Literature DB >> 27752848

Internal mammary node adenopathy on breast MRI and PET/CT for initial staging in patients with operable breast cancer: prevalence and associated factors.

Hyejin Cheon1, Hye Jung Kim1, Sang-Woo Lee2, Do-Hoon Kim2, Chang-Hee Lee2, Seung Hyun Cho1, Kyung Min Shin1, So Mi Lee1, Gab Chul Kim1, Won Hwa Kim3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of and factors associated with internal mammary node (IMN) adenopathy on MRI and PET/CT used for initial staging in patients with operable breast cancer.
METHODS: A total of 1320 patients diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma between January 2011 and December 2015 underwent MRI and PET/CT for initial staging. The patients were considered to have IMN adenopathy when MRI revealed IMNs with the longest diameter of 5 mm or greater and a standardized uptake value greater than that of the mediastinal blood pool/contralateral parasternal area on PET/CT. The prevalence was determined as overall percentage of patients with IMN adenopathy, as well as percentages among patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not. The association of IMN adenopathy with factors was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 1320 patients, 35 patients [2.7 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.8-3.6 %] had IMN adenopathy, with a total of 49 IMNs. Among patients without and with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 1092 and n = 228, respectively), IMN adenopathy was identified in 13 (1.2 %; 95 % CI 0.6-2.0 %) and 22 patients (9.6 %; 95 % CI 6.0-14.6 %), respectively. Inner tumor location [odds ratio (OR) 5.9; P = .002] and positive axillary lymph node status (OR 4.4; P < .0001) were associated with IMN adenopathy.
CONCLUSIONS: IMN adenopathy was identified at initial staging with PET/CT and MRI with a prevalence of 2.7 %. Inner tumor location and positive axillary lymph node status were associated with IMN adenopathy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast MRI; IMN adenopathy; Internal mammary node; Invasive breast cancer; PET–CT

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27752848     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4022-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  6 in total

Review 1.  Internal mammary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: what should radiologists know?

Authors:  Misugi Urano; Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah Denewar; Taro Murai; Masaru Mizutani; Masanori Kitase; Kazuya Ohashi; Norio Shiraki; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  The value of ultrasound in diagnosing metastatic internal mammary lymph nodes in preoperative breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaohui Ji; Kexin Shi; Juanjuan Li; Mengying Wei; Zhikun Liu; Jianxia Xu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

3.  A 3-Dimensional Mapping Analysis of Regional Nodal Recurrences in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Carl DeSelm; T Jonathan Yang; Oren Cahlon; Jamie Tisnado; Atif Khan; Erin Gillespie; Simon Powell; Alice Ho
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Does the TNM classification of solitary internal mammary lymph node metastases in breast cancer still apply?

Authors:  V Habraken; T J A van Nijnatten; L de Munck; M Moossdorff; E M Heuts; M B I Lobbes; M L Smidt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Ultrasonic Diffused Optical Tomography in Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Feng Xue; Jie Jiang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.822

6.  Infiltration tendency of internal mammary lymph nodes involvement in patients with breast cancer: anatomical characteristics and implications for target delineation.

Authors:  Yujie Wang; Weixiang Qi; Haoping Xu; Miao Zhang; Yimin Han; Jiayi Chen; Cheng Xu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.