Literature DB >> 27749068

Implementation of Constrained DFT for Computing Charge Transfer Rates within the Projector Augmented Wave Method.

Marko Melander1, Elvar Ö Jónsson2, Jens J Mortensen3, Tejs Vegge1, Juan Maria García Lastra1.   

Abstract

Combining constrained density function theory (cDFT) with Marcus theory is an efficient and promising way to address charge transfer reactions. Here, we present a general and robust implementation of cDFT within the projector augmented wave (PAW) framework. PAW pseudopotentials offer a reliable frozen-core electron description across the whole periodic table, with good transferability, as well as facilitate the extraction of all-electron quantities. The present implementation is applicable to two different wave function representations, atomic-centered basis sets (LCAO) and the finite-difference (FD) approximation utilizing real-space grids. LCAO can be used for large systems, molecular dynamics, or quick initialization, while more accurate calculations are achieved with the FD basis. Furthermore, the calculations can be performed with flexible boundary conditions, ranging from isolated molecules to periodic systems in one-, two-, or three-dimensions. As such, this implementation is relevant for a wide variety of applications. We also present how to extract the electronic coupling element and reorganization energy from the resulting diabatic cDFT-PAW wave functions for the parametrization of Marcus theory. Here, the combined method is applied to important test cases where practical implementations of DFT fail due to the self-interaction error, such as the dissociation of the helium dimer cation, and it is compared to other established cDFT codes. Moreover, for charge localization in a diamine cation, where it was recently shown that the commonly used generalized gradient and hybrid functionals of DFT failed to produce the localized state, cDFT produces qualitatively and quantitatively accurate results when benchmarked against self-interaction corrected DFT and high-level CCSD(T) calculations at a fraction of the computational cost.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27749068     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  4 in total

1.  Implementation and Validation of Constrained Density Functional Theory Forces in the CP2K Package.

Authors:  Christian S Ahart; Kevin M Rosso; Jochen Blumberger
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.578

2.  The diamine cation is not a chemical example where density functional theory fails.

Authors:  Zulfikhar A Ali; Fredy W Aquino; Bryan M Wong
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Constrained Density Functional Theory: A Potential-Based Self-Consistency Approach.

Authors:  Xavier Gonze; Benjamin Seddon; James A Elliott; Christian Tantardini; Alexander V Shapeev
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 6.578

4.  Neutral excitation density-functional theory: an efficient and variational first-principles method for simulating neutral excitations in molecules.

Authors:  Subhayan Roychoudhury; Stefano Sanvito; David D O'Regan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.