Literature DB >> 27749318

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Patients With Sepsis and Acute Circulatory Failure.

Sebastien Preau1, Perrine Bortolotti, Delphine Colling, Florent Dewavrin, Vincent Colas, Benoit Voisin, Thierry Onimus, Elodie Drumez, Alain Durocher, Alban Redheuil, Fabienne Saulnier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the collapsibility index of the inferior vena cava recorded during a deep standardized inspiration predicts fluid responsiveness in nonintubated patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized study.
SETTING: ICUs at a general and a university hospital. PATIENTS: Nonintubated patients without mechanical ventilation (n = 90) presenting with sepsis-induced acute circulatory failure and considered for volume expansion.
INTERVENTIONS: We assessed hemodynamic status at baseline and after a volume expansion induced by a 30-minute infusion of 500-mL gelatin 4%.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured stroke volume index and collapsibility index of the inferior vena cava under a deep standardized inspiration using transthoracic echocardiography. Vena cava pertinent diameters were measured 15-20 mm caudal to the hepatic vein junction and recorded by bidimensional imaging on a subcostal long-axis view. Standardized respiratory cycles consisted of a deep standardized inspiration followed by passive exhalation. The collapsibility index expressed in percentage equaled the ratio of the difference between end-expiratory and minimum-inspiratory diameter over the end-expiratory diameter. After volume expansion, a relevant (≥ 10%) stroke volume index increase was recorded in 56% patients. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under curve for that collapsibility index was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97). When such index is superior or equal to 48%, fluid responsiveness is predicted with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 90%.
CONCLUSIONS: The collapsibility index of the inferior vena cava during a deep standardized inspiration is a simple, noninvasive bedside predictor of fluid responsiveness in nonintubated patients with sepsis-related acute circulatory failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27749318     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  26 in total

1.  Ultrasound measurements of the caudal vena cava before and after blood donation in 9 greyhound dogs.

Authors:  Kristen A Marshall; Elizabeth J Thomovsky; Aimee C Brooks; Paula A Johnson; Chee Kin Lim; Hock Gan Heng
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  [Perioperative optimization using hemodynamically focused echocardiography in high-risk patients-A practice guide].

Authors:  R F Trauzeddel; M Nordine; H V Groesdonk; G Michels; R Pfister; D A Reuter; T W L Scheeren; C Berger; S Treskatsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Fluid challenge in critically ill patients receiving haemodynamic monitoring: a systematic review and comparison of two decades.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Lorenzo Calabrò; Luca Pugliese; Aulona Lulja; Alexandra Sopuch; Daniela Rosalba; Emanuela Morenghi; Glenn Hernandez; Xavier Monnet; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 19.334

4.  Comparison of inferior vena cava collapsibility and central venous pressure in assessing volume status in shocked patients.

Authors:  Monira T Ismail; Afaf A El-Iraky; Emad El-Din A Ibrahim; Tarek H El Kammash; Ahmed E Abou-Zied
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-05-17

5.  Performance of a 25% Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility in Detecting Fluid Responsiveness When Assessed by Novice Versus Expert Physician Sonologists.

Authors:  Keith A Corl; Nader Azab; Mohammed Nayeemuddin; Alexandra Schick; Thomas Lopardo; Fatima Zeba; Gary Phillips; Grayson Baird; Roland C Merchant; Mitchell M Levy; Michael Blaivas; Adeel Abbasi
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.510

Review 6.  Perioperative echocardiography-guided hemodynamic therapy in high-risk patients: a practical expert approach of hemodynamically focused echocardiography.

Authors:  R F Trauzeddel; M Ertmer; M Nordine; H V Groesdonk; G Michels; R Pfister; D Reuter; T W L Scheeren; C Berger; S Treskatsch
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Comparison of cardiac output, IVC diameters and lactate levels in prediction of mortality in patients in emergency department; An observational study.

Authors:  Kavous Shahsavarinia; Ali Taqizadieh; Payman Moharramzadeh; Ramin Amirchoupani; Ata Mahmoodpoor
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  A comparison of the ultrasound measurement of the inferior vena cava obtained with cardiac and convex transducers.

Authors:  Paweł Andruszkiewicz; Dorota Sobczyk; Krzysztof Nycz; Izabela Górkiewicz-Kot; Mirosław Ziętkiewicz; Karol Wierzbicki; Jacek Wojtczak; Ilona Kowalik
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2017-12-29

9.  Respiratory changes of the inferior vena cava diameter predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  Perrine Bortolotti; Delphine Colling; Vincent Colas; Benoit Voisin; Florent Dewavrin; Julien Poissy; Patrick Girardie; Maeva Kyheng; Fabienne Saulnier; Raphael Favory; Sebastien Preau
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Relationship of inferior vena cava collapsibility to ultrafiltration volume achieved in critically ill hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Matthew J Kaptein; John S Kaptein; Zayar Oo; Elaine M Kaptein
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2018-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.