Literature DB >> 27748320

A systematic review on the safety and effectiveness of yttrium-90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis.

Zhongzhi Jia1, Guomin Jiang1, Feng Tian1, Chunfu Zhu2, Xihu Qin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Over the past two decades, several advances have been made in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). Yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) radioembolization has recently been made a treatment option for patients with HCC and PVTT. However, there is still a need to systematicly evaluate the outcomes of 90 Y radioembolization for HCC and PVTT. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of 90 Y radioembolization for HCC and PVTT. We performed a systematic review of clinical trials, clinical studies, and abstracts from conferences that qualified for analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, CINAHL, and the "gray" literature (Google Scholar) were searched for all reports (1991-2016) related to 90 Y radioembolization for HCC and PVTT.
RESULTS: A total of 14 clinical studies and three abstracts from conferences including 722 patients qualified for the analysis. The median length of follow-up was 7.2 months; the median time to progression was 5.6 months, and median disease control rate was 74.3%. Radiological response data were reported in five studies, and the median reported value of patients with complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were 3.2%, 16.5%, 31.3%, and 28%, respectively. The median survival was 9.7 months for all patients, including the median overall survival (OS) were 12.1, 6.1 months of Child-Pugh class A and B patients, and the median OS were 6.1, 13.4 months of main and branch PVTT patients, respectively. The common toxicities were fatigue, nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain, mostly not requiring medical intervention needed no medication intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: 90 Y radioembolization is a safe and effective treatment for HCC and PVTT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27748320      PMCID: PMC5051218          DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.191139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1319-3767            Impact factor:   2.485


Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) occurs in a substantial portion of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and in approximately 10%–40% of patients at diagnosis.[12] PVTT has a profound adverse effect on prognosis, with the median survival time of patients who have unresectable HCC with PVTT being significantly reduced (2–4 months) compared with those without PVTT (10–24 months).[13] The presence of PVTT also limits the treatment options, with HCC treatment guidelines often considering PVTT a contraindication for transplantation, curative resection, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).[45] Although the presence of PVTT poses a challenging treatment dilemma,[1] many treatments of HCC with PVTT have been reported, including surgical,[2] TACE,[456789] external beam radiotherapy,[10] gamma-knife radiosurgery,[4] TACE combined with endovascular implantation of an iodine-125 seed strand,[11] and transarterial radioembolization.[12] However, the optimal treatment for patients with HCC and PVTT remains largely controversial.[7] Yttrium-90 (90 Y) radioembolization is a locoregional liver-directed therapy that involves transcatheter delivery of particles embedded with the radioisotope 90Y. In addition to obliteration of the arterial blood supply, the 90Y results in a 50–150 Gy dose of radiation to the tumor tissue, which results in tumor necrosis, including HCC and PVTT.[13] It was reported that 90Y radioembolization is a safe and effective treatment for patients with HCC and PVTT.[6] However, there is still a need to systematically evaluate the outcomes of this treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively review the safety and effectiveness of 90Y radioembolization for HCC and PVTT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Search strategy

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, CINAHL and the “gray” literature (Google Scholar) were searched from January 1, 1991 (the first commercial availability of the 90Y products) to January 25, 2016, for the full text describing 90Y in the treatment of HCC and PVTT (keywords: (Liver cancer or liver tumor or primary liver cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma); (portal vein tumor thrombosis or portal vein thrombosis); and (yttrium-90 or 90Y or TheraSphere or SIR-Spheres) and English language). We retrieved potentially relevant articles and reviewed their reference lists to find studies that our search strategy may have missed. Clinical trials, clinical studies, and abstracts from conferences that qualified for analysis were included in this review. The primary objective of this study was to determine the overall survival (OS), and the secondary objectives were to identify the radiological response and clinical toxicity.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were (1) clinical trials, clinical studies, or abstracts from conferences; (2) describing 90Y in the treatment of PVTT; (3) at least include the primary objective: OS. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Review articles, animal studies, laboratory investigations, case reports, and case series; (2) any duplicated clinical studies. All the clinical trials, clinical studies, and abstracts from conferences were reviewed for qualification according to our study criteria.

Data extraction

A standardized data extraction database was created by tabulating the following information: First author, year of publication, prospective or retrospective design, quality criteria, number of patients, patient characteristics, assessment criteria (European Association for the Study of the Liver [EASL]; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]; World Health Organization [WHO]), time to progression (TTP), disease control rate, radiological response, OS, and clinical toxicity. Two members of the research team conducted the literature search independently to verify data accuracy and completeness, with a third one resolving any discrepancy. Studies were classified into three levels of evidence as follows: Level I, randomized controlled trials (RCTs); level II, non-RCTs or well-designed cohort studies; and level III, observational studies, as described by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Definitions

OS was calculated in months for all subjects from the date of radioembolization treatment to the date of death or last follow-up. Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of patients who have achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) to 90Y radioembolization.[14]

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 225 English reports from January 1, 1991, to January 25, 2016. An additional search using Google Scholar found no additional relevant articles. Of the 225 reports, a total of 208 reports were excluded due to unqualified studies (n = 182), review articles (n = 21), and duplicated clinical studies (n = 5) [Figure 1]. Ultimately, a total of 17 reports, including 14 studies (five prospective and nine retrospective) and three abstracts from conferences were included in this study (Kokabi N, et al.;[15] Mazzaferro V, et al.;[16] Memon K, et al.;[17] Woodall CE, et al.;[18] Kulik LM, et al.;[19] Salem R, et al.;[20] Garin E, et al.;[21] Sangro B, et al.;[22] Inarrairaegui M, et al.;[23] Salem R, et al.;[24] Tsai AL, et al.;[25] Hilgard P, et al.;[26] Akinwande O, et al.;[27] Lee VH, et al.;[28] Biederman DM, et al.;[29] Kim YH, et al.;[30] El Fouly A, et al.[31]). The quality of evidence was as follows: level II, n = 6, and level III, n = 11.
Figure 1

Flow diagram of literature search

Flow diagram of literature search Table 1 summarizes the patient demographic characteristics of the included reports. A total of 722 cases were included in the final analysis. The median value of the percentage of male patients was 80.5% (range 70%–94.2%) with a median age of 64 years (range 56–67 years). The median percentage of the reported main PVTT was 42.1% (range 0%–100%), and the extrahepatic metastases were present in a median of 12% cases (range 0%–31.9%). The median percentage of Child-Pugh class A, B, C were 67% (range 20%–92.7%), 33% (range 7.3%–62%), and 0 (0%–27%), respectively. The median value of the radioactivity delivered was 2.6 GBq (range 1.4–3.1 GBq). Of the 722 cases, glass microspheres were used in 540 cases, resin microspheres were used in 160 cases, and the other 22 cases were unspecified.
Table 1

Summary of the characteristics of the included studies

Summary of the characteristics of the included studies Table 2 summarizes the effectiveness of 90Y treatment of the included studies. The median length of follow-up was 7.2 months (range 6–36 months), the median TTP was 5.6 months (range 4.9–9 months), and the median disease control rate was 74.3% (range 16.7%–94%). Radiological response data were reported in five studies; the median reported value of patients with CR, PR, SD, and progressive disease (PD) were 3.2% (range 0%–12.2%), 16.5% (range 5%–73.2%), 31.3% (range 5%–64%), and 28% (range 0%–80%), respectively. OS results were reported in all studies, with the median survival being 9.7 months (range 3–23.7 months).
Table 2

Summary of the outcomes of the included studies

Summary of the outcomes of the included studies The Child–Pugh class A (n = 70) and B (n = 85) patients were reported in four studies (only two studies identified the total patients number), with median OS being 12.1 months (7.4–23.7 months) of Child-Pugh class A patients, and 6.1 months (3.6–7 months) of Child–Pugh class B patients [Table 2]. The main PVTT (n = 70) and branch PVTT (n = 100) patients were reported in three studies, with median OS being 6.1 months (4.5–12 months) of main PVTT patients, and 13.4 months (6.5–21.5 months) of branch PVTT patients [Table 2]. Table 3 presents a thorough overview of the toxicity associated with 90Y radioembolization. Although toxicities were not available for most of the included studies, the common toxicities were fatigue (range 2.9%–67%), abdominal pain (range 2.9%–57%), and nausea/vomiting (range 5.7%–28%).
Table 3

Summary the toxicity of patients in the included studies

Summary the toxicity of patients in the included studies

DISCUSSION

This review demonstrated the median disease control rate as 74.3%, and median survival as 9.7 months following 90Y radioembolization for HCC and PVTT patients. The median OS were 12.1 and 6.1 months of Child-Pugh class A and B patients, respectively, and the median OS were 6.1 and 13.4 months of main and branch PVTT patients, respectively. 90Y radioembolization treatment, a form of intraarterial brachytherapy, is a technique in which glass or resin particles are labeled with 90Y. The radioisotope 90Y is a pure β-emitter with no primary gamma radiation. HCC and PVTT are fed mainly by hepatic arterial system rather than portal venous blood. Therefore, the dominant arterial flow of malignant tissue allows the delivery of high doses of radiation to tumors while keeping the exposure of the healthy liver at minimum with selective 90Y microsphere distribution. It was reported that 90Y internal radiation therapy can provide tumor doses as high as 50-150 Gy, in contrast to traditional whole liver external beam radiation where the radiation dose has been limited to 30 Gy to prevent adjacent organ injury.[3233] To date, the published reports documented in this sample demonstrate that 90Y treatment can be used safely in patients with portal circulation compromised at the level of the first-order portal branches.[121734] Also, Tsai et al.[10] reported that 90Y treatment is tolerated in patients with HCC and major PVTT, and the median OS (7 months) is promising. Most of the studied patients had end-stage disease, reflected by the high proportion of patients with Child-Pugh class B or C and main PVTT. The median disease control rate in the review of studies was 74.3%, with a median TTP of 5.6 months, and median survival of 9.7 months. It demonstrates that 90Y radioembolization is an effective treatment for HCC and PVTT. 90Y may also lead to tumor downstaging, which might allow for subsequent surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation. From this study, the median OS of patients in Child-Pugh class A was longer than patients in Child-Pugh class B (12.1 vs 6.1 months); and the median OS of patients in branch PVTT was longer than that in main PVTT patients (13.4 vs 6.1 months). It shows that tumor progression was slower in patients with Child-Pugh class A and branch PVTT than patients with Child-Pugh class B and main PVTT. Although embolization with 90Y does results in permanent vascular blockade with glass or resin particles, the smaller caliber of the particles (20-30 μm glass, 20-60 μm resin) impart the theoretical advantage of a lesser degree of macroscopic arterial occlusion. It was reported that the 90Y treatment exerts less of an ischemic effect compared with TACE (threefold lower incidence of postembolization syndrome).[35] Overall, 90Y treatment is a well-tolerated procedure, especially when compared with TACE. The most frequently encountered toxicities are symptoms of the post-radioembolization syndrome, including fatigue, abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, and fever. Although the incidence of symptoms of post-radioembolization syndrome was not reported in most of the included studies, the common toxicities were abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue. Fortunately, postembolization syndrome can be managed with medication and the symptoms generally subside within a week post-radioembolization.

Study limitation

This study was limited by the small number and quality of included studies, as only 14 studies and three abstracts were included and the overall evidence was level II or III by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, and all the included studies were not specifically focused on and lacked details related to the etiological factors (especially hepatitis B- and hepatitis C-related HCC). Also, the number of patients and the observation time was short in the included studies, all of which may bias the results. Furthermore, only four studies mentioned the OS of different Child-Pugh class (A/B) and three studies mentioned the OS of different PVTT location (main/branch), which may also bias the results. Lastly, we cannot prove which 90Y product (glass/resin) is better due to the small studied sample of only 160 cases that used resin microsphere.

CONCLUSIONS

90Y radioembolization is a safe and effective treatment for HCC and PVTT. However, this study lacks adequate power to draw definitive conclusions based on the presented data. A larger cohort might allow more meaningful conclusions and more robust survival data.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported by High-level Medical Talents Training Project of Changzhou (NO. 2016CZBJ009 and NO. 2016CZLJ007). Social Development Fund of Jiangsu Science and Technology (NO. BE2016658). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  31 in total

1.  Radioembolization with yttrium-90 glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: European experience on safety and long-term survival.

Authors:  Philip Hilgard; Monia Hamami; Amr El Fouly; André Scherag; Stefan Müller; Judith Ertle; Till Heusner; Vito R Cicinnati; Andreas Paul; Andreas Bockisch; Guido Gerken; Gerald Antoch
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Survival after yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma across Barcelona clinic liver cancer stages: a European evaluation.

Authors:  Bruno Sangro; Livio Carpanese; Roberto Cianni; Rita Golfieri; Daniele Gasparini; Samer Ezziddin; Philipp M Paprottka; Francesco Fiore; Mark Van Buskirk; Jose Ignacio Bilbao; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Rita Salvatori; Emanuela Giampalma; Onelio Geatti; Kai Wilhelm; Ralf Thorsten Hoffmann; Francesco Izzo; Mercedes Iñarrairaegui; Carlo Ludovico Maini; Carlo Urigo; Alberta Cappelli; Alessandro Vit; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Tobias Franz Jakobs; Secondo Lastoria
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Hepatocellular carcinoma in Central Europe: prognostic features and survival.

Authors:  M Schöniger-Hekele; C Müller; M Kutilek; C Oesterreicher; P Ferenci; A Gangl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Use of yttrium-90 microspheres in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Andrea Lan Tsai; Charles T Burke; Andrew S Kennedy; Dominic T Moore; Matthew A Mauro; Robert D Dixon; Joseph M Stavas; Stephen A Bernard; Amir H Khandani; Bert H O'Neil
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Personalized dosimetry with intensification using 90Y-loaded glass microsphere radioembolization induces prolonged overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Etienne Garin; Yan Rolland; Julien Edeline; Nicolas Icard; Laurence Lenoir; Sophie Laffont; Habiba Mesbah; Mathias Breton; Laurent Sulpice; Karim Boudjema; Tanguy Rohou; Jean-Luc Raoul; Bruno Clement; Eveline Boucher
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Safety and efficacy of 90Y radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with and without portal vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Laura M Kulik; Brian I Carr; Mary F Mulcahy; Robert J Lewandowski; Bassel Atassi; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Al Benson; Albert A Nemcek; Vanessa L Gates; Michael Abecassis; Reed A Omary; Riad Salem
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Apparent diffusion coefficient quantification as an early imaging biomarker of response and predictor of survival following yttrium-90 radioembolization for unresectable infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Nima Kokabi; Juan C Camacho; Minzhi Xing; Deqiang Qiu; Hiroumi Kitajima; Pardeep K Mittal; Hyun S Kim
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2014-10

8.  Is selective internal radioembolization safe and effective for patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma and venous thrombosis?

Authors:  Charles E Woodall; Charles R Scoggins; Susan F Ellis; Clifton M Tatum; Michael J Hahl; Kadiyala V Ravindra; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Morris Sherman
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Yttrium-90 radioembolization for advanced inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Victor Ho-Fun Lee; Dennis Kc Leung; Mai-Yee Luk; Chi-Chung Tong; Martin Wm Law; Sherry Cy Ng; Ka-Kin Wong; Ronnie Tp Poon; Dora Lw Kwong; To-Wai Leung
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  2019 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India: The Puri II Recommendations.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar; Subrat K Acharya; Shivaram P Singh; Anil Arora; Radha K Dhiman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Anil C Anand; Prashant Bhangui; Yogesh K Chawla; Siddhartha Datta Gupta; Vinod K Dixit; Ajay Duseja; Naveen Kalra; Premashish Kar; Suyash S Kulkarni; Rakesh Kumar; Manoj Kumar; Ram Madhavan; V G Mohan Prasad; Amar Mukund; Aabha Nagral; Dipanjan Panda; Shashi B Paul; Padaki N Rao; Mohamed Rela; Manoj K Sahu; Vivek A Saraswat; Samir R Shah; Praveen Sharma; Sunil Taneja; Manav Wadhawan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-09-23

2.  Radioembolization in the setting of liver transplantation: great expectations or hard times?

Authors:  Quirino Lai; Gianluca Mennini
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Hepatocellular carcinoma and macrovascular tumor thrombosis: treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for survival.

Authors:  Nokjung Kim; Myung-Won You
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  New Evidence and Perspectives on the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Wen-Tao Bo; Jian Sun; Xiao Xiang; Jin-Yi Lang; Jian-Hong Zhong; Le-Qun Li
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2017-03-30

Review 5.  Contralateral Liver Hypertrophy and Oncological Outcome Following Radioembolization with 90Y-Microspheres: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emrullah Birgin; Erik Rasbach; Steffen Seyfried; Nils Rathmann; Steffen J Diehl; Stefan O Schoenberg; Christoph Reissfelder; Nuh N Rahbari
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Treatments of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: Current Status and Controversy.

Authors:  Zhu-Jian Deng; Le Li; Yu-Xian Teng; Yu-Qi Zhang; Yu-Xin Zhang; Hao-Tian Liu; Jian-Li Huang; Zhen-Xiu Liu; Liang Ma; Jian-Hong Zhong
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2021-08-10

Review 7.  Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: advances and challenges.

Authors:  Jin-Fang Jiang; Yong-Cong Lao; Bao-Hong Yuan; Jun Yin; Xin Liu; Long Chen; Jian-Hong Zhong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-16

Review 8.  Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis: Beyond the known frontiers.

Authors:  Lucia Cerrito; Brigida Eleonora Annicchiarico; Roberto Iezzi; Antonio Gasbarrini; Maurizio Pompili; Francesca Romana Ponziani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.