wilson; Alexander J Blake; Neil R Champness; Peter Hubberstey; Gavin Walker; Edmund J Cussen; Martin Schröder
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Furukawa; Kyle E Cordova; Michael O'Keeffe; Omar M Yaghi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Reconciling the discrepancies between crystallographic porosity and guest access as exemplified by Zn-HKUST-1.

Authors:  Jeremy I Feldblyum; Ming Liu; David W Gidley; Adam J Matzger
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 5.  Porous materials. Function-led design of new porous materials.

Authors:  Anna G Slater; Andrew I Cooper
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Discovery of optimal zeolites for challenging separations and chemical transformations using predictive materials modeling.

Authors:  Peng Bai; Mi Young Jeon; Limin Ren; Chris Knight; Michael W Deem; Michael Tsapatsis; J Ilja Siepmann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Development and evaluation of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture.

Authors:  Youn-Sang Bae; Randall Q Snurr
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Metal-organic frameworks as adsorbents for hydrogen purification and precombustion carbon dioxide capture.

Authors:  Zoey R Herm; Joseph A Swisher; Berend Smit; Rajamani Krishna; Jeffrey R Long
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Simultaneously high gravimetric and volumetric methane uptake characteristics of the metal-organic framework NU-111.

Authors:  Yang Peng; Gadipelli Srinivas; Christopher E Wilmer; Ibrahim Eryazici; Randall Q Snurr; Joseph T Hupp; Taner Yildirim; Omar K Farha
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  High capacity hydrogen adsorption in Cu(II) tetracarboxylate framework materials: the role of pore size, ligand functionalization, and exposed metal sites.

Authors:  Xiang Lin; Irvin Telepeni; Alexander J Blake; Anne Dailly; Craig M Brown; Jason M Simmons; Marco Zoppi; Gavin S Walker; K Mark Thomas; Timothy J Mays; Peter Hubberstey; Neil R Champness; Martin Schröder
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  14 in total

1.  The path towards sustainable energy.

Authors:  Steven Chu; Yi Cui; Nian Liu
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 43.841

2.  The role of molecular modelling and simulation in the discovery and deployment of metal-organic frameworks for gas storage and separation.

Authors:  Arni Sturluson; Melanie T Huynh; Alec R Kaija; Caleb Laird; Sunghyun Yoon; Feier Hou; Zhenxing Feng; Christopher E Wilmer; Yamil J Colón; Yongchul G Chung; Daniel W Siderius; Cory M Simon
Journal:  Mol Simul       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.178

3.  Multi-Level Computational Screening of in Silico Designed MOFs for Efficient SO2 Capture.

Authors:  Hakan Demir; Seda Keskin
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 4.  From computational high-throughput screenings to the lab: taking metal-organic frameworks out of the computer.

Authors:  Aurelia Li; Rocio Bueno-Perez; David Madden; David Fairen-Jimenez
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 9.969

Review 5.  Machine Learning Meets with Metal Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage and Separation.

Authors:  Cigdem Altintas; Omer Faruk Altundal; Seda Keskin; Ramazan Yildirim
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  High-Throughput Computational Screening of the Metal Organic Framework Database for CH4/H2 Separations.

Authors:  Cigdem Altintas; Ilknur Erucar; Seda Keskin
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 9.229

7.  Computational Screening of MOFs for Acetylene Separation.

Authors:  Ayda Nemati Vesali Azar; Seda Keskin
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 5.221

8.  Materials genomics methods for high-throughput construction of COFs and targeted synthesis.

Authors:  Youshi Lan; Xianghao Han; Minman Tong; Hongliang Huang; Qingyuan Yang; Dahuan Liu; Xin Zhao; Chongli Zhong
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  High-Throughput Screening of MOF Adsorbents and Membranes for H2 Purification and CO2 Capture.

Authors:  Gokay Avci; Sadiye Velioglu; Seda Keskin
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 9.229

10.  Performance-Based Screening of Porous Materials for Carbon Capture.

Authors:  Amir H Farmahini; Shreenath Krishnamurthy; Daniel Friedrich; Stefano Brandani; Lev Sarkisov
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.