Literature DB >> 27755698

A framework for inferring biological communities from environmental DNA.

Andrew Olaf Shelton1, James Lawrence O'Donnell2, Jameal F Samhouri3, Natalie Lowell2, Gregory D Williams4, Ryan P Kelly2.   

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA), genetic material recovered from an environmental medium such as soil, water, or feces, reflects the membership of the ecological community present in the sampled environment. As such, eDNA is a potentially rich source of data for basic ecology, conservation, and management, because it offers the prospect of quantitatively reconstructing whole ecological communities from easily obtained samples. However, like all sampling methods, eDNA sequencing is subject to methodological limitations that can generate biased descriptions of ecological communities. Here, we demonstrate parallels between eDNA sampling and traditional sampling techniques, and use these parallels to offer a statistical structure for framing the challenges faced by eDNA and for illuminating the gaps in our current knowledge. Although the current state of knowledge on some of these steps precludes a full estimate of biomass for each taxon in a sampled eDNA community, we provide a map that illustrates potential methods for bridging these gaps. Additionally, we use an original data set to estimate the relative abundances of taxon-specific template DNA prior to PCR, given the abundance of DNA sequences recovered post-PCR-and-sequencing, a critical step in the chain of eDNA inference. While we focus on the use of eDNA samples to determine the relative abundance of taxa within a community, our approach also applies to single-taxon applications (including applications using qPCR), studies of diversity, and studies focused on occurrence. By grounding inferences about eDNA community composition in a rigorous statistical framework, and by making these inferences explicit, we hope to improve the inferential potential for the emerging field of community-level eDNA analysis.
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian statistics; community surveys; ecosystem assessment; environmental DNA; multinomial-Poisson transformation; quantitative PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27755698     DOI: 10.1890/15-1733.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  14 in total

1.  Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples Correlate with Trawl Catches of Subarctic, Deepwater Fishes.

Authors:  Philip Francis Thomsen; Peter Rask Møller; Eva Egelyng Sigsgaard; Steen Wilhelm Knudsen; Ole Ankjær Jørgensen; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Persistence of marine fish environmental DNA and the influence of sunlight.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Andruszkiewicz; Lauren M Sassoubre; Alexandria B Boehm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Biomonitoring of marine vertebrates in Monterey Bay using eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Andruszkiewicz; Hilary A Starks; Francisco P Chavez; Lauren M Sassoubre; Barbara A Block; Alexandria B Boehm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Spatial distribution of environmental DNA in a nearshore marine habitat.

Authors:  James L O'Donnell; Ryan P Kelly; Andrew Olaf Shelton; Jameal F Samhouri; Natalie C Lowell; Gregory D Williams
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Random sampling causes the low reproducibility of rare eukaryotic OTUs in Illumina COI metabarcoding.

Authors:  Matthieu Leray; Nancy Knowlton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Effects of sampling effort on biodiversity patterns estimated from environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys.

Authors:  Erin K Grey; Louis Bernatchez; Phillip Cassey; Kristy Deiner; Marty Deveney; Kimberly L Howland; Anaïs Lacoursière-Roussel; Sandric Chee Yew Leong; Yiyuan Li; Brett Olds; Michael E Pfrender; Thomas A A Prowse; Mark A Renshaw; David M Lodge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  High-throughput environmental DNA analysis informs a biological assessment of an urban stream.

Authors:  Mark Bagley; Erik Pilgrim; Martin Knapp; Chris Yoder; Jorge Santo Domingo; Aabir Banerji
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.958

8.  Biodiversity assessment of tropical shelf eukaryotic communities via pelagic eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Judith Bakker; Owen S Wangensteen; Charles Baillie; Dayne Buddo; Demian D Chapman; Austin J Gallagher; Tristan L Guttridge; Heidi Hertler; Stefano Mariani
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Environmental DNA filtration techniques affect recovered biodiversity.

Authors:  Markus Majaneva; Ola H Diserud; Shannon H C Eagle; Erik Boström; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Torbjørn Ekrem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation.

Authors:  Didier Pont; Mathieu Rocle; Alice Valentini; Raphaël Civade; Pauline Jean; Anthony Maire; Nicolas Roset; Michael Schabuss; Horst Zornig; Tony Dejean
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.