STUDY OBJECTIVES: It is commonly accepted that sleep is beneficial to memory processes, but it is still unclear if this benefit originates from improved memory consolidation or enhanced information processing. It has thus been proposed that sleep may also promote forgetting of undesirable and non-essential memories, a process required for optimization of cognitive resources. We tested the hypothesis that non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) promotes forgetting of irrelevant information, more specifically when processing information in working memory (WM), while REM sleep (REMS) facilitates the consolidation of important information. METHODS: We recorded sleep patterns of rats trained in a radial maze in three different tasks engaging either the long-term or short-term storage of information, as well as a gradual level of interference. RESULTS: We observed a transient increase in REMS amount on the day the animal learned the rule of a long-term/reference memory task (RM), and, in contrast, a positive correlation between the performance of rats trained in a WM task involving an important processing of interference and the amount of NREMS or slow wave activity. Various oscillatory events were also differentially modulated by the type of training involved. Notably, NREMS spindles and REMS rapid theta increase with RM training, while sharp-wave ripples increase with all types of training. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that REMS, but also rapid oscillations occurring during NREMS would be specifically implicated in the long-term memory in RM, whereas NREMS and slow oscillations could be involved in the forgetting of irrelevant information required for WM.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: It is commonly accepted that sleep is beneficial to memory processes, but it is still unclear if this benefit originates from improved memory consolidation or enhanced information processing. It has thus been proposed that sleep may also promote forgetting of undesirable and non-essential memories, a process required for optimization of cognitive resources. We tested the hypothesis that non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) promotes forgetting of irrelevant information, more specifically when processing information in working memory (WM), while REM sleep (REMS) facilitates the consolidation of important information. METHODS: We recorded sleep patterns of rats trained in a radial maze in three different tasks engaging either the long-term or short-term storage of information, as well as a gradual level of interference. RESULTS: We observed a transient increase in REMS amount on the day the animal learned the rule of a long-term/reference memory task (RM), and, in contrast, a positive correlation between the performance of rats trained in a WM task involving an important processing of interference and the amount of NREMS or slow wave activity. Various oscillatory events were also differentially modulated by the type of training involved. Notably, NREMS spindles and REMS rapid theta increase with RM training, while sharp-wave ripples increase with all types of training. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that REMS, but also rapid oscillations occurring during NREMS would be specifically implicated in the long-term memory in RM, whereas NREMS and slow oscillations could be involved in the forgetting of irrelevant information required for WM.
Authors: Michael D Saxe; Gaël Malleret; Svetlana Vronskaya; Indira Mendez; A Denise Garcia; Michael V Sofroniew; Eric R Kandel; René Hen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-03-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Philippe Peigneux; Steven Laureys; Sonia Fuchs; Fabienne Collette; Fabien Perrin; Jean Reggers; Christophe Phillips; Christian Degueldre; Guy Del Fiore; Joël Aerts; André Luxen; Pierre Maquet Journal: Neuron Date: 2004-10-28 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Russell E Nicholls; Juan Marcos Alarcon; Gaël Malleret; Reed C Carroll; Michael Grody; Svetlana Vronskaya; Eric R Kandel Journal: Neuron Date: 2008-04-10 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Mégane Missaire; Nicolas Fraize; Mickaël Antoine Joseph; Al Mahdy Hamieh; Régis Parmentier; Aline Marighetto; Paul Antoine Salin; Gaël Malleret Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 3.240