Literature DB >> 27755694

Projected wetland densities under climate change: habitat loss but little geographic shift in conservation strategy.

Helen R Sofaer1,2, Susan K Skagen3, Joseph J Barsugli4, Benjamin S Rashford5, Gordon C Reese3, Jennifer A Hoeting6, Andrew W Wood7, Barry R Noon8.   

Abstract

Climate change poses major challenges for conservation and management because it alters the area, quality, and spatial distribution of habitat for natural populations. To assess species' vulnerability to climate change and target ongoing conservation investments, researchers and managers often consider the effects of projected changes in climate and land use on future habitat availability and quality and the uncertainty associated with these projections. Here, we draw on tools from hydrology and climate science to project the impact of climate change on the density of wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of the USA, a critical area for breeding waterfowl and other wetland-dependent species. We evaluate the potential for a trade-off in the value of conservation investments under current and future climatic conditions and consider the joint effects of climate and land use. We use an integrated set of hydrological and climatological projections that provide physically based measures of water balance under historical and projected future climatic conditions. In addition, we use historical projections derived from ten general circulation models (GCMs) as a baseline from which to assess climate change impacts, rather than historical climate data. This method isolates the impact of greenhouse gas emissions and ensures that modeling errors are incorporated into the baseline rather than attributed to climate change. Our work shows that, on average, densities of wetlands (here defined as wetland basins holding water) are projected to decline across the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region, but that GCMs differ in both the magnitude and the direction of projected impacts. However, we found little evidence for a shift in the locations expected to provide the highest wetland densities under current vs. projected climatic conditions. This result was robust to the inclusion of projected changes in land use under climate change. We suggest that targeting conservation towards wetland complexes containing both small and relatively large wetland basins, which is an ongoing conservation strategy, may also act to hedge against uncertainty in the effects of climate change.
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.

Keywords:  Prairie Pothole Region; climate change impacts; conservation planning; hydrological projection; vulnerability assessment; waterfowl

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27755694     DOI: 10.1890/15-0750.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  6 in total

1.  Performance assessment of artificial neural networks and support vector regression models for stream flow predictions.

Authors:  Abdul Razzaq Ghumman; Sajjad Ahmad; Hashim Nisar Hashmi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Estimating restorable wetland water storage at landscape scales.

Authors:  Charles Nathan Jones; Grey R Evenson; Daniel L McLaughlin; Melanie K Vanderhoof; Megan W Lang; Greg W McCarty; Heather E Golden; Charles R Lane; Laurie C Alexander
Journal:  Hydrol Process       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.565

3.  Depressional wetlands affect watershed hydrological, biogeochemical, and ecological functions.

Authors:  Grey R Evenson; Heather E Golden; Charles R Lane; Daniel L McLaughlin; Ellen D'Amico
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 6.105

4.  Modeling nonbreeding distributions of shorebirds and waterfowl in response to climate change.

Authors:  Gordon C Reese; Susan K Skagen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Projecting species' vulnerability to climate change: Which uncertainty sources matter most and extrapolate best?

Authors:  Valerie Steen; Helen R Sofaer; Susan K Skagen; Andrea J Ray; Barry R Noon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Limited shifts in the distribution of migratory bird breeding habitat density in response to future changes in climate.

Authors:  Owen P McKenna; David M Mushet; Samuel R Kucia; Elyssa C McCulloch-Huseby
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 6.105

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.