Literature DB >> 27753046

Effects of gender, rape-supportive attitudes, and explicit instruction on perceptions of women's momentary sexual interest.

Teresa A Treat1, Erin K Church2, Richard J Viken3.   

Abstract

Contemporary models of male-initiated sexual aggression toward female acquaintances implicate misperception of women's sexual interest. This study investigated the effects of gender, rape-supportive attitudes and an instructional manipulation on college students' sexual-interest judgments. Two hundred seventy-six women and 220 men judged the cues of momentary sexual interest expressed by photographed women; half received instruction on the differential validity of nonverbal cues of sexual interest for estimation of women's momentary sexual interest. Participants also completed an assessment of rape-supportive attitudes. Overall, college students' perceptions of women's momentary sexual interest are compromised both nomothetically and idiographically. Both male and female college students relied not only on women's nonverbal affect but also on the provocativeness of women's clothing and attractiveness when judging women's sexual interest. Men and women showed similar average ratings, but women relied more than men on women's affect, whereas men relied more than women on women's attractiveness. Both male and female students who endorsed more rape-supportive attitudes, relative to their peers, relied less on women's affect and more on women's clothing style and attractiveness. Explicit instruction regarding the greater validity of women's affective than nonaffective cues enhanced focus on nonverbal affective cues and decreased focus on clothing style and attractiveness. Although higher rape-supportive attitudes predicted more deficits in processing cues of sexual interest, explicit instruction proved to be effective for both higher-risk and lower-risk participants. These findings highlight the generalizability of the well-established effects of explicit instruction on category learning to sexual perception and may point to procedures that eventually could be incorporated into augmented prevention programs for sexual aggression on college campuses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive training; Cue utilization; Sexual perception; Social cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27753046      PMCID: PMC5393949          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1176-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Risk factors for sexual aggression in young men: an expansion of the confluence model.

Authors:  Antonia Abbey; Angela J Jacques-Tiura; James M LeBreton
Journal:  Aggress Behav       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.917

2.  The misperception of sexual interest.

Authors:  Carin Perilloux; Judith A Easton; David M Buss
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-01-18

3.  The evocative power of words: activation of concepts by verbal and nonverbal means.

Authors:  Gary Lupyan; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-09-19

4.  A prospective mediational model of sexual aggression among college men.

Authors:  Martie P Thompson; Mary P Koss; J B Kingree; Jennifer Goree; John Rice
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2010-11-30

5.  Motivated social categorization: fundamental motives enhance people's sensitivity to basic social categories.

Authors:  Jon K Maner; Saul L Miller; Justin H Moss; Jennifer L Leo; E Ashby Plant
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-04-30

6.  Cognitive processes underlying women's risk judgments: associations with sexual victimization history and rape myth acceptance.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Yeater; Teresa A Treat; Richard J Viken; Richard M McFall
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2010-06

7.  Characteristics of aggressors against women: testing a model using a national sample of college students.

Authors:  N M Malamuth; R J Sockloskie; M P Koss; J S Tanaka
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1991-10

Review 8.  Determinants of linear judgment: a meta-analysis of lens model studies.

Authors:  Natalia Karelaia; Robin M Hogarth
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 9.  Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent.

Authors:  Coreen Farris; Teresa A Treat; Richard J Viken; Richard M McFall
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-03-15

10.  Perceptual mechanisms that characterize gender differences in decoding women's sexual intent.

Authors:  Coreen Farris; Teresa A Treat; Richard J Viken; Richard M McFall
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Sexual-perception processes in acquaintance-targeted sexual aggression.

Authors:  Teresa A Treat; Richard J Viken
Journal:  Aggress Behav       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.917

2.  Social Cognitive Processes Underlying Normative Misperception of Sexual Judgments.

Authors:  Caroline C Boyd-Rogers; Teresa A Treat; William R Corbin; Richard J Viken
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-07-21

3.  Men's perceptions of women's sexual interest: Effects of environmental context, sexual attitudes, and women's characteristics.

Authors:  Teresa A Treat; Hannah Hinkel; Jodi R Smith; Richard J Viken
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-09-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.