Literature DB >> 27755410

The Rate of Epistaxis Incidence in New-Generation Anticoagulants and Perioperative Approach in Otorhinolaryngological Practices.

Ozan Gökdoğan1, Ilker Akyildiz, Begum Yetis Sayin, Sercan Okutucu, Ali Cevat Tanalp, Necmi Arslan.   

Abstract

Nose bleeding is a common situation seen in otorhinolaryngological practices. One of the greatest risk factors in nose bleeding is the use of anticoagulant medicine. With the medicine developed in recent years, the risk of nose bleeding due to the frequent use of anticoagulant and antiagregant is gradually increasing.The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of especially new-generation anticoagulants on nose bleeding. In addition, the use and complications of new-generation anticoagulants and antiagregants have been compiled in light of information obtained from the literature.Three hundred forty patients whose follow-up is conducted by the cardiology department and who use oral antithrombocytic medicine have been included in the study. It has been determined that 15% of these patients use new-generation oral anticoagulants (Rivaroksaban, apiksaban, dabigatran, danaparoid) and the other patients are treated with conventional antithrombocytic treatment (Aspirin, Warfarin, Enoksaparin sodium). The rate of nose bleeding in patients who use classical anticoagulants has been observed to be 28%. In 30 of these patients who had nose bleeding, while cauterization and buffering by otorhinolaryngology specialists, major intervention has not been necessary for any of the patients. While bleeding has been observed in 26% of the patients who use new-generation anticoagulants, bleeding that required operational intervention has taken place in 2 patients. Bleedings have been stopped surgically through a large number of cauterization and buffering.While the new-generation anticoagulants cause lower rate of bleeding, it has been observed that controlling these bleedings is more difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27755410     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  2 in total

Review 1.  Aetiological profile and treatment outcomes of epistaxis at a major teaching hospital: a review of 721 cases.

Authors:  Brian Carey; Patrick Sheahan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Current Approaches to Epistaxis Treatment in Primary and Secondary Care.

Authors:  Rafael Beck; Martin Sorge; Antonius Schneider; Andreas Dietz
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 5.594

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.