Literature DB >> 27747973

Transforming Latent Utilities to Health Utilities: East Does Not Meet West.

Feng Xie1,2,3, Eleanor Pullenayegum4,5, A Simon Pickard6,7, Juan Manuel Ramos Goñi8, Min-Woo Jo9,10, Ataru Igarashi11.   

Abstract

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are a promising alternative to more resource-intensive preference elicitation methods such as time trade-off (TTO), as pairwise comparisons are more amenable to online completion, which can save time and money. However, modeling DCE data produces latent utilities which are on an unknown scale. Therefore, latent utilities need to be transformed to a full health-dead scale before they can be used in quality-adjusted life year calculations. We aimed to explore transformation functions from DCE-derived latent utilities to TTO-derived health utilities. We used EQ-5D-5L valuation data from eight different countries that collected both DCE and TTO data by using a standardized protocol. Results found less variation in the function that transformed latent utilities to health utilities in the western countries than in the eastern countries. While a global transformation function is not recommended, results suggest that regional transformation functions could potentially be used to derive health utilities from DCE data.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  discrete choice experiment; health utility; latent utility; time trade-off; transforming

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27747973     DOI: 10.1002/hec.3444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  7 in total

1.  Increasing respondent engagement in composite time trade-off tasks by imposing three minimum trade-offs to improve data quality.

Authors:  Ruixuan Jiang; Thomas Kohlmann; Todd A Lee; Axel Mühlbacher; James Shaw; Surrey Walton; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-08-28

2.  Population Norms for SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in China.

Authors:  Shitong Xie; Jing Wu; Feng Xie
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.

Authors:  Mina Bahrampour; Joshua Byrnes; Richard Norman; Paul A Scuffham; Martin Downes
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-05-04

4.  Development of Japanese utility weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) SCT4.

Authors:  Takeru Shiroiwa; Yoko Moriyama; Hiromi Nakamura-Thomas; Mie Morikawa; Takashi Fukuda; Laurie Batchelder; Eirini-Christina Saloniki; Juliette Malley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Do health preferences differ among Asian populations? A comparison of EQ-5D-5L discrete choice experiments data from 11 Asian studies.

Authors:  Zhihao Yang; Fredrick Dermawan Purba; Asrul Akmal Shafie; Ataru Igarashi; Eliza Lai-Yi Wong; Hilton Lam; Hoang Van Minh; Hsiang-Wen Lin; Jeonghoon Ahn; Juntana Pattanaphesaj; Min-Woo Jo; Vu Quynh Mai; Jan Busschbach; Nan Luo; Jie Jiang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.440

6.  Conceptual Framework for Optimised Proxy Value Set Selection Through Supra-National Value Set Development for the EQ-5D Instruments.

Authors:  Agata Łaszewska; Ayesha Sajjad; Jan Busschbach; Judit Simon; Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.558

7.  Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off.

Authors:  Ruixuan Jiang; James Shaw; Axel Mühlbacher; Todd A Lee; Surrey Walton; Thomas Kohlmann; Richard Norman; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.