| Literature DB >> 27748363 |
Jean-François Müller1, Zhen Liu2,3, Vinh Son Nguyen2, Trissevgeni Stavrakou1, Jeremy N Harvey2, Jozef Peeters2.
Abstract
Methyl peroxy, a key radical in tropospheric chemistry, was recently shown to react with the hydroxyl radical at an unexpectedly high rate. Here, the molecular reaction mechanisms are elucidated using high-level quantum chemical methodologies and statistical rate theory. Formation of activated methylhydrotrioxide, followed by dissociation into methoxy and hydroperoxy radicals, is found to be the main reaction pathway, whereas methylhydrotrioxide stabilization and methanol formation (from activated and stabilized methylhydrotrioxide) are viable minor channels. Criegee intermediate formation is found to be negligible. Given the theoretical uncertainties, useful constraints on the yields are provided by atmospheric methanol measurements. Using a global chemistry-transport model, we show that the only explanation for the high observed methanol abundances over remote oceans is the title reaction with an overall methanol yield of ∼30%, consistent with the theoretical estimates given their uncertainties. This makes the title reaction a major methanol source (115 Tg per year), comparable to global terrestrial emissions.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27748363 PMCID: PMC5071643 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Potential energy surface for CHOO+OH biradical reactions.
Coupled-cluster energies (kcal mol−1) relative to separated reactants CH3O2 and OH, based on DFT geometries (CCSD(T)-F12/cc-pVTZ-F12//M06-2X-D3/6-311++G(3df,3pd) level of theory). TS, transition state; RC, reactant complex; PC, product complex. The singlet reaction pathways are depicted in black and grey, while the triplet reaction pathways are depicted in red for clarity. TS4 was optimized at M06-D3/6-311++G(3df,3pd) level of theory, see text (each structure with formula or acronym is depicted separately in Supplementary Fig. 2).
Relative energies with inclusion of ZPVE for all structures involved in the title reaction.
| CH3O2+OH | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1RC | −4.4 | −2.7 | 0.025 |
| 3RC | −4.5 | −2.8 | 0.024 |
| TRIOX | −29.9 | −29.0 | 0.015 |
| 1PC | −12.3 | −10.7 | 0.028 |
| 3PC | −12.1 | −10.5 | 0.025 |
| TS1 | −4.3 | −2.6 | 0.026 |
| TS2 | −0.1 | 1.0 | 0.035 |
| TS3 | 3.0 | 4.6 | 0.028 |
| TS4 | −7.1 | −4.9 | 0.027 |
| TS5 | −6.3 | −4.8 | 0.038 |
| TS6 | −12.0 | −9.5 | 0.044 |
| TS7 | −10.9 | −8.1 | 0.081 |
| CH3O+HO2 | −4.8 | −4.3 | – |
| CH3OH+3O2 | −60.1 | −59.3 | – |
| CH2O+H2O2 | −67.4 | −68.6 | – |
*Computed at M06-2X-D3/6-311++G(3df, 3pd) level of theory.
†Computed at CCSD(T)-F12/cc-pVTZ-F12//M06-2X-D3/6-311++G(3df, 3pd) level of theory.
‡T1 diagnostic for CCSD(T)-F12 calculations.
RRKM-calculated rate coefficients
| 1RC→TRIOX | 1.82 × 1013 | 1.81 × 1013 | 1.76 × 1013 | |
| 1RC→1CH2O2+H2O | 3.36 × 1010 | 2.56 × 1010 | 1.20 × 1010 | |
| TRIOX→1PC | 2.38 × 1010 | 2.25 × 1010 | 1.90 × 1010 | |
| 1PC→TRIOX | 1.29 × 1011 | 1.29 × 1011 | 1.23 × 1011 | |
| 1PC→CH3O+HO2 | 2.43 × 1012 | 2.41 × 1012 | 2.32 × 1012 | |
| 1PC→3PC | 3.50 × 1012 | 3.50 × 1012 | 3.44 × 1012 | |
| 3PC→1PC | <3 | 1.87 × 1012 | 1.87 × 1012 | 1.84 × 1012 |
| 1PC→CH2O+H2O2 | 9.67 × 109 | 9.67 × 109 | 9.29 × 109 | |
| 3PC→CH3O+HO2 | <3 | 3.37 × 1012 | 3.36 × 1012 | 3.23 × 1012 |
| 3PC→CH3OH+3O2 | <3 | 4.14 × 1011 | 4.14 × 1011 | 4.14 × 1011 |
| 1PC→CH3OH+1O2 | 1.20 × 1011 | 1.20 × 1011 | 1.20 × 1011 |
*For formation of RC and TRIOX, F(Eth,v) is the initial thermal distribution; for PC and PC, F(Eth,v) is shifted down by collisions, by 0.45, 0.35 and 0.25 kcal mol−1 at 298, 285 and 256 K, respectively (see text).
†k-value obtained using variational RRKM.
‡Rate coefficient of triplet PC reaction preceded by superscript 3 for clarity.
Figure 2Dissociation of product complex and the variational transition state.
Bond lengths are in angstrom. Angles are in degrees.
Predicted products of the CH3O2+OH reaction and best-estimate yields at various pressures and corresponding average temperatures in the troposphere above the tropics.
| CH3O+HO2 | (2) | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.88 |
| CH3OOOH | (4) | 0.107 | 0.074 | 0.035 |
| CH3OH+O2 | (3) | 0.069 | 0.072 | 0.078 |
*Channel 4: CH3O2+OH→thermalized CH3OOOH.
†Overall yield of CH3OH formed through activated CH3OOOH†.
Figure 3Contribution of CHO+OH to the sink of CHO
Modelled yearly averaged contribution (%) of the reaction to the vertically integrated sink of CH3O2. Map created using IDL version 8.2.3.
Overview of model simulations with assumed product yields.
| A | Ignored | – | – | – | – |
| B | Best estimate | 0.86 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0 |
| C | High methanol case | 0.61 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0 |
| D | Low methanol case | 0.975 | 0 | 0.025 | 0 |
| E | High Criegee case | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| A_NO | As A, no ocean source | – | – | – | – |
| C_NO | As C, no ocean source | 0.61 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0 |
| C_VR | As C, low k(CH3OOH+OH) | 0.61 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0 |
*Methanol yield from activated trioxide multiplied (divided) by 3 in run C (D) relative to best estimate. Stabilisation fraction multiplied by 3 in run C, taken equal to zero in run D.
†Not a theoretical prediction.
‡Oceanic methanol emission omitted.
§Use lower rate for reaction CH3OOH+OH, within recommended uncertainty range.
Globally averaged molar yields of CH3O, stabilized trioxide, CH3OH and CH2OO adopted in model runs. The yields are pressure- and temperature-dependent (see text).
Figure 4Impact of CHO+OH on key compounds abundances.
Annually averaged modelled changes (in %) in near-surface concentrations of (a) H2O2, (b) CH3OOH, (c) CH3OH and (d) CH3O2 in the high methanol simulation (run C). Maps created using IDL version 8.2.3.
Figure 5Measured and modelled methanol over the remote Tropical Pacific.
Measurements from the Pacific Exploratory Mission in the tropical Pacific (PEM-Tropics-B)6. Solid (dotted) lines denote simulations including (excluding) the oceanic source of methanol. The number of measurements per altitude bin is indicated on the right. The error bars represent the s.d.'s of the measurements. The nominal precision of the measurements was 25% (ref. 65).
Measured CH3OH over oceans and model biases.
| PEM-Tropics-B | Pacific | 934 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.54 | 0.87 | 0.74 |
| PEM-West-B | N.-W. Pacific | 702 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.99 | 1.35 | 1.26 |
| INTEX-A | N. Atlantic | 1,689 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.97 | 0.93 |
| ITCT | N. Atlantic | 991 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 1.15 | 1.12 |
| INTEX-B | Pacific | 1,012 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.73 |
| Mauna Loa | N. Pacific | 900 | 0.50 | 0.23 | 0.63 | 0.89 | 0.64 |
| Cape Verde | N. Atlantic | 768 | 0.38 | 0.18 | 0.73 | 1.06 | 0.68 |
| AMT-22 | Atlantic | 420 | 1.12 | 0.52 | 1.33 | 1.96 | 1.35 |
| INDOEX-1999 | S. Indian | 708 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 0.94 | 1.56 | 1.19 |
| Mean model bias factor | 0.73 | 0.45 | 0.82 | 1.12 | 0.92 | ||
| Mean discrepancy factor | 1.47 | 2.25 | 1.31 | 1.26 | 1.31 |
*Defined as , with M/O the ratio of the averaged modelled values to the averaged observed values for campaign i.
†Defined as ,that is, it is the geometrically averaged ratio of the higher to the lower among the model and observed averages.
Averaged observed mixing ratios (pptv) and ratios of averaged modelled to averaged observed values for model runs defined in Table 4. See Supplementary Fig. 14 for more information on the measurements.