Literature DB >> 27746725

Monopolizing Sanctioning Power under Noise Eliminates Perverse Punishment But Does Not Increase Cooperation.

Sven Fischer1, Kristoffel Grechenig2, Nicolas Meier3.   

Abstract

We run several experiments which allow us to compare cooperation under perfect and imperfect information in a centralized and decentralized punishment regime. Under perfect and extremely noisy information, aggregate behavior does not differ between institutions. Under intermediate noise, punishment escalates in the decentralized peer-to-peer punishment regime which badly affects efficiency while sustaining cooperation for longer. Only decentralized punishment is often directed at cooperators (perverse punishment). We report several, sometimes subtle, differences in punishment behavior, and how contributions react.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-social punishment; centralized punishment; cooperation; imperfect information; perverse punishment; public good

Year:  2016        PMID： 27746725      PMCID： PMC5040719          DOI： 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci        ISSN： 1662-5153            Impact factor:   3.558


  7 in total

1.  Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate.

Authors:  Francesco Guala
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  The long-run benefits of punishment.

Authors:  Simon Gächter; Elke Renner; Martin Sefton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Altruistic punishment in humans.

Authors:  Ernst Fehr; Simon Gächter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans.

Authors:  Delia Baldassarri; Guy Grossman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Constraining free riding in public goods games: designated solitary punishers can sustain human cooperation.

Authors:  Rick O'Gorman; Joseph Henrich; Mark Van Vugt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Antisocial punishment across societies.

Authors:  Benedikt Herrmann; Christian Thöni; Simon Gächter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  An economic experiment reveals that humans prefer pool punishment to maintain the commons.

Authors:  Arne Traulsen; Torsten Röhl; Manfred Milinski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 5.349
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Consensual punishment does not promote cooperation in the six-person prisoner's dilemma game with noisy public monitoring.

Authors:  Nynke van Miltenburg; Wojtek Przepiorka; Vincent Buskens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.