Literature DB >> 27748040

Maternal factors and the risk of birth defects after IVF and ICSI: a whole of population cohort study.

M J Davies1, A R Rumbold1, J L Marino2, K Willson3, L C Giles1,3, M J Whitrow1,3, W Scheil4, L J Moran5, J G Thompson1, M Lane1, V M Moore1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the contribution of maternal factors to major birth defects after in vitro fertilisation (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and natural conception.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study in South Australia for the period January 1986 to December 2002.
SETTING: A whole of population study. POPULATION: A census of all IVF and ICSI linked to registries for births, pregnancy terminations, and birth defects (diagnosed before a child's fifth birthday).
METHODS: Odds ratios (ORs) for birth defects were calculated among IVF, ICSI, and natural conceptions for maternal age, parity, pre-pregnancy BMI, smoking, pre-existing diseases, and conditions in pregnancy, with adjustment for confounding factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Birth defects classified by International Classification of Diseases (ninth revision) and British Paediatric Association (ICD9-BPA) codes.
RESULTS: There were 2211 IVF, 1399 ICSI, and 301 060 naturally conceived births. The unadjusted prevalence of any birth defect was 7.1, 9.9, and 5.7% in the IVF, ICSI, and natural conception groups, respectively. As expected, the risk of birth defects increased with maternal age among the natural conceptions. In contrast, for IVF and ICSI combined, relative to natural conceptions, births to women aged ≤29 years had a higher risk (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.04-1.94), births to women aged 35-39 years had no difference in risk (aOR 1.01; 95% CI 0.74-1.37), and births to women aged ≥40 years had a lower risk of defects (aOR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.92). Defects were also elevated for nulliparity, anaemia, and urinary tract infection in births after ICSI, but not after IVF.
CONCLUSIONS: The usual age-birth defect relationship is reversed in births after IVF and ICSI, and the associations for other maternal factors and defects vary between IVF and ICSI. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Risk of birth defects in women over 40 years is lower after infertility treatment than for natural conceptions.
© 2016 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth defects; ICSI; IVF; Infertility; maternal factors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27748040     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  9 in total

1.  Health of Infants After ART-Treated, Subfertile, and Fertile Deliveries.

Authors:  Sunah S Hwang; Dmitry Dukhovny; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Stacey Missmer; Hafsatou Diop; Eugene Declercq; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  [Comparison of two methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in male reproductive tract].

Authors:  Q DU; K Hong; B C Pan
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-08-18

3.  Comparison of ICSI and conventional IVF in non-male factor patients with less than four oocytes.

Authors:  Mete Isikoglu; Ayse Kendirci Ceviren; Tugba Cetin; Aysenur Avci; Batu Aydinuraz; Ozlem Karabay Akgul; Mehmet Karaca
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  IVF or ICSI for fertility preservation?

Authors:  Bhorika Aggarwal; Amanda L Evans; Howard Ryan; Sarah J Martins da Silva
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2021-03-05

5.  DNA methylation in newborns conceived by assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Siri E Håberg; Christian M Page; Yunsung Lee; Haakon E Nustad; Maria C Magnus; Kristine L Haftorn; Ellen Ø Carlsen; William R P Denault; Jon Bohlin; Astanand Jugessur; Per Magnus; Håkon K Gjessing; Robert Lyle
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Are sperm parameters able to predict the success of assisted reproductive technology? A retrospective analysis of over 22,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Villani; Daria Morini; Giorgia Spaggiari; Angela Immacolata Falbo; Beatrice Melli; Giovanni Battista La Sala; Marilina Romeo; Manuela Simoni; Lorenzo Aguzzoli; Daniele Santi
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.456

7.  Quality of IVF status registration in the Estonian Medical Birth Registry: a national record linkage study.

Authors:  Kärt Allvee; Mati Rahu; Kai Haldre; Helle Karro; Kaja Rahu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 8.  Reproductive options for families at risk of Osteogenesis Imperfecta: a review.

Authors:  Lidiia Zhytnik; Kadri Simm; Andres Salumets; Maire Peters; Aare Märtson; Katre Maasalu
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.123

9.  Absolute Risk of Adverse Obstetric Outcomes Among Twin Pregnancies After In Vitro Fertilization by Maternal Age.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Huifeng Shi; Lian Chen; Danni Zheng; Xiaoyu Long; Yunjun Zhang; Haibo Wang; Ying Shi; Yangyu Zhao; Yuan Wei; Jie Qiao
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.