Literature DB >> 27747833

Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Elderly Haemodialysis Patients Using the STOPP Criteria.

Krystina Parker1,2, Willy Aasebø3, Knut Stavem4,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is commonly applied to elderly haemodialysis patients for treating terminal renal failure and multiple co-morbidities. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in multidrug regimens in geriatric populations can be identified using specially designed screening tools.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of PIMs by applying the Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria and the Beers criteria to elderly haemodialysis patients and to assess the association of some risk factors with the presence of PIMs.
METHODS: Fifty-one elderly haemodialysis patients participated; their median age was 74 (range 65-89) years, and 77 % of them were male. Demographic data, co-morbidity and medication lists were collected from the electronic medical records of the patients. The STOPP criteria were applied by two physicians independently to identify PIMs. The association of some risk factors with PIMs were assessed using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: The patients used a median of 13 (range 7-21) medications per day. The overall prevalence of PIMs using the STOPP criteria was 63 %, and using the Beers criteria was 43 %. The most prevalent PIMs were proton-pump inhibitors. Benzodiazepines and first-generation antihistamines were related to side effects such as falls in the previous 3 months, and calcium-channel blockers were associated with chronic constipation. The number of PIMs was not significantly associated with number of medications, age, sex and co-morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS: The STOPP criteria revealed a high prevalence of PIMs in a population of elderly patients receiving haemodialysis.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27747833      PMCID: PMC5042944          DOI: 10.1007/s40801-016-0088-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes        ISSN: 2198-9788


Key Points

Background

Elderly haemodialysis patients are considered to be a vulnerable group due to the presence of renal failure with underlying co-morbidities that require the use of multiple drugs. Drug efficacy in these patients is influenced by age-related changes, altered nutritional state and the haemodialysis treatment they receive. Haemodialysis alters the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of many drugs due to the presence of continuous changes in the fluid balance and uraemic toxin levels, and this may increase the risk of drug-to-drug interactions and adverse side effects in haemodialysis patients. International guidelines for management of patients with renal failure point to the importance of dose reduction or discontinuation of certain drugs and provide cautionary notes for prescribing (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome [KDIGO] 2013) [1] or recommend regular review of medication lists (Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative [KDOQI]) [2]. Several other approaches can be used to identify potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), such as a targeted multidisciplinary team approach, consulting with pharmacists [3-5] or using validated screening tools [6-8]. Two recent studies used such a screening tool called the Beers criteria [9, 10], reporting a high prevalence of PIMs in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions (STOPP) was used in two randomized trials involving geriatric populations, in which it contributed to a significant reduction of PIMs both at the time of discharge after acute hospitalization and up to 6 months after discharge [11], as well as reductions in the number of falls and costs [12]. Two European studies involving geriatric populations found that the number of PIMs was higher when using the STOPP criteria than when using the Beers criteria [11, 13]. However, to our knowledge the STOPP criteria have not been previously applied to elderly haemodialysis patients. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of PIMs using the STOPP criteria and the Beers criteria in elderly haemodialysis patients and to assess the association of age, sex, number of medications and co-morbidity as risk factors for PIMs in this population.

Methods

Study Population and Data Collection

There were 102 patients treated in the dialysis centre of Akershus University Hospital in Norway between July and December 2012, and those aged ≥65 years were asked to participate in this study. Fifty-one patients were eligible for inclusion, and they all agreed to participate. The following information was collected from the electronic medical records of the patients: age, sex, number of prescribed medications, cause of kidney disease, severity of co-morbidity (classified using the Charlson Co-morbidity Index [CCI]), time on haemodialysis and dialysis treatment quality index (quantified as urea clearance (Kt/V)). Supplementary information about some medication side effects was collected from patient interviews, such as falls during the previous 3 months, chronic constipation (for more than 3 months before starting haemodialysis) and current dizziness when at home.

Identification of Potentially Inappropriate Medications

PIMs were identified using the STOPP criteria and the updated Beers Criteria [6, 14]. The STOPP criteria were developed and validated through a Delphi consensus process by 18 experts in geriatric pharmacotherapy and include 65 indicators to identify important drug-to-drug and drug-to-disease interactions [6]. The STOPP criteria exhibit a high sensitivity in detecting PIMs and good inter-rater reliability [6, 15, 16]. Two physicians independently applied the STOPP and Beers criteria to review the medication lists of all of the patients included in the present study. In case of disagreement in identified PIMs between the two raters a consensus was achieved by open discussion. We also collected information on the use of nephrology-specific drugs, which are not included in STOPP criteria, such as phosphate binders, Vitamin D analogues, active vitamin D and erythropoietin.

Statistical Analyses

The data were analysed using SPSS statistical software (version 20, IBM, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics are presented using mean ± SD or median (range) values. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the number of PIMs between groups dichotomized according to age, sex, CCI, time in dialysis and number of medications based on those equal to or above the median versus those below the median. We applied a 5 % significance cut-off in two-sided tests. Inter-rater agreement between the two raters for assessments using the STOPP and Beers screening tools is presented with % agreement (proportion of cases for which the raters agree) and kappa coefficient for 2 × 2 tables. Strength of reliability coefficients was defined using the following nomenclature [17]: <0.20 poor, 0.21–0.40 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 good, 0.81–1.00 very good.

Results

The clinical and demographic characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. The most common co-morbidities were hypertension, cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. The patients used a total of 652 medications and a median of 13 (range 7–21) different medications each day, and of these, a median of 5.2 (range 2– 8) drugs can be defined as nephrology-specific drugs. PIMs were identified in 32 patients (63 %) by using STOPP criteria. Table 2 lists the most prevalent inappropriate medications according to the STOPP criteria. Twenty-one patients (42 %) had one PIM and 11 patients (22 %) had two PIMs. Nineteen patients (37 %) reported falls during the previous 3 months, nine patients (18 %) reported chronic constipation before start of dialysis and three patients (6 %) reported dizziness. The most prevalent PIMs according to STOPP were proton pump inhibitors at full therapeutic dosage use (n = 11; 22 %), calcium-channel blockers (n = 7; 14 %) in patients with chronic constipation and benzodiazepines (n = 6; 12 %) in those prone to falls.
Table 1

Characteristics of the study population (n = 51)

Sex, male39 (77)
Age, years, median (range)74 (65–89)
Dialysis
 Time in haemodialysis, months, median (range)8 (0–108)
 Urea clearance, Kt/V, mean ± SD1.47 ± 0.29
 Arteriovenous fistula29 (57)
 Haemodialysis catheter22 (43)
Diagnosis
 Nephrosclerosis18 (35)
 Post-renal diseasea 8 (16)
 Otherb 8 (16)
 Diabetic nephropathy7 (14)
 Unknown7 (14)
 Glomerulonephritis3 (6)
Co-morbidities
 Charlson Co-morbidity Index, median (range)5 (2–9)
 Hypertension47 (92)
 Cardiovascular disease28 (55)
 Diabetes mellitus21 (41)
 Malignanciesc 13 (25)
 Atrial fibrillation12 (24)
 COPDd 11 (22)
Number of medications, median (range)13 (7–21)

Data are given as number (%) except where stated otherwise

aPost-renal disease = hydronephrosis, kidney-stone disease or retroperitoneal fibrosis

bOther = kidney cancer, loss of kidney graft, amyloidosis, poisoning or anti-glomerular-basement-membrane nephritis

cMalignancies = prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, testicular cancer, lung cancer, kidney cancer, lymphoma or myelomatosis

dCOPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Table 2

Potentially inappropriate medications identified by the Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions

Cardiovascular system
 Calcium-channel blocker with chronic constipation7 (14)
 Aspirin (>150 mg/day)4 (8)
Gastrointestinal system
 Proton-pump inhibitor for peptic ulcer disease at full therapeutic dosage for >8 weeks11 (22)
 Loperamide2 (4)
Central nervous system
 Long-term administration of long-acting benzodiazepines6 (12)
 First-generation antihistamine (prolonged use for >1 week)6 (12)
 Tricyclic antidepressants with an opiate or calcium-channel blocker2 (4)
 Opiates2 (4)
Endocrine system
 Beta-blockers in those with diabetes mellitus and frequent hypoglycaemic episodes1 (2)
Total number of potentially inappropriate medications 41

Data are given as number (%)

Characteristics of the study population (n = 51) Data are given as number (%) except where stated otherwise aPost-renal disease = hydronephrosis, kidney-stone disease or retroperitoneal fibrosis bOther = kidney cancer, loss of kidney graft, amyloidosis, poisoning or anti-glomerular-basement-membrane nephritis cMalignancies = prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, testicular cancer, lung cancer, kidney cancer, lymphoma or myelomatosis dCOPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Potentially inappropriate medications identified by the Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions Data are given as number (%) The number of PIMs did not differ significantly with age (≤ 74 vs. >74 years, p = 0.39), sex (male vs. female, p = 0.74), co-morbidity severity (CCI ≤5 vs. >5, p = 1.00), time in haemodialysis (≤8 months vs. >8 months, p = 0.78) or number of medications (≤13 vs. >13, p = 0.56). Beers criteria defined PIMs in 22 patients (43 %). The most common PIM according to the Beers criteria was proton pump inhibitors (Table 3).
Table 3

Potentially inappropriate medications identified by the Beers criteria

Cardiovascular system
 Amiodarone2 (4)
Gastrointestinal system
 Proton-pump inhibitors (over >8 weeks avoid, unless for high-risk patients, risk of Clostridium difficile infection, bone loss and fractures)10 (20)
 Metoclopramide (can cause extrapyramidal effects)1 (2)
Central nervous system
 Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with a history of falls4 (8)
 Long-acting and short-acting benzodiazepines with a history of falls3 (6)
 Tricyclic antidepressants with a history of falls2 (4)
Total number of potentially inappropriate medications 22

Data are given as number (%)

Potentially inappropriate medications identified by the Beers criteria Data are given as number (%) The kappa coefficient between raters for the STOPP criteria was 0.42 (0.24–0.56, 95 % CI) and for the Beers criteria kappa was 1.0. The % agreement was 0.78 for STOPP and 1.00 for Beers, respectively. The disagreements occurred within two of the STOPP criteria on the interpretation of adverse effects: history of falls and chronic constipation.

Discussion

The prevalence of PIMs based on the STOPP criteria was high (63 %) in this study of elderly Norwegian haemodialysis patients. No previous studies have presented use of the STOPP criteria in a haemodialysis population. However, our finding are in line with two recent studies involving patients with chronic kidney disease that applied Beers criteria [9, 10]. In previous studies involving general geriatric populations the prevalence of PIMs ranged widely (21.4–79 %) when applying the STOPP criteria [18-22]. The variations between the reported prevalence of PIMs can probably be attributed to differences in study populations [6, 11, 13, 16, 20, 23–25]. The present study chose to apply the STOPP criteria because of their documented association with a reduction in PIMs in randomized studies [11, 12], and because the STOPP criteria reportedly identify more PIMs than the Beers criteria in European elderly patients [11, 13, 23]. In the present study, the prevalence of PIMs was higher with the STOPP criteria than with the Beers criteria, which is in line with previous reports [13, 26]. The inter-rater reliability of STOPP was lower than in previous reports [6, 15, 27]. However, these differences should be interpreted with caution because of differences in study designs and populations Previous studies involving elderly populations found that the number of PIMs was positively associated with the number of medications, age and number of co-morbidities [11, 23, 25]. In contrast, the present study found no associations between the number of PIMs and age, sex, co-morbidity severity, time on haemodialysis and number of medications. This difference between the studies may be due to differences in the case mix between the populations or the small number of participants in the present study. This study had several limitations. The patients were relatively old and the number of patients was small, and so the results cannot be generalized to all patients with ESRD. The small sample size also limited the analysis of risk factors for PIMs, and multivariable analysis was not considered meaningful. The study did not include a comparison group. Finally, the STOPP criteria were not developed specifically for use in patients with ESRD and they do not evaluate several drugs commonly used by patients with renal impairment, such as phosphate binders, erythropoietin, potassium binders and calcimimetics.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the prevalence of PIMs among elderly haemodialysis patients was high when applying the STOPP criteria and the Beers criteria, even though these criteria do not evaluate nephrology-specific drugs. In contrast, the STOPP criteria identified more PIMs compared with the Beers criteria in our study population. This finding supports the use of medication review to identify and avoid PIMs in haemodialysis patients, who are typically exposed to polypharmacy.
Potentially inappropriate medications according to STOPP criteria were identified in 63 % of elderly haemodialysis patients and in 43 % using the Beers criteria.
Proton pump inhibitors were the most prevalent drugs according to STOPP criteria.
The number of potentially inappropriate medications was not significantly associated with number of medications, age, sex and co-morbidity.
  24 in total

1.  American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Prevention of potentially inappropriate prescribing for elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial using STOPP/START criteria.

Authors:  P F Gallagher; M N O'Connor; D O'Mahony
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Potentially inappropriate medications defined by STOPP criteria and the risk of adverse drug events in older hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Hilary Hamilton; Paul Gallagher; Cristin Ryan; Stephen Byrne; Denis O'Mahony
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-06-13

4.  Inappropriate drug prescription at nursing home admission.

Authors:  Fermín García-Gollarte; José Baleriola-Júlvez; Isabel Ferrero-López; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 4.669

5.  A comparison of the application of STOPP/START to patients' drug lists with and without clinical information.

Authors:  Cristín Ryan; Denis O'Mahony; Dónal Óg O'Donovan; Emer O'Grady; Peter Weedle; Julia Kennedy; Stephen Byrne
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2012-12-09

6.  STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment). Consensus validation.

Authors:  P Gallagher; C Ryan; S Byrne; J Kennedy; D O'Mahony
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.366

Review 7.  Application of the STOPP/START criteria: a systematic review of the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults, and evidence of clinical, humanistic and economic impact.

Authors:  B Hill-Taylor; I Sketris; J Hayden; S Byrne; D O'Sullivan; R Christie
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Intervention with the screening tool of older persons potentially inappropriate prescriptions/screening tool to alert doctors to right treatment criteria in elderly residents of a chronic geriatric facility: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Dvora Frankenthal; Yaffa Lerman; Edward Kalendaryev; Yehuda Lerman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Application of STOPP and START criteria: interrater reliability among pharmacists.

Authors:  Cristin Ryan; Denis O'Mahony; Stephen Byrne
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Potentially inappropriate prescribing in patients on admission and discharge from an older peoples' unit of an acute UK hospital.

Authors:  Raliat Onatade; Vivian Auyeung; Greg Scutt; Jasmine Fernando
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.923

View more
  9 in total

1.  Kidney Function, Polypharmacy, and Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in a Community-Based Cohort of Older Adults.

Authors:  Alex Secora; G Caleb Alexander; Shoshana H Ballew; Josef Coresh; Morgan E Grams
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Effectiveness of using STOPP/START criteria to identify potentially inappropriate medication in people aged ≥ 65 years with chronic kidney disease: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Krystina Parker; Ingrid Bull-Engelstad; Jūratė Šaltytė Benth; Willy Aasebø; Nanna von der Lippe; Morten Reier-Nilsen; Ingrid Os; Knut Stavem
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  High-risk medications in older patients with trauma: a cross-sectional study of risk mitigation

Authors:  Erica Lester; Mark Dykstra; Chantalle Grant; Vanessa Fawcett; Bonnie Tsang; Sandy Widder
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Less is More: Deprescribing Medications in Older Adults with Kidney Disease: A Review.

Authors:  Dinushika Mohottige; Harold J Manley; Rasheeda K Hall
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-07-09

Review 5.  Dialysate Potassium, Dialysate Magnesium, and Hemodialysis Risk.

Authors:  Patrick H Pun; John P Middleton
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Breaking the cycle of functional decline in older dialysis patients.

Authors:  Rasheeda K Hall; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Differences in quality of life and cognition between the elderly and the very elderly hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Fernanda Siqueira Viana; Yolanda Eliza M Boechat; Jocemir Ronaldo Lugon; Jorge Paulo Strogoff de Matos
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2019-03-18

8.  Potentially inappropriate medications prescribing to elderly patients with advanced chronic kidney by using 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria.

Authors:  Bahia Chahine
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-07

Review 9.  End of Life Care in End-Stage Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Ravindra Attur Prabhu; Naveen Salins; Georgi Abraham
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2021-05-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.