Literature DB >> 2775612

The effect of pregnancy in humans on the pharmacokinetics of stable isotope labelled phenytoin.

R G Dickinson1, W D Hooper, B Wood, C M Lander, M J Eadie.   

Abstract

1. To investigate the mechanism of the fall in steady-state plasma phenytoin concentration relative to drug dose that occurs during pregnancy, single dose pharmacokinetic studies with stable isotope labelled phenytoin were carried out at different stages of pregnancy, and 2 to 4 months post-natally, in five epileptic women receiving regular oral therapy with the drug. 2. Steady-state apparent plasma clearances of phenytoin (dose/steady-state concentration) correlated closely with simultaneous plasma clearances of the intravenous stable-isotope drug (measured as dose/AUC) suggesting that the patients were complaint with therapy when their phenytoin dosage requirement increased during the pregnancy, and that the oral drug was fully bioavailable. 3. In retrospect, two of the five subjects were probably studied too early post-natally for phenytoin elimination kinetics to have returned to non-pregnant values. Despite this, (i) the mean +/- s.d. t 1/2 for phenytoin was statistically significantly shorter in pregnancy than post-natally (31 +/- 14 vs 39 +/- 28 h), (ii) the mean +/- s.d. whole plasma clearance was also statistically significant greater (0.025 +/- 0.012 vs 0.021 +/- 0.013 kg-1 h-1) and (iii) the mean +/- s.d. Vmax for phenytoin elimination was statistically significantly greater in pregnancy (1170 +/- 600 mg day-1) than post-natally (780 +/- 470 mg day-1). Although the mean +/- s.d. apparent Km was higher in pregnancy (18.2 +/- 8.4 mg l-1, expressed in terms of whole plasma drug concentrations, compared with 10.2 +/- 7.4 mg l-1 post-natally), the difference was not statistically significant. However, if the apparent Km value was expressed in terms of plasma water phenytoin concentrations the difference (pregnant 2.50 +/- 0.85 mg l-1: post-natally 1.16 +/- 0.65 mg l-1) was statistically significant. 4. Human pregnancy appears to result in an increased capacity to eliminate phenytoin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2775612      PMCID: PMC1379966          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1989.tb03501.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  23 in total

1.  Drug estimation in the treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  A Richens
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1974-12

2.  Plasma drug level monitoring in pregnancy.

Authors:  M J Eadie; C M Lander; J H Tyrer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Metabolic disposition of diphenylhydantoin in normal human subjects following intravenous administration.

Authors:  A J Glazko; T Chang; J Baukema; W A Dill; J R Goulet; R A Buchanan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1969 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Phenytoin and phenobarbitone plasma clearance during pregnancy.

Authors:  K I Mygind; M Dam; J Christiansen
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 3.209

5.  The effect of certain drugs on the plasma protein binding of phenytoin.

Authors:  W D Hooper; J M Sutherland; F Bochner; J H Tyrer; M J Eadie
Journal:  Aust N Z J Med       Date:  1973-08

6.  The clinical pharmacokinetics of phenytoin.

Authors:  E Martin; T N Tozer; L B Sheiner; S Riegelman
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1977-12

7.  Epilepsy and pregnancy: a study of 153 pregnancies in 59 patients.

Authors:  A H Knight; E G Rhind
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  Disposition of phenytoin and phenobarbitone in the isolated perfused human placenta.

Authors:  R M Kluck; G R Cannell; W D Hooper; M J Eadie; R G Dickinson
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.557

9.  Status epilepticus in pregnancy: effect of phenytoin malabsorption on seizure control.

Authors:  R E Ramsay; R G Strauss; B J Wilder; L J Willmore
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Plasma anticonvulsant concentrations during pregnancy.

Authors:  C M Lander; V E Edwards; M J Eadie; J H Tyrer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Joining the DoTS: new approach to classifying adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  J K Aronson; R E Ferner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-22

2.  Anatomical, physiological and metabolic changes with gestational age during normal pregnancy: a database for parameters required in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling.

Authors:  Khaled Abduljalil; Penny Furness; Trevor N Johnson; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Hora Soltani
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Changes in maternal liver Cyp2c and Cyp2d expression and activity during rat pregnancy.

Authors:  Leslie J Dickmann; Suzanne Tay; Tauri D Senn; Huixia Zhang; Anthony Visone; Jashvant D Unadkat; Mary F Hebert; Nina Isoherranen
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 5.858

4.  Sources of Interindividual Variability.

Authors:  Yvonne S Lin; Kenneth E Thummel; Brice D Thompson; Rheem A Totah; Christi W Cho
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  Drug metabolism and transport during pregnancy: how does drug disposition change during pregnancy and what are the mechanisms that cause such changes?

Authors:  Nina Isoherranen; Kenneth E Thummel
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 6.  Treatment of epilepsy in women of reproductive age: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  James W McAuley; Gail D Anderson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy: what is known and which AEDs seem to be safest?

Authors:  Page B Pennell
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  Phenytoin metabolism during pregnancy.

Authors:  M J Eadie; G E McKinnon; R G Dickinson; W D Hooper; C M Lander
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Models for placental transfer studies of drugs.

Authors:  P Bourget; C Roulot; H Fernandez
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.447

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.