Literature DB >> 27747489

Current Consensus and Controversies in Guidelines for Lipid and Hypertension Management in Diabetes.

Om P Ganda1, Joanna Mitri2.   

Abstract

Despite major advances, many patients with diabetes are currently achieving suboptimal control of lipids and blood pressure. The new cholesterol guidelines by the ACC/AHA have reignited the emphasis on more intensive treatment with statins in the population at high risk of CVD, including those with diabetes. While these guidelines do not include specific lipid goals, several other guidelines have retained previously defined risk-based LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals. More recent data indicate potential benefits in CVD outcomes with non-statin therapy added to statin therapy. On-going long-term trials with PCSK-9 inhibitors may help answer the question of the benefits and safety of very low LDL-C. Regarding the blood pressure guidelines, there remains an inconsistency of evidence for targets to reduce CVD outcomes. The ACCORD trial weighted heavily in the recent meta-analyses, leading to currently recommended goal of <140/90 mmHg. Studies targeting blood pressure goals of <130 mmHg in younger patients with diabetes, including sub-populations of interest, may help solve the controversy. Until we have these data, perhaps it is time to shift our focus from a rigid blood pressure target to risk-based goals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure guidelines; CVD clinical trials; Diabetes and CVD; Guideline controversies; Lipid guidelines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27747489     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-016-0790-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  50 in total

1.  CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM--2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.

Authors:  Alan J Garber; Martin J Abrahamson; Joshua I Barzilay; Lawrence Blonde; Zachary T Bloomgarden; Michael A Bush; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; Ralph A DeFronzo; Daniel Einhorn; Vivian A Fonseca; Jeffrey R Garber; W Timothy Garvey; George Grunberger; Yehuda Handelsman; Robert R Henry; Irl B Hirsch; Paul S Jellinger; Janet B McGill; Jeffrey I Mechanick; Paul D Rosenblit; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  The 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines on the treatment of blood cholesterol: questions, questions, questions.

Authors:  Henry N Ginsberg
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Prevention guidelines: bad process, bad outcome.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 4.  Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dena Ettehad; Connor A Emdin; Amit Kiran; Simon G Anderson; Thomas Callender; Jonathan Emberson; John Chalmers; Anthony Rodgers; Kazem Rahimi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Henry N Ginsberg; Marshall B Elam; Laura C Lovato; John R Crouse; Lawrence A Leiter; Peter Linz; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; Hertzel C Gerstein; Jeffrey Probstfield; Richard H Grimm; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; J Thomas Bigger; David C Goff; William C Cushman; Denise G Simons-Morton; Robert P Byington
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events.

Authors:  Philip J Barter; Mark Caulfield; Mats Eriksson; Scott M Grundy; John J P Kastelein; Michel Komajda; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Lori Mosca; Jean-Claude Tardif; David D Waters; Charles L Shear; James H Revkin; Kevin A Buhr; Marian R Fisher; Alan R Tall; Bryan Brewer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Type 1 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association.

Authors:  Sarah D de Ferranti; Ian H de Boer; Vivian Fonseca; Caroline S Fox; Sherita Hill Golden; Carl J Lavie; Sheela N Magge; Nikolaus Marx; Darren K McGuire; Trevor J Orchard; Bernard Zinman; Robert H Eckel
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  The polygenic nature of hypertriglyceridaemia: implications for definition, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Robert A Hegele; Henry N Ginsberg; M John Chapman; Børge G Nordestgaard; Jan Albert Kuivenhoven; Maurizio Averna; Jan Borén; Eric Bruckert; Alberico L Catapano; Olivier S Descamps; G Kees Hovingh; Steve E Humphries; Petri T Kovanen; Luis Masana; Päivi Pajukanta; Klaus G Parhofer; Frederick J Raal; Kausik K Ray; Raul D Santos; Anton F H Stalenhoef; Erik Stroes; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Anne Tybjærg-Hansen; Gerald F Watts; Olov Wiklund
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 32.069

10.  Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Martin J Landray; Richard Haynes; Jemma C Hopewell; Sarah Parish; Theingi Aung; Joseph Tomson; Karl Wallendszus; Martin Craig; Lixin Jiang; Rory Collins; Jane Armitage
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Dyslipidemia in diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Haider J Warraich; Jamal S Rana
Journal:  Cardiovasc Endocrinol       Date:  2017-02-15

Review 2.  Beyond Statins: Who and When to Prescribe?

Authors:  Om Ganda
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.810

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.